Comments on: Ronnie Earle may have some explaining to do

By: PCD

PCD — Mon, 10 Oct 2005 13:01:58 +0000

8, you mean no one to point out the person interviewed was a partisan hack and what he said was pure Barbara Streisand. Then, you libs wonder why the conservatives say PBS is biased and should be cut off from taxpayer dollars?

By: Zelda

Zelda — Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:36:10 +0000

6. I forget what they were, but he sounded reasonable. Of course there was no one to counter his views.

By: Zelda

Zelda — Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:33:38 +0000

5. Opps, too much crack pipe.

By: PCD

PCD — Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:27:51 +0000

2, what, in your mind, constitutes good credentials?

By: Sasha

Sasha — Mon, 10 Oct 2005 02:06:30 +0000

2: (Z, DeLay is not a senator.)

By: Zelda

Zelda — Mon, 10 Oct 2005 01:58:31 +0000

I think in the end Justice will be served. The truth will come out.

Years from now, the truth about President Bush will be out also. Did he do a good job or not? I don’t know, but he will have had 8 years. Historians will have a lot to think about and judge him by. I hope he can “fix”Iraq.

By: peejz

peejz — Mon, 10 Oct 2005 01:53:34 +0000

Between the movie and the number of grand juries, I long ago gave up on Earle. For the sake of an arguement, let’s say Earle has the goods on Delay and Delay is guilty…any lawyer worth his fee can get him off based onb Earles behaviour alone!

By: Zelda

Zelda — Mon, 10 Oct 2005 01:30:31 +0000

This case is very interesting to me. On NPR, I heard some guy with good credentials who said that DA Earle was unbiased. However, as time goes by I think maybe Senator Delay is innocent of these charges and DA Earle is a hack. Either way, I think in the end Justice will be served.

(NPR is not unbiased)

By: Fred Dawes

Fred Dawes — Sun, 09 Oct 2005 01:16:10 +0000

Is Tom out of jail yet?