So much for terrorists not caring if you’re a Democrat or a Republican.
Make note. They care.
Terrorists are pro-Kerry - including king terrorist himself, Osama Bin Laden.
Osama bin Laden warned in his October Surprise video that he will be closely monitoring the state-by-state election returns in tomorrow’s presidential race ” and will spare any state that votes against President Bush from being attacked, according to a new analysis of his statement.
As a side note, read about the portions of the Osama videotape that the media probably won’t report until Nov. 3rd. Apparently what you didn’t hear in regards to the Osama Bin Laden video tape released last week is the cave-dwelling terror lord talking about the setbacks al Qaeda has faced in recent months and complaining that the manhunt against him has hampered al Qaeda.
I’ve never said Bush was in a “big oil conspiracy”.
so, let me get this straight.. you supported billy blowjob attacking a murderous dictator (Milosovic) for murdering thousands of innocent people in his own country, and you criticize President Bush for attacking a murderous dictator (Hussein) for murdering thousands of innocent people in his own country. just seeing if I follow your logic.
Mike Kilo- Don’t forget about all of our troops that died on “peace keeping” missions to liberate countries like Indonesia, Bosnia, and Somalia during the 90′s.
Nobody holds Clinton accountable for that mess in Mogadishu. He gets a pass while Bush is hamstrung over a fire for removing a Brutal murderous hitler in the making from power.
Go figure….
K,
I’ve typed it in this stream. Saddam was a threat to his own people. If that’s what the war is about, then by all means, Bush should have made that case. He didn’t.
Clinton is very widely criticised for his handling of Somalia, Bosnia, Haiti, Rwanda, and the Sudan – and by me as well. You guys are no longer arguing.
Kilo – you are right. The difference is that had Clinton invaded and occupied the former Yugoslavia, I would be every bit as against him as I am against Bush on Iraq. The way that Bush did it was not the only way, my friends.
Yeah, here we have millions of illeagles streaming into the country on Clinton’s watch and he does dick about it, but he goes after that Elian Gonzalez kid witha vengence…..
That was almaost as lame as when Carter accepted all of those Cuban refugees into America and Castro emptied his prisons and sent them over here.
Another great moment under a liberal president.
Sandyb….it’s never perfect, and if you really think JOhn F. Simoes Ferierra Heinz Kennedy Kerry could have done better, you really are nuts..first of all, Saddaam would still be in power.
After The President is re-elected tommorow, isn’t it finally time for the left to put down the hate, roll up their sleeves and ask what they can do to help? Isn’t it? God damn….whining isn’t the answer.
K- But Bush did make that case before we went to war with Iraq. And we all knew what a piece of sh-t Saddam was anyways. Bush didn’t have to tell us.
Check out his first state of the union address.
illeagles? are those sick birds? just poking a little fun, snatch.
I think the left needs to either sit down and shut the f-ck up or step up and help out. They are just impeding our goals withtheir continuous adversity.
If Osama Bin Laden has put his two cents n to this election, doesn’t that tell you liberals anything?
Our enemies know that this Country is so divided and are using that to their advantages.
When Bush wins tomorrow, it’s time to squash the beef and for America to get to work.
Bush never said that Saddam human-rights abuses were a main reason for war. I invite you to read the transcript of the October 7, 2002 speech in Cincinnati on the White House website. He talks about unmanned aircraft attacking the US, a chemical and biological weapons stockpile, and “five ways” (very mysterious) that Saddam was reconstituting his WMD capability.
146 – you aren’t a clinton supporter, are you a kerry supporter? and i don’t think kuwait would agree that iraq wasn’t a threat to its neighbors.
K, by the way, sorry for calling you girls “Guys”.
So on that note, are you hot?:cool:
I think if Bush wins, it is time for the left to work with him to forge a sound foreign policy. But Bush has to do his part, as well, and use more future caution and learn from his mistakes. If Kerry wins, will your rhetoric of unity stand? Lisa has said so, and I commend her for it.
How about you, Sandyb? You look good for a liberal or what?
See, I could tolerate you being a liberal if you had a nice bod.
Oh, sorry, I’m being sexist.:twisted:
161 LOL Snatch…aren’t you married?
K,
Saddam was a threat to his neighbours in 1990. Fourteen years ago. And I am not a Kerry supporter, either.
162 – I would, but I will have a REALLY hard time listening to him in my living room for the next 4 years.
On that note, who do you think Hillary’s voting for?
Well, I’m no Ann Coulter, but…
165 – True, but he still was a barbarian.
So, are you going to vote?
Gotta excuse myself from this dinner discussion. Drop back in soon.
Later all.:cool:
K,
You mean Hillary Clinton? Probably Kerry. I haven’t asked her.
On foreign policy, Bush supported PLO terrorist Yasser Arafat in power and repeatedly urged Sharon to halt Israel’s counter-terrorist operations until Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon finally succeeded in persuading him to change course and find enough moral clarity to support the Israeli war against the Palestinian terrorists.
link
Sandy…If, by some miracle, or clever legal wrangling and Union thuggery, Kerry wins.. Yes, my message of unity will stand. It will be difficult for me, however, as a veteran to pay allegiance to this lying self-serving piece of crap for all that he has done to harm my fellow veterans.
In pursuing relations with Communist China, the president has opted to pursue a Clintonian policy of accommodation, if not outright appeasement. Last year, Bush signed an executive order to permit the sale of significantly more advanced supercomputers than those allowed to be sold by the Clinton Administration. He has also championed the awarding of permanent most favored nation trade status and WTO membership for Communist China, whose record on killing hundreds of thousands of its political and religious dissidents, forcing tens of millions of Chinese women to have abortions every year, threatening nuclear incineration of American cities and continued unrestricted sales of advanced nuclear warhead and ballistic missile technology to America’s enemies leaves much to be desired. The Bush policy of appeasing the Butchers of Beijing has had the effect of rewarding them for their ‘bad behavior’ while encouraging future offenses and escalated threats against our Free Chinese allies on Taiwan.
same link as 171
170 – i think she may want to see that spot open in ’08.
K,
I have to go back to my life after this post, so goodbye to all except for Kilo. I did vote, but for a third party candidate. I thought it over for a full year, but I’m registered in a safe state for Bush, so I thought I’d vote for the candidate who probably is the most congruent with my politics – Nader. You can all rejoice. Anyway, later.
You know, Kilo, the polls are quite close – Kerry could take it without the shenanigans you cite. You certainly have the right to rail against him if he does.
Take care, Sandyb.
Shiloh..is this more of your “I know you are, but what am I”.. 3rd grade rhetoric??????
Now all of a sudden you are calling Bush a communist appeaser?? Are you kidding???
Sandy..Kerry could never win without the democrats registering dead people and cats, trading crack for votes, posting union goons at polling places, etc. etc. etc. ..It wouldn’t even be close.
an issue: Lisa said the ‘media’ wouldn’t report what she says in the intro re: red states are in danger from obl.
33 or more major newspapers have endorsed Bush. what reason would they have to hide this ’til after the election?
LANSING, Mich. – Some Michigan voters have received phone calls falsely claiming that Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry would make gay marriage legal, Kerry’s Michigan campaign said Monday.
link
you think the Democrats are making these calls?
John Kerry, Michael Moore, the New York Times and CNN are getting Americans killed in Iraq and risking a terrorist catastrophe here at home, because of their pathological hatred of George Bush.
(boy how the rhetoric soars, even in shame, the day before.)
link
180- because it helps Bush. the MAJOR mainstream media do not want Bush to stay in office.
181 – this is happening on both sides. One lady on the radio this am played a taped message that was on her answering machine that made Bush sound like an idiot. She called the phone company and that call was tracked back to the Arizona Republic newspaper offices! Nice.
181 – even your article talks about both sides. dirty, dirty, dirty.
183 – why would newspapers wanting Bush to win sit on a story that might help him?
the ones that are announcing it are. but your cbs, nbc, etc. seem to be sitting on it.
who is announcing it? the new york post and who?
K i just went to several conservative newspapers, even Scaife’s pittsburh news-review, washinton times, rocky mountain news etc – couldn’t find it.
188 – why am i responsible for this? i’m not in the media. why are your undies in a bundle about it?
Next thing you know, Shiloh is going to deny a liberal bias at NY Times, LA times, Chicago Tribune, Philadelphia Inquier, CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS, MSNBC, etc. etc. etc. ….denial is NOT just a river in Egypt, is it Shiloh?
easy, love. you asked for an issue. you’re not responsibile.
i think it’s a fair question. perhaps someone will refine my searches and show me differently.
i haven’t seen it so far.
It’s ok though K…take heart.. Shiloh, Michael Moore, Fidel Castro, Kim Jong-IL, PLO, Gunga Dan Blather, etc. will NOT be able to hijack our country….. BUSH 54% to Kerry 46% with OVER 300 Electoral votes.
Praise be to Allah.
192 – mike – curious – can you think of any newspaper or network that may have a conservative tilt to it?
193 referred to 190, not 192.
Mike
define liberal tilt?
do I really have to? …sure there are a handful of conservative papers in the country..a small fraction of the leftist rags.
Look, 92% of Washington based journalists admitted in a Pew research survey to voting for Billy Blowjob in 1996, when ONLY 43% of 43% of registered voters did…..would you NOT CALL THAT BIAS???? Are you on crack???
shiloh, the one thing that worries me about you is that it your job to dispatch airplanes, yet you comment here at a rate of about 4 posts/minute.