<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are new refineries the answer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/07/are-new-refineries-the-answer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/07/are-new-refineries-the-answer/</link>
	<description>in all matter of opinion, our adversaries are insane.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 14:43:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: peejz</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/07/are-new-refineries-the-answer/comment-page-1/#comment-193547</link>
		<dc:creator>peejz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 02:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3419#comment-193547</guid>
		<description>8- Okay, I think we are on the same page now.  Your examples are why I put quotation marks around the word &quot;sound&quot; in my original comment under the post.:smile:

Not only was it a pin in the rear to change your windows, you now have more window to clean:wink:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>8- Okay, I think we are on the same page now.  Your examples are why I put quotation marks around the word &#8220;sound&#8221; in my original comment under the post.:smile:</p>
<p>Not only was it a pin in the rear to change your windows, you now have more window to clean:wink:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrmrArtyOffcr</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/07/are-new-refineries-the-answer/comment-page-1/#comment-193516</link>
		<dc:creator>FrmrArtyOffcr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2005 19:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3419#comment-193516</guid>
		<description>Peejz, we don&#039;t really disagree on this as much as you think. We both agree that the Oil Companies want to build new refineries. We both agree that they have the money to do so (BTW they aren&#039;t saying that they can&#039;t afford to build them only that the restrictions on upgrading older equipment is cost prohibitive.) It isn&#039;t really more cost effective to just build a new refinery instead of upgrading an older one. The permit process and the ecologic permits have already been secured for the older one. New ones are ridiculuosly tied up in the permit process and the endless frivolous lawsuits by the econazis. The oil companies aren&#039;t even asking to not meet industry standards on any new construction, just to not have to retrofit the whole damn refinery. I&#039;ll give you an example of this kind of regulation in reference to residential building codes here in Phoenix. Last year I had all of the windows in my house replaced under the airport&#039;s noise impact reduction program. Under the program any home receiving the new windows would have to have the doors, windows, and smoke detectors brought up to code. If I hadn&#039;t stopped them, I&#039;d have had 3 smoke detectors in my living room, and 2 in each bedroom. They also had to increase the size of the bedroom windows from 2 ft by 2 ft to 4 ft by 4 ft. This was a lot of fun considering my house is concrete block. They also had to install steel lintels and fill the columns on each side of the enlarged windows with concrete to meet code. Enlarging those two windows increased the cost of the job by at least 30% and probably over 40%. 

Clean Fuels AZ has spent millions of dollars over the past 5 years just on getting the permits to build a new refinery and despite their complying with all of the rules and regulations, the econazis are threatening them with a myriad of lawsuits to keep them  from actually building anything. Why are gas prices so high? Ask the econazis. The ridiculous rules and regulations that they have insisted on having has caused a number of smaller independent refineries to go out of business. Competition drives prices down. The Econazis don&#039;t care what impact they may have on any person, as long as they save a toad. That is as long as they don&#039;t have a wind park put in the view of their house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peejz, we don&#8217;t really disagree on this as much as you think. We both agree that the Oil Companies want to build new refineries. We both agree that they have the money to do so (BTW they aren&#8217;t saying that they can&#8217;t afford to build them only that the restrictions on upgrading older equipment is cost prohibitive.) It isn&#8217;t really more cost effective to just build a new refinery instead of upgrading an older one. The permit process and the ecologic permits have already been secured for the older one. New ones are ridiculuosly tied up in the permit process and the endless frivolous lawsuits by the econazis. The oil companies aren&#8217;t even asking to not meet industry standards on any new construction, just to not have to retrofit the whole damn refinery. I&#8217;ll give you an example of this kind of regulation in reference to residential building codes here in Phoenix. Last year I had all of the windows in my house replaced under the airport&#8217;s noise impact reduction program. Under the program any home receiving the new windows would have to have the doors, windows, and smoke detectors brought up to code. If I hadn&#8217;t stopped them, I&#8217;d have had 3 smoke detectors in my living room, and 2 in each bedroom. They also had to increase the size of the bedroom windows from 2 ft by 2 ft to 4 ft by 4 ft. This was a lot of fun considering my house is concrete block. They also had to install steel lintels and fill the columns on each side of the enlarged windows with concrete to meet code. Enlarging those two windows increased the cost of the job by at least 30% and probably over 40%. </p>
<p>Clean Fuels AZ has spent millions of dollars over the past 5 years just on getting the permits to build a new refinery and despite their complying with all of the rules and regulations, the econazis are threatening them with a myriad of lawsuits to keep them  from actually building anything. Why are gas prices so high? Ask the econazis. The ridiculous rules and regulations that they have insisted on having has caused a number of smaller independent refineries to go out of business. Competition drives prices down. The Econazis don&#8217;t care what impact they may have on any person, as long as they save a toad. That is as long as they don&#8217;t have a wind park put in the view of their house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peejz</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/07/are-new-refineries-the-answer/comment-page-1/#comment-193465</link>
		<dc:creator>Peejz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2005 01:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3419#comment-193465</guid>
		<description>6-&lt;em&gt;&quot;The problem is that you simply don&#039;t walk over to a piece of land, wave a magic wand and poof there&#039;s a refinery. It takes years and billions of dollars to build one.&quot;&lt;/em&gt; FOA the oil companies are reporting proifits in excess of &lt;strong&gt;$10 Billion per quarter&lt;/strong&gt;.  Money is not the problem, nor is adding capacity to outdated equipment the solution. I disagree with you very strongly on this.  The oil companies have the means to do this, but they are basically holding the consumer hostage.  They want to be able to build more efficient refineries, but do not want to comply with the new industry standards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>6-<em>&#8220;The problem is that you simply don&#8217;t walk over to a piece of land, wave a magic wand and poof there&#8217;s a refinery. It takes years and billions of dollars to build one.&#8221;</em> FOA the oil companies are reporting proifits in excess of <strong>$10 Billion per quarter</strong>.  Money is not the problem, nor is adding capacity to outdated equipment the solution. I disagree with you very strongly on this.  The oil companies have the means to do this, but they are basically holding the consumer hostage.  They want to be able to build more efficient refineries, but do not want to comply with the new industry standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrmrArtyOffcr</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/07/are-new-refineries-the-answer/comment-page-1/#comment-193457</link>
		<dc:creator>FrmrArtyOffcr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 23:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3419#comment-193457</guid>
		<description>The problem is that you simply don&#039;t walk over to a piece of land, wave a magic wand and poof there&#039;s a refinery. It takes years and billions of dollars to build one. Adding capacity to the old ones is generally much more efficient that building a new one, but with the new environmental regs, if you do any kind of upgrade to one part of a refinery, you have to upgrade the whole thing. It&#039;s like adding a closet to a 100 yr old house and being told that because you&#039;ve added a closet, you now have to bring everything in the house up to code including the plumbing, wiring, windows, insulation and remove all lead based paint. I had some replacement windows put in my house last year under an airport sound abatement program. In order for the permits and repairs to pass inspection, all of the windows in my 68 year old house had to be brought up to modern building codes. To do that, the contractors had to enlarge the windows in the 2 bedrooms from 2 ft by 2 ft to 4ft by 4ft. Not a fun job considering my house is concrete block. I&#039;m glad I didn&#039;t have to pay for the work. That little regulation alone caused the cost of those two windows to more than quadruple.

The permit process to build a new refinery is ridiculously complicated, Clean Fuel AZ has been working on getting a permit for over 5 years and millions of dollars. They haven&#039;t even broken ground yet. The environazi groups are still threatening lawsuits and the Envirocrats in the EPA are throwing up roadblock after roadblock even after all of the originally required tests and permits have been done. Peejz, the oil companies are more than willing to build them without subsidies, however they have to be allowed to do so. That is what is NOT happening at the moment. BTW with the length of time involved in getting the various permits approved, The standards can actually change during the permit cycle.

Why do you think they haven&#039;t built a refinery in almost 30 years and have closed a lot of the smaller ones because the cost of operating them and trying to bring them up to new environmental codes were simply too high. Recently an economist stated that the return on investment in oil stocks was actually lower than the S&amp;P 500 average by almost 50%. If the oil companies and investors are getting so rich, why are the oil companies underperforming in comparison to the remainder of the private business sector? Would not investors put their money where it would bring them the most return? Where would you put your money, an investment returning 5% or one returning 10%?

As for repairing the ones damaged by the two hurricanes, should we invest the money in companies that will create jobs for taxpayers, or should we simply hand the money out to the taxpayers while leaving them unemployed? Money invested in industrial projects circulates through the economy multiple times, money spent on social programs generates little economic return.

The problem is that many perfectly intelligent people like Peejz are being so inundated with socialist BS that it can become dificult to determine some of the more subtle facts like without profit, there is no investment. I understand that yes the oil companies make billions each year, but when it&#039;s only a 5% return on their investment, they&#039;re not good investments. If they didn&#039;t make billions, they have no investors and would go out of business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is that you simply don&#8217;t walk over to a piece of land, wave a magic wand and poof there&#8217;s a refinery. It takes years and billions of dollars to build one. Adding capacity to the old ones is generally much more efficient that building a new one, but with the new environmental regs, if you do any kind of upgrade to one part of a refinery, you have to upgrade the whole thing. It&#8217;s like adding a closet to a 100 yr old house and being told that because you&#8217;ve added a closet, you now have to bring everything in the house up to code including the plumbing, wiring, windows, insulation and remove all lead based paint. I had some replacement windows put in my house last year under an airport sound abatement program. In order for the permits and repairs to pass inspection, all of the windows in my 68 year old house had to be brought up to modern building codes. To do that, the contractors had to enlarge the windows in the 2 bedrooms from 2 ft by 2 ft to 4ft by 4ft. Not a fun job considering my house is concrete block. I&#8217;m glad I didn&#8217;t have to pay for the work. That little regulation alone caused the cost of those two windows to more than quadruple.</p>
<p>The permit process to build a new refinery is ridiculously complicated, Clean Fuel AZ has been working on getting a permit for over 5 years and millions of dollars. They haven&#8217;t even broken ground yet. The environazi groups are still threatening lawsuits and the Envirocrats in the EPA are throwing up roadblock after roadblock even after all of the originally required tests and permits have been done. Peejz, the oil companies are more than willing to build them without subsidies, however they have to be allowed to do so. That is what is NOT happening at the moment. BTW with the length of time involved in getting the various permits approved, The standards can actually change during the permit cycle.</p>
<p>Why do you think they haven&#8217;t built a refinery in almost 30 years and have closed a lot of the smaller ones because the cost of operating them and trying to bring them up to new environmental codes were simply too high. Recently an economist stated that the return on investment in oil stocks was actually lower than the S&amp;P 500 average by almost 50%. If the oil companies and investors are getting so rich, why are the oil companies underperforming in comparison to the remainder of the private business sector? Would not investors put their money where it would bring them the most return? Where would you put your money, an investment returning 5% or one returning 10%?</p>
<p>As for repairing the ones damaged by the two hurricanes, should we invest the money in companies that will create jobs for taxpayers, or should we simply hand the money out to the taxpayers while leaving them unemployed? Money invested in industrial projects circulates through the economy multiple times, money spent on social programs generates little economic return.</p>
<p>The problem is that many perfectly intelligent people like Peejz are being so inundated with socialist BS that it can become dificult to determine some of the more subtle facts like without profit, there is no investment. I understand that yes the oil companies make billions each year, but when it&#8217;s only a 5% return on their investment, they&#8217;re not good investments. If they didn&#8217;t make billions, they have no investors and would go out of business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peejz</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/07/are-new-refineries-the-answer/comment-page-1/#comment-193430</link>
		<dc:creator>Peejz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 14:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3419#comment-193430</guid>
		<description>I believe that the oil industry should be able to build these on their own with no subsidies from the government. With today&#039;s technology, they should not have the problems they faced 20 years ago. 20 years ago they were facing; revamping their existing equipment to meet new standards. Today they are looking at new equipment that is built with todays starndards in place. It is more cost efficient to go the route of new rather than revamp old. The payout to the stockholder is pretty much assured as the recouping of the cost will be quicker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that the oil industry should be able to build these on their own with no subsidies from the government. With today&#8217;s technology, they should not have the problems they faced 20 years ago. 20 years ago they were facing; revamping their existing equipment to meet new standards. Today they are looking at new equipment that is built with todays starndards in place. It is more cost efficient to go the route of new rather than revamp old. The payout to the stockholder is pretty much assured as the recouping of the cost will be quicker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrmrArtyOffcr</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/07/are-new-refineries-the-answer/comment-page-1/#comment-193428</link>
		<dc:creator>FrmrArtyOffcr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 14:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3419#comment-193428</guid>
		<description>Okay, let&#039;s put both sides of this argument together and take out the eco freak BS. Let&#039;s face facts folks, gasoline and other fossil fuls consumption is here to stay for the foreseeable future. We simply do not have enough refining capacity or for that matter electricity generating capacity to keep up with demand. Current laws require the addition of massive amounts of pollution control equipment anytime a power plant or refinery is even modestly repaired. As a result the cost of upgrading an older less efficient facility can double or triple simply because the owner not only has to pay for the upgrade, they also have to bring the remainder of the plant, which was previously grandfathered, into compliance with laws that were not even in existence when it was built. This requirement frequently makes modernization (read that as incresed efficiency and productivity with less waste) cost prohibitive. If the econazis are so damn concerned with cutting consumption and waste, why are they fighting so hard to prevent modernization that will do just that? 

Is there any business man out there who is going to tell his stock holders &quot;We&#039;re going to spend BILLIONS to improve efficiency at this facility by ten percent. I Know it&#039;s a lot of money and will take us 10 years to recoup the cost of the emissions retrofit, but then we&#039;ll be making some profits then.&quot; ? Why do the eco freaks think that every corporation has endlessly deep pockets? It&#039;s just not the case. Believe it or not people work for these companies to get paid, and that includes the investors who expect to make money (i.e. PROFIT) from their investments. 

As for hybrid and other technology cars, they&#039;re a great idea. Unfortunately the technology simply isn&#039;t advanced enough to be workable on the scale of the current gasoline engine. It simply needs to be developed more to bring the cost down to the point of affordability. Currently the price difference between a hybrid and a non hybrid model of the same vehicle is just cost prohibitive. There is a demand for the vehicles. This is evidenced by the fact that no manufacturer of hybrid vehicles can keep up with demand. Another technology that needs to be explored is the Northstar engine technology. It&#039;s far easier to put into a gasoline engine than a hybrid configuration. For those who don&#039;t know what the Cadillac Northstar engine does, let me explain. Vehicles only need a lot of torque and horsepower while accelerating. Once they achieve the desired speed, their horsepower and torque needs drop considerably. Basically it&#039;s Newton&#039;s law. A body in motion will stay in motion until acted upon by outside forces. Hence once the vehicles gets going as long as the engine produces enough power to overcome drag and a small amount of gravity. The way that the Northstar V8 engines work is that once the car gets up to speed, the Northstar computer reduces the number of cylinders that are firing to the lowest number necessary to maintain that speed. Going down a flat highway, the V8 may actually only be using 4 cylinders because it takes less than 100 horsepower to maintain speed. On a slight grade, it might start firing 2 more cylinders so that it would increase the horsepower to over 200 bhp to compensate for the grade. On a steep hill, all 8 cylinders would come online and give the vehicle a full 300+ horsepower to overcome the increase power requirement of the hill. If most vehicles were equipped with v6s or v8s set up this way, the fuel economy would be incredible. My truck has the largest, most fuel economical 4 cylinder on the market, but I know that if I load it very heavily, I will get worse fuel economy than a friend&#039;s similarly sized v8.  If it were available with a Northstar equipped v6, I would get better economy in all situations. Personally if I had had the extra $10,000 to spend I would&#039;ve loved the new Hybrid Silverado. However increasing my vehicle purchase price by 50% would&#039;ve made it unaffordable.

Basically while the call for more fuel efficient vehicles is admirable, the facts are that we have to deal with our current situation first and let the technology develop accordingly. That takes time and since noone wants to walk miles carrying groceries in a backpack on a routine basis, let&#039;s build the refineries and upgrade the power plants to handle the need in the interim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, let&#8217;s put both sides of this argument together and take out the eco freak BS. Let&#8217;s face facts folks, gasoline and other fossil fuls consumption is here to stay for the foreseeable future. We simply do not have enough refining capacity or for that matter electricity generating capacity to keep up with demand. Current laws require the addition of massive amounts of pollution control equipment anytime a power plant or refinery is even modestly repaired. As a result the cost of upgrading an older less efficient facility can double or triple simply because the owner not only has to pay for the upgrade, they also have to bring the remainder of the plant, which was previously grandfathered, into compliance with laws that were not even in existence when it was built. This requirement frequently makes modernization (read that as incresed efficiency and productivity with less waste) cost prohibitive. If the econazis are so damn concerned with cutting consumption and waste, why are they fighting so hard to prevent modernization that will do just that? </p>
<p>Is there any business man out there who is going to tell his stock holders &#8220;We&#8217;re going to spend BILLIONS to improve efficiency at this facility by ten percent. I Know it&#8217;s a lot of money and will take us 10 years to recoup the cost of the emissions retrofit, but then we&#8217;ll be making some profits then.&#8221; ? Why do the eco freaks think that every corporation has endlessly deep pockets? It&#8217;s just not the case. Believe it or not people work for these companies to get paid, and that includes the investors who expect to make money (i.e. PROFIT) from their investments. </p>
<p>As for hybrid and other technology cars, they&#8217;re a great idea. Unfortunately the technology simply isn&#8217;t advanced enough to be workable on the scale of the current gasoline engine. It simply needs to be developed more to bring the cost down to the point of affordability. Currently the price difference between a hybrid and a non hybrid model of the same vehicle is just cost prohibitive. There is a demand for the vehicles. This is evidenced by the fact that no manufacturer of hybrid vehicles can keep up with demand. Another technology that needs to be explored is the Northstar engine technology. It&#8217;s far easier to put into a gasoline engine than a hybrid configuration. For those who don&#8217;t know what the Cadillac Northstar engine does, let me explain. Vehicles only need a lot of torque and horsepower while accelerating. Once they achieve the desired speed, their horsepower and torque needs drop considerably. Basically it&#8217;s Newton&#8217;s law. A body in motion will stay in motion until acted upon by outside forces. Hence once the vehicles gets going as long as the engine produces enough power to overcome drag and a small amount of gravity. The way that the Northstar V8 engines work is that once the car gets up to speed, the Northstar computer reduces the number of cylinders that are firing to the lowest number necessary to maintain that speed. Going down a flat highway, the V8 may actually only be using 4 cylinders because it takes less than 100 horsepower to maintain speed. On a slight grade, it might start firing 2 more cylinders so that it would increase the horsepower to over 200 bhp to compensate for the grade. On a steep hill, all 8 cylinders would come online and give the vehicle a full 300+ horsepower to overcome the increase power requirement of the hill. If most vehicles were equipped with v6s or v8s set up this way, the fuel economy would be incredible. My truck has the largest, most fuel economical 4 cylinder on the market, but I know that if I load it very heavily, I will get worse fuel economy than a friend&#8217;s similarly sized v8.  If it were available with a Northstar equipped v6, I would get better economy in all situations. Personally if I had had the extra $10,000 to spend I would&#8217;ve loved the new Hybrid Silverado. However increasing my vehicle purchase price by 50% would&#8217;ve made it unaffordable.</p>
<p>Basically while the call for more fuel efficient vehicles is admirable, the facts are that we have to deal with our current situation first and let the technology develop accordingly. That takes time and since noone wants to walk miles carrying groceries in a backpack on a routine basis, let&#8217;s build the refineries and upgrade the power plants to handle the need in the interim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snowy egret</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/07/are-new-refineries-the-answer/comment-page-1/#comment-193423</link>
		<dc:creator>snowy egret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 13:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3419#comment-193423</guid>
		<description>We need to start drilling in the ANWR and quit listening to the ec-freaks and stop depending on OPEC we can no longer allow ourselves to deoend on OPEC:wink:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need to start drilling in the ANWR and quit listening to the ec-freaks and stop depending on OPEC we can no longer allow ourselves to deoend on OPEC:wink:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Dawes</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/07/are-new-refineries-the-answer/comment-page-1/#comment-193416</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Dawes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 08:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3419#comment-193416</guid>
		<description>Chad Snyder, just said it all, but our non government will not follow up on any-kind of real reason to help &quot;Americans&quot; and logic is not part of this non government, just look at the borders. Our government is not looking for any kind of real energy policy that would make this nation free of the rats of the world becuase our government is owned by the rats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chad Snyder, just said it all, but our non government will not follow up on any-kind of real reason to help &#8220;Americans&#8221; and logic is not part of this non government, just look at the borders. Our government is not looking for any kind of real energy policy that would make this nation free of the rats of the world becuase our government is owned by the rats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Snyder</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/07/are-new-refineries-the-answer/comment-page-1/#comment-193410</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Snyder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 02:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3419#comment-193410</guid>
		<description>No I don&#039;t think we need refineries, I think we need real congressional action, real investment in America.

Instead of oil refineries and billions in tax incentives for oil drilling, why not fund diesel &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.soultek.com/clean_energy/hybrid_cars/hybrid_cars.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;hybrid cars&lt;/a&gt;?

Such vehicles could end foreign oil dependency, salvage the American auto industry, and save America as much as a trillion dollars (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hybridcarrevolution.com/hybrid_cars_articles/hybrid_cars_could_save_america_a_trillion_dollars.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;more on this angle&lt;/a&gt;)

Technology can enable America to move beyond oil, especially foreign oil. Isn&#039;t it about time?

&lt;a href=&quot;www.hybridcarblog.com&quot;&gt;Chad Snyder&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No I don&#8217;t think we need refineries, I think we need real congressional action, real investment in America.</p>
<p>Instead of oil refineries and billions in tax incentives for oil drilling, why not fund diesel <a href="http://www.soultek.com/clean_energy/hybrid_cars/hybrid_cars.htm" rel="nofollow">hybrid cars</a>?</p>
<p>Such vehicles could end foreign oil dependency, salvage the American auto industry, and save America as much as a trillion dollars (<a href="http://www.hybridcarrevolution.com/hybrid_cars_articles/hybrid_cars_could_save_america_a_trillion_dollars.htm" rel="nofollow">more on this angle</a>)</p>
<p>Technology can enable America to move beyond oil, especially foreign oil. Isn&#8217;t it about time?</p>
<p><a href="www.hybridcarblog.com">Chad Snyder</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

