NY TIMES INVESTIGATES ADOPTION RECORDS OF SUPREME COURT NOMINEE’S CHILDREN
Hattip to PCD
The NEW YORK TIMES is looking into the adoption records of the children of Supreme Court Nominee John G. Roberts, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.
The TIMES has investigative reporter Glen Justice hot on the case to investigate the status of adoption records of Judge Roberts’ two young children, Josie age 5 and Jack age 4, a top source reveals.
Judge Roberts and his wife Jane adopted the children when they each were infants.
Both children were adopted from Latin America.
A TIMES insider claims the look into the adoption papers are part of the paper’s “standard background check.”
Roberts’ young son Jack delighted millions of Americans during his father’s Supreme Court nomination announcement ceremony when he wouldn’t stop dancing while the President and his father spoke to a national television audience.
Previously the WASHINGTON POST Style section had published a story criticizing the outfits Mrs. Roberts had them wear at the announcement ceremony.
One top Washington official with knowledge of the NEW YORK TIMES action declared: “Trying to pry into the lives of the Roberts’ family like this is despicable. Children’s lives should be off limits. The TIMES is putting politics over fundamental decency.”
One top Republican official when told of the situation was incredulous. “This can’t possibly be true?”
The infamous NYT is the most far left rag in this nation just how low will they go to sell this offensive rag?:mad:
Let me get this straight… the “newspaper of record” that employs Maureen Down and Paul Krugman, and spent years covering jayson Blair’s ass…..is snooping into Roberts’s adopted children
THis is a new low, folks.
1- I agree snowy! This just infuriated me! Why is it their responsibility to look into the adoption records? These are tiny children that will hear things from other kids. You want to go after Roberts, have at it, but leave the kids alone!:mad:
2- I hadn’t even thought of it from that perspective. Now I am rally riled:mad:
I have an adopted child. I am so angry I could kill. There is NO legitimate reason to go this far to anal exam Judge Roberts. The NYTimes did not investigate John Kerry’s name change and family tree when he was running for President, so what makes Judge Roberts’ childrens’ adoption fair game other than sore loser Democrats looking for ANYTHING to smear Roberts with?
I pray I never see a NYTimes reporter. I may visit real physical violence upon him or her.
Yeah right… where was the NY Times expose’ on John Kohn, phoney Irish Catholic….I don’t remember reading that one.
Anyway you look at it, this is wrong. The sad thing is, they will probably be able to dig up things the Roberts can’t!
Incredible. If this were true proven to be true, I would sue the NYT.
Ted
Ted, who are you to try and inhibit a “free press”????
You facist.
the nyt rag isnt fit to wrap dead fish in. the lefties just keep getting lower and lower.
5-”I pray I never see a NYTimes reporter. I may visit real physical violence upon him or her.”
And you wonder why liberals want to limit guns.
11,
Yes, I wonder why. Care to explain?
Ted
11, Don’t need a gun a tire iron works wonders. Ask any union picket line enforcer, tofu.
Did you ever hear of the Biblical prohibition against provoking another to wrath? You Liberals do it all the time and alway come back with the LAME, “Don’t hurt me!”
9, Mike make note, the “muslim animals” are not to be called towel heads any more. The turbans they use are actually small folded sheets, therefore, the use of the term, “Little Sheet Heads”, is to replace “towel heads” in your RNC rant mantra.
For verification of this message use code Rush on your RNC decoder ring.
“Sheet Heads”? Sounds like something you’d hear in a Cheech and Chong movie.
17, so, I watch Cheech and Chong movies. What’s the problem? I also watch the series of “Tremors” and “Trancer” movies.
No, Hard Hat!
Come in Lardass!!
No, Hard Hat!
Lardass, Lardass!!
18, ROTFLOL!