In addition, I’ve already made it clear that I am not a fan of John Kerry. Regardless of what you think, none of us are voting for the man, but for the party. And that means you.
Then that means that you have no more need to force me to read your “historical forces,” now, doesn’t it?
Actually, you could say I AM voting for the man. If your party, DG, had a credible candidate, I would consider him/her. While I am conservative, I reserve the right to NOT vote along party lines.
I see Da union Goon can’t face facts again. Hey Goon, what about forging documents to prove false statements? My how desperate Democraps are, and TEXAS DEMOCRAPS are abject liars.
not knowing something is false and then repeating it does not make you a liar.
How can any of you comment on Moore’s movie if you haven’t even seen it?
well i saw it, nt legally but i was not going to put money in his pocket and he did tell peopel to see it by any means..even illegal means.
Fact #1: Bush failed to protect the US on 9/11 despite ample warnings of such an attack.
what warnings? you mean the the report with historic data that might sound scary “bin laden plans attack in america!” but if you bother to check it out..it does not help?
Fact #2: Bush invaded Iraq on dubious terms, despite the warnings of them damn French to be patient.
bush invaded iraq on intel from russia, CIA, MI6 and 8 years of democrats maoning saddam should be taken out and had WMDs and ties to terrorists.
Fact #3: Bush tried to stop the 9/11 Commission and it’s investigation to the dismay for victims family.
i was against the panel as well, the chance of an attack on bush was very high, the left would love nothing better, and given the early questions by the panel..they tried their best, look at Rice and how they tried to twist her words, too bad for them she would not back down and kept on with the truth.
Seriously, I would have tried to stop the “independent” 9/11 commission as well. thanks, dg – you just made me realize why bush would do that.
And fuck u, dg – i am voting for the man. don’t tell me what i am voting for. big corporations stimulate the economy, you dumbass. i worked for 2 of the big 4 (yes, there are only 4 now, thanks to the enron/aa shit) consulting firms so i am insulted by your accusations.
saddam husseim was a WMD in and of himself! you don’t think the serin gas they found was a weapon? go hide your head in the sand a little more.
The family of the victims of 9/11 disagree with you, and Bush. BTW, Bush supports the 9/11 commission NOW, and acts like he supported it all along. Another Lie.
“The 9/11 Commission’s Final Report plainly lays out the facts and circumstances that surround 9/11 and clearly illustrates that 9/11 was both an institutional and individual failure.
The “Enrons” support Bush, dumbass. Big Corporations pay little if any tax, while you pay out the ass.
In 2000, the average CEO compensations was 282 times a workers salary. In 2003 it went up to 301 times a workers pay. If the minimum wage had risen at the same rate since 1990, it would be $15.76 today.
The less taxes corporations pay and the less they pay their workers, the more they raise prices and gouge consumers.
Keep suckin on ‘em, Wally. They love suckers like you.
Bush was warned to be patient, but he thinks he’s a cowboy. Reckless cowboys are dangerous.
Saddam was a WMD himself? It is far more dangerous in Iraq now. Go here for a little history lesson:
“The Family Steering Committee (FSC) is an independent, nonpartisan group of individuals who lost loved ones on September 11, 2001. The FSC is not affiliated with any other group, nor does it receive financial or other support from any organization or individual.”
The family of the victims of 9/11 disagree with you, and Bush.
so? really i feel sorry for all the family’s of 9/11 but they don’t become experts in every field, you should hear them out of course but you can’t go and say “they sai this so it’s 100% correct thign to do!”, and plenty of family’s support bush and agree with him.
Keep suckin on ‘em, Wally. They love suckers like you.
and i love being a sucker, everyone loves a tootsie roll pop…
Bush was warned to be patient, but he thinks he’s a cowboy. Reckless cowboys are dangerous.
you know what is a greater danger? playboys who sit around doing nothing but finding new places to put cigars while letting terrorists run free.
Saddam was a WMD himself? It is far more dangerous in Iraq now. Go here for a little history lesson:
one of these days the sane people should take and study the lefty wing nuts, we really need to figure out what makes them tick, maybe coem up with a medicine ot control it…
“the only dead Americans were on Monicas blue dress.”
Ha. That’s a good one. I’ll have to remember it in conversation. (We’ll just ignore the 3? dead at the WTC in ’93?, the Embasys in Africa (only Africans Died (39?), the USS Cole, the Federal building in OK. City, Waco TX, etc.)
3 + 39 + How many on the Cole + the Federal building + at Waco = Less than the 3000+ killed on 9/11, the 1000+ killed in Iraq and what’s the number in Afgahnistan?
At this rate, Bush’s second term will have killed more people than have been killed during his first term. (Presidential terms x 2 = 8000+?)
Then that means that you have no more need to force me to read your “historical forces,” now, doesn’t it?
“Historical forces” = “Historical sources”
Guess that’s an official “Freudian slip!”
Actually, you could say I AM voting for the man. If your party, DG, had a credible candidate, I would consider him/her. While I am conservative, I reserve the right to NOT vote along party lines.
I see Da union Goon can’t face facts again. Hey Goon, what about forging documents to prove false statements? My how desperate Democraps are, and TEXAS DEMOCRAPS are abject liars.
Liars?
Why are Americans dying in Iraq even though there is NO WMD’s, contradicting what Bush said?
Bush is a liar!
How can any of you comment on Moore’s movie if you haven’t even seen it?
How narrow minded is that?
As far as party lines, how many Dems is Bush stumping for?
Ronald Dickhead Reagan claimed the 11th Commandment is “Thou shalt not speak ill of another Republican.”
Fact #1: Bush failed to protect the US on 9/11 despite ample warnings of such an attack.
Fact #2: Bush invaded Iraq on dubious terms, despite the warnings of them damn French to be patient.
Fact #3: Bush tried to stop the 9/11 Commission and it’s investigation to the dismay fo victims family.
You’re not voting for the man. You are voting for big corporations, wearing a blue suit occupying the oval office.
But believe what you want.
BTW, AG
You have again typed a multi-paragrahed post explaining your refusal to answer. It was a simple point. None of you can respond:
Why did Bush try to stop the 9/11 investigation?
I know why you won’t answer…
…yer skeert!
Bush is a liar!
not knowing something is false and then repeating it does not make you a liar.
How can any of you comment on Moore’s movie if you haven’t even seen it?
well i saw it, nt legally but i was not going to put money in his pocket and he did tell peopel to see it by any means..even illegal means.
Fact #1: Bush failed to protect the US on 9/11 despite ample warnings of such an attack.
what warnings? you mean the the report with historic data that might sound scary “bin laden plans attack in america!” but if you bother to check it out..it does not help?
Fact #2: Bush invaded Iraq on dubious terms, despite the warnings of them damn French to be patient.
bush invaded iraq on intel from russia, CIA, MI6 and 8 years of democrats maoning saddam should be taken out and had WMDs and ties to terrorists.
Fact #3: Bush tried to stop the 9/11 Commission and it’s investigation to the dismay for victims family.
i was against the panel as well, the chance of an attack on bush was very high, the left would love nothing better, and given the early questions by the panel..they tried their best, look at Rice and how they tried to twist her words, too bad for them she would not back down and kept on with the truth.
Seriously, I would have tried to stop the “independent” 9/11 commission as well. thanks, dg – you just made me realize why bush would do that.
And fuck u, dg – i am voting for the man. don’t tell me what i am voting for. big corporations stimulate the economy, you dumbass. i worked for 2 of the big 4 (yes, there are only 4 now, thanks to the enron/aa shit) consulting firms so i am insulted by your accusations.
saddam husseim was a WMD in and of himself! you don’t think the serin gas they found was a weapon? go hide your head in the sand a little more.
i’m crabby today, if no one can tell. this packers game at 10 should help me out.
Hey wally,
The family of the victims of 9/11 disagree with you, and Bush. BTW, Bush supports the 9/11 commission NOW, and acts like he supported it all along. Another Lie.
“The 9/11 Commission’s Final Report plainly lays out the facts and circumstances that surround 9/11 and clearly illustrates that 9/11 was both an institutional and individual failure.
The “Enrons” support Bush, dumbass. Big Corporations pay little if any tax, while you pay out the ass.
In 2000, the average CEO compensations was 282 times a workers salary. In 2003 it went up to 301 times a workers pay. If the minimum wage had risen at the same rate since 1990, it would be $15.76 today.
The less taxes corporations pay and the less they pay their workers, the more they raise prices and gouge consumers.
Keep suckin on ‘em, Wally. They love suckers like you.
Bush was warned to be patient, but he thinks he’s a cowboy. Reckless cowboys are dangerous.
Saddam was a WMD himself? It is far more dangerous in Iraq now. Go here for a little history lesson:
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/index.htm
Dg,
So now YOU speak for ALL the victom-families of 9-11?
Say what you want, but PLEASE don’t pretend that you know what ALL the familiies think…
I’m just repeating what they are saying:
“The Family Steering Committee (FSC) is an independent, nonpartisan group of individuals who lost loved ones on September 11, 2001. The FSC is not affiliated with any other group, nor does it receive financial or other support from any organization or individual.”
http://www.911independentcommission.org/
My guess is, you won’t find any family member who did NOT want an investigation as to why our defenses failed on 9/11.
Can you name one? Let me know.
Hey wally,
The family of the victims of 9/11 disagree with you, and Bush.
so? really i feel sorry for all the family’s of 9/11 but they don’t become experts in every field, you should hear them out of course but you can’t go and say “they sai this so it’s 100% correct thign to do!”, and plenty of family’s support bush and agree with him.
Keep suckin on ‘em, Wally. They love suckers like you.
and i love being a sucker, everyone loves a tootsie roll pop…
Bush was warned to be patient, but he thinks he’s a cowboy. Reckless cowboys are dangerous.
you know what is a greater danger? playboys who sit around doing nothing but finding new places to put cigars while letting terrorists run free.
Saddam was a WMD himself? It is far more dangerous in Iraq now. Go here for a little history lesson:
one of these days the sane people should take and study the lefty wing nuts, we really need to figure out what makes them tick, maybe coem up with a medicine ot control it…
What benefit are there by not investigating why our defenses failed on 9/11?
At least when Clinton lied, the only dead Americans were on Monicas blue dress.
Are you saying it’s safer now then when Bush said “Mission Accomplished”?
Did you check out the site? Get a little history:
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/index.htm
“the only dead Americans were on Monicas blue dress.”
Ha. That’s a good one.
I’ll have to remember it in conversation. (We’ll just ignore the 3? dead at the WTC in ’93?, the Embasys in Africa (only Africans Died (39?), the USS Cole, the Federal building in OK. City, Waco TX, etc.)
3 + 39 + How many on the Cole + the Federal building + at Waco = Less than the 3000+ killed on 9/11, the 1000+ killed in Iraq and what’s the number in Afgahnistan?
At this rate, Bush’s second term will have killed more people than have been killed during his first term. (Presidential terms x 2 = 8000+?)
Keep juggling those numbers…