<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Riots in Ohio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/16/riots-in-ohio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/16/riots-in-ohio/</link>
	<description>in all matter of opinion, our adversaries are insane.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 14:43:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobbie</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/16/riots-in-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-199097</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 23:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3449#comment-199097</guid>
		<description>Peejz, you are not to reasoned with. You have your mind set and no amount of documentation will make a difference to you, much less common sense. 

If I had been there in the neighborhood I would have made sure that me and my family were not in harms way. I would not have wanted to be among the gangs or Neo Nazis. People, especially knowing of the problems that would arise should have stayed off the streets. Although they have a right to be out in the streets and on their porches or what ever, common sense prevented most law abiding people from being exposed to the mess that took place. Why would one walk out into a &quot;war zone&quot;

As far as suing the city, get real. The police are public servants and there to protect and serve ALL. And it sounds as though they did the best they could. Where have you been, the last several years? One can not stop all of the evil and terrorism all of the time, in fact not much of the time LAWFULLY. When there are NO MORALS, and NO RESPECT there is no amount reasoning or begging that will make the difference.

There is no way the police could have prevented what happened, unless like I said earlier, they had the total support of the people in their city and dealt with the gangs as they appeared from the beginning. 

If these thugs knew that their violence was going to be meant with violence this would not have happened. I deplore violence, but sometimes when there is no way to reason with the animals some have become then you treat them as the wild animals they choose to be.

I have said enough about this...it is a dead issue and falls upon deaf ears.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peejz, you are not to reasoned with. You have your mind set and no amount of documentation will make a difference to you, much less common sense. </p>
<p>If I had been there in the neighborhood I would have made sure that me and my family were not in harms way. I would not have wanted to be among the gangs or Neo Nazis. People, especially knowing of the problems that would arise should have stayed off the streets. Although they have a right to be out in the streets and on their porches or what ever, common sense prevented most law abiding people from being exposed to the mess that took place. Why would one walk out into a &#8220;war zone&#8221;</p>
<p>As far as suing the city, get real. The police are public servants and there to protect and serve ALL. And it sounds as though they did the best they could. Where have you been, the last several years? One can not stop all of the evil and terrorism all of the time, in fact not much of the time LAWFULLY. When there are NO MORALS, and NO RESPECT there is no amount reasoning or begging that will make the difference.</p>
<p>There is no way the police could have prevented what happened, unless like I said earlier, they had the total support of the people in their city and dealt with the gangs as they appeared from the beginning. </p>
<p>If these thugs knew that their violence was going to be meant with violence this would not have happened. I deplore violence, but sometimes when there is no way to reason with the animals some have become then you treat them as the wild animals they choose to be.</p>
<p>I have said enough about this&#8230;it is a dead issue and falls upon deaf ears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peejz</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/16/riots-in-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-199037</link>
		<dc:creator>Peejz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 21:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3449#comment-199037</guid>
		<description>46- FOA I am not missing any point. The citizens have a right to be protected. They pay taxes for it. There is more than 1 amendment to the COTUS that is involved here.  And the nazis had not left prior to the riots starting. This has nothing to do with PC attitudes. The Nazis came to Toledo to cause this very problem. It had nothing to do with gangs and everything to do with hatred. I am sorry you can&#039;t see it.  And yes, the citizens can and will sue the city.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>46- FOA I am not missing any point. The citizens have a right to be protected. They pay taxes for it. There is more than 1 amendment to the COTUS that is involved here.  And the nazis had not left prior to the riots starting. This has nothing to do with PC attitudes. The Nazis came to Toledo to cause this very problem. It had nothing to do with gangs and everything to do with hatred. I am sorry you can&#8217;t see it.  And yes, the citizens can and will sue the city.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frmrartyoffcr</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/16/riots-in-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-199004</link>
		<dc:creator>frmrartyoffcr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 20:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3449#comment-199004</guid>
		<description>Peej. You still aren&#039;t getting it. The Constitution protects the rights of people to verbally express themselves. That means it doesn&#039;t matter whether the rioters liked what the neonazis were saying or not, the police were not allowed to stop them from saying it. The &quot;innocent&quot; residents of that neighborhood have no grounds for a lawsuit against the city. The Police, the Mayor, and a minister all addressed the crowd and tried to get them to stand down because the Neonazis had already left BEFORE the rioting started. The fact that the neonazis had already left didn&#039;t matter, the thugs were only using the neonazis presence as an excuse to riot. 

Like it or not, there is a phrase that needs to be taught in school throughout this country from the time kids walk in the door. This phrase is the very basis for any political argument. That phrase is &quot;I don&#039;t agree with what you have to say, but I will fight to the death for your right to say it.&quot; 

From your posts, it appears that you have become thoroughly indoctrinated in the Liberal left&#039;s theory of political correctness. That theory can be summed up as &quot;You can say anything you want as long as it doesn&#039;t offend a minority that might conceivably be swayed to vote for a Democrat.&quot; Any and all bigoted remarks aimed at straight, white, non handicapped Christian males are completely acceptable.

Fortunately, that&#039;s NOT how the Constitution is written. Believe it or not, if the police had tried to stop the neonazis from walking on the public sidewalks, the ACLU would&#039;ve sued the city for stopping them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peej. You still aren&#8217;t getting it. The Constitution protects the rights of people to verbally express themselves. That means it doesn&#8217;t matter whether the rioters liked what the neonazis were saying or not, the police were not allowed to stop them from saying it. The &#8220;innocent&#8221; residents of that neighborhood have no grounds for a lawsuit against the city. The Police, the Mayor, and a minister all addressed the crowd and tried to get them to stand down because the Neonazis had already left BEFORE the rioting started. The fact that the neonazis had already left didn&#8217;t matter, the thugs were only using the neonazis presence as an excuse to riot. </p>
<p>Like it or not, there is a phrase that needs to be taught in school throughout this country from the time kids walk in the door. This phrase is the very basis for any political argument. That phrase is &#8220;I don&#8217;t agree with what you have to say, but I will fight to the death for your right to say it.&#8221; </p>
<p>From your posts, it appears that you have become thoroughly indoctrinated in the Liberal left&#8217;s theory of political correctness. That theory can be summed up as &#8220;You can say anything you want as long as it doesn&#8217;t offend a minority that might conceivably be swayed to vote for a Democrat.&#8221; Any and all bigoted remarks aimed at straight, white, non handicapped Christian males are completely acceptable.</p>
<p>Fortunately, that&#8217;s NOT how the Constitution is written. Believe it or not, if the police had tried to stop the neonazis from walking on the public sidewalks, the ACLU would&#8217;ve sued the city for stopping them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peejz</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/16/riots-in-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-198732</link>
		<dc:creator>Peejz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 11:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3449#comment-198732</guid>
		<description>FOA- first of all, I am no liberal defending the actions of any rioter. Secondly, I am not defending the rioting, and yes the criminal code will be and should be used against the lawbreakers. But the innocent citizens have access to the courts as well, and they can and will be suing the city and police department. As it should be.
Thirdly, What kind of an example is the Gaurdian Angels? Don&#039;t they promote cleaning up the streets and protecting all citizens from all forms of crime?  But had they been the ones protesting and the cops denied their march, gotten word on the streets that the asian gangs would cause problems if the GA come into their area, and the result is the the GA tried to march right through the neighborhood where innocent people live, then I would still put fault on the cops for not preventing the situation and if rioters go to jail, so be it. And lastly, You say you shot the guy. Was the guy on your property during a B/E and your life felt threatened? Yes, I would defend you. Did you go down the street and got your own form of justice by just shooting the guy? To a certain extent I would defend you. Since everyone in the area knows the house is a drug house, a house known to have drug dealers and theives in it, why hasn&#039;t it been targeted by the cops?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FOA- first of all, I am no liberal defending the actions of any rioter. Secondly, I am not defending the rioting, and yes the criminal code will be and should be used against the lawbreakers. But the innocent citizens have access to the courts as well, and they can and will be suing the city and police department. As it should be.<br />
Thirdly, What kind of an example is the Gaurdian Angels? Don&#8217;t they promote cleaning up the streets and protecting all citizens from all forms of crime?  But had they been the ones protesting and the cops denied their march, gotten word on the streets that the asian gangs would cause problems if the GA come into their area, and the result is the the GA tried to march right through the neighborhood where innocent people live, then I would still put fault on the cops for not preventing the situation and if rioters go to jail, so be it. And lastly, You say you shot the guy. Was the guy on your property during a B/E and your life felt threatened? Yes, I would defend you. Did you go down the street and got your own form of justice by just shooting the guy? To a certain extent I would defend you. Since everyone in the area knows the house is a drug house, a house known to have drug dealers and theives in it, why hasn&#8217;t it been targeted by the cops?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrmrArtyOffcr</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/16/riots-in-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-198529</link>
		<dc:creator>FrmrArtyOffcr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 05:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3449#comment-198529</guid>
		<description>Here is a case of the liberals defending the rights of the lawless to behave that way because of a supposed slight by some morons. I&#039;m going to break this down to the basest level. &lt;em&gt;Even if the NeoNazis began screaming racial slurs, they have the right to do so.&lt;/em&gt; &lt;strong&gt;The counter protestors DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO THROW ROCKS AND RIOT. UNDER VIRTUALLY NO CIRCUMSTANCES IS RESPONDING TO VERBAL STATEMENTS WITH PHYSICAL VIOLENCE ACCEPTABLE BEHAVIOR.&lt;/strong&gt; The reason for the virtually is that when those statements are viable threats to life and limb, one should be allowed to defend themselves.

Peej you tell others to do more research. Do some yourself. Might I suggest the 1st amendment to the Constitution and the criminal code for any given state? I&#039;m certain that you will find that the freedom to express oneself verbally is guaranteed in the Constitution, but the hurling of baseball sized rocks at individuals who are not doing so first is considered, your choice depending on state, Assault with a deadly weapon, Aggravated Assault, Attempted Murder, etc etc. While some in the liberal left might try to claim that it is in fact an acceptable form of speech, the criminal code will surely disagree, and though juries can be pretty damn wierd at times, the courts will almost certainly side with the criminal code.

BTW Peej, would your defense of the rioters be so vociferous were the protestors the Guardian Angels in their red sateen jackets and red berets? Or is it only okay to riot, assault police officers, destroy public and private property when you&#039;re insulted by some morons&#039; racist comments? If so, will you defend me if I put a few rounds into some of the radical blacks who&#039;s racist comments offend me? There&#039;s also a housing project down the street that has a few drug dealers in it. Their drug dealing has resulted in my property being stolen and my feeling violated. Since that hurts my self esteem, should I go down there on a shooting and burning rampage? Whatever happened to sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will never hurt me? Peej as Robert said, you&#039;re defending the indefensible. The NeoNazis are morons but even morons have the right to non violently gather and protest on public property.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a case of the liberals defending the rights of the lawless to behave that way because of a supposed slight by some morons. I&#8217;m going to break this down to the basest level. <em>Even if the NeoNazis began screaming racial slurs, they have the right to do so.</em> <strong>The counter protestors DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO THROW ROCKS AND RIOT. UNDER VIRTUALLY NO CIRCUMSTANCES IS RESPONDING TO VERBAL STATEMENTS WITH PHYSICAL VIOLENCE ACCEPTABLE BEHAVIOR.</strong> The reason for the virtually is that when those statements are viable threats to life and limb, one should be allowed to defend themselves.</p>
<p>Peej you tell others to do more research. Do some yourself. Might I suggest the 1st amendment to the Constitution and the criminal code for any given state? I&#8217;m certain that you will find that the freedom to express oneself verbally is guaranteed in the Constitution, but the hurling of baseball sized rocks at individuals who are not doing so first is considered, your choice depending on state, Assault with a deadly weapon, Aggravated Assault, Attempted Murder, etc etc. While some in the liberal left might try to claim that it is in fact an acceptable form of speech, the criminal code will surely disagree, and though juries can be pretty damn wierd at times, the courts will almost certainly side with the criminal code.</p>
<p>BTW Peej, would your defense of the rioters be so vociferous were the protestors the Guardian Angels in their red sateen jackets and red berets? Or is it only okay to riot, assault police officers, destroy public and private property when you&#8217;re insulted by some morons&#8217; racist comments? If so, will you defend me if I put a few rounds into some of the radical blacks who&#8217;s racist comments offend me? There&#8217;s also a housing project down the street that has a few drug dealers in it. Their drug dealing has resulted in my property being stolen and my feeling violated. Since that hurts my self esteem, should I go down there on a shooting and burning rampage? Whatever happened to sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will never hurt me? Peej as Robert said, you&#8217;re defending the indefensible. The NeoNazis are morons but even morons have the right to non violently gather and protest on public property.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobbie</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/16/riots-in-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-198408</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 01:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3449#comment-198408</guid>
		<description>OK here it is:&lt;em&gt;Police began receiving word midweek that gangs were going to descend on a neighborhood where a riot erupted over a planned march&lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;Officers who work in the area reported that gang members were planning to turn out in force&lt;/em&gt; 
regardless of who the protesters were, or what race they were, the lawless had made up their mind to take over the situation! 

&lt;em&gt;The riot broke out Saturday when protesters confronted members of the National Socialist Movement who had gathered at a city park. Rioters threw baseball-sized rocks at police, vandalized vehicles and stores, and set fire to a neighborhood bar&lt;/em&gt; these protesters that were causing a riot were the gangs, and those going along with the lawless acts. It was not the protesters walking down the sidewalk.

As you said in post 6.&lt;em&gt;I would love to know if the cops made even the slightest attempt to reach out to the gang members to try to keep the peace. I would bet they didn&#039;t. I can&#039;t help but wonder had they done that , if things might not have turned so ugly.&lt;/em&gt; Reach out to the Gang members?! Come on, these are lawless, criminals! Why should the police have to reach out to them?! Are you saying you are a bleeding heart for those of so called legitimated circumstances? Please many people are poor or live in poverty, many are uneducated and DO NOT resort to forming gangs to rule their areas, taking what they want, when they want. Honestly you sound as though you are one of those who are afraid of retaliation. 

These gang members are not in their 40&#039;s, 50&#039;s or 60&#039;s, they have had the many opportunity&#039;s of organizations reaching out to them.  They have learned they will be catered to, or be feared. They need to know they will pay the price for their actions. It could be you or your place or family they turn on next. Would you feel the same about reaching out to them, or blaming the police if it were you or your brother that had been injured, or your place that had been burned.  THERE IS NO EXCUSE for the riots and destruction.

Then you say in 8.&lt;em&gt;If the gangs are causing trouble, is that not the job of the police and city leaders to take care of the situation? &lt;/em&gt; yes, but only if they have your and every citizens support can they take care of the problems. When you have neighbors, family, friends, and people (just because they are of the same race or affiliation) defending,lying covering for them, how can the police do anything?

It appears from your writings that you detest the Neo-Nazi&#039;s. And because of their walking down the sidewalk in protest and the police having not run them out of town, they caused this horrible event. Many people come from different places across the country to protest with their group of choice, so the fact that they were not from there makes no difference. I can&#039;t imagine that when they,(or anyone one protesting)seen hundreds of faces of people who hated them, especially those of gang members, that they would START the riot by yelling out racial slurs. Some people are very stupid though.

First I would like you to know that I don&#039;t care for any racist organization, including those of gangs, but if they feel they have a statement to make and do so lawfully, then their protest should not be met with violence, but looked upon with pity, or even disgust.

There was no way to have avoided this incident, short of dealing with the gangs beforehand, (gangs should never be tolerated any place in our society), and denying a person their right to walk down a sidewalk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK here it is:<em>Police began receiving word midweek that gangs were going to descend on a neighborhood where a riot erupted over a planned march</em> <em>Officers who work in the area reported that gang members were planning to turn out in force</em><br />
regardless of who the protesters were, or what race they were, the lawless had made up their mind to take over the situation! </p>
<p><em>The riot broke out Saturday when protesters confronted members of the National Socialist Movement who had gathered at a city park. Rioters threw baseball-sized rocks at police, vandalized vehicles and stores, and set fire to a neighborhood bar</em> these protesters that were causing a riot were the gangs, and those going along with the lawless acts. It was not the protesters walking down the sidewalk.</p>
<p>As you said in post 6.<em>I would love to know if the cops made even the slightest attempt to reach out to the gang members to try to keep the peace. I would bet they didn&#8217;t. I can&#8217;t help but wonder had they done that , if things might not have turned so ugly.</em> Reach out to the Gang members?! Come on, these are lawless, criminals! Why should the police have to reach out to them?! Are you saying you are a bleeding heart for those of so called legitimated circumstances? Please many people are poor or live in poverty, many are uneducated and DO NOT resort to forming gangs to rule their areas, taking what they want, when they want. Honestly you sound as though you are one of those who are afraid of retaliation. </p>
<p>These gang members are not in their 40&#8242;s, 50&#8242;s or 60&#8242;s, they have had the many opportunity&#8217;s of organizations reaching out to them.  They have learned they will be catered to, or be feared. They need to know they will pay the price for their actions. It could be you or your place or family they turn on next. Would you feel the same about reaching out to them, or blaming the police if it were you or your brother that had been injured, or your place that had been burned.  THERE IS NO EXCUSE for the riots and destruction.</p>
<p>Then you say in 8.<em>If the gangs are causing trouble, is that not the job of the police and city leaders to take care of the situation? </em> yes, but only if they have your and every citizens support can they take care of the problems. When you have neighbors, family, friends, and people (just because they are of the same race or affiliation) defending,lying covering for them, how can the police do anything?</p>
<p>It appears from your writings that you detest the Neo-Nazi&#8217;s. And because of their walking down the sidewalk in protest and the police having not run them out of town, they caused this horrible event. Many people come from different places across the country to protest with their group of choice, so the fact that they were not from there makes no difference. I can&#8217;t imagine that when they,(or anyone one protesting)seen hundreds of faces of people who hated them, especially those of gang members, that they would START the riot by yelling out racial slurs. Some people are very stupid though.</p>
<p>First I would like you to know that I don&#8217;t care for any racist organization, including those of gangs, but if they feel they have a statement to make and do so lawfully, then their protest should not be met with violence, but looked upon with pity, or even disgust.</p>
<p>There was no way to have avoided this incident, short of dealing with the gangs beforehand, (gangs should never be tolerated any place in our society), and denying a person their right to walk down a sidewalk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peejz</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/16/riots-in-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-198368</link>
		<dc:creator>Peejz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3449#comment-198368</guid>
		<description>41- It means what it says. Do a bit more research on the situation. These people came from different chapters of America&#039;s Socialist Party, from all over the country. They were there to protest a dispute between a black man and a white woman. They plan to go from town to town do much the same thing. Stir up racial problems. As the counter  protestors lined up with their signs telling the Nazis to take their hate home, the Nazis started yelling the racial slurs. Is it justification to burn a town down? no. Could it have been avoided? yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>41- It means what it says. Do a bit more research on the situation. These people came from different chapters of America&#8217;s Socialist Party, from all over the country. They were there to protest a dispute between a black man and a white woman. They plan to go from town to town do much the same thing. Stir up racial problems. As the counter  protestors lined up with their signs telling the Nazis to take their hate home, the Nazis started yelling the racial slurs. Is it justification to burn a town down? no. Could it have been avoided? yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobbie</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/16/riots-in-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-198361</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3449#comment-198361</guid>
		<description>40. Yelling of racial slurs is not right! Yelling, screaming, throwing, pushing is not right.  I said that we as American citizens have a right to protest in a civil manner. You do know the meaning of civil don&#039;t you? And I don&#039;t understand what you mean by: &lt;em&gt;Coming into town to protest a dispute between 2 people and not gang violence is okay with you? &lt;/em&gt; That is pretty ridiculous. And you are right many people do own guns besides the criminal, but in many places they are a criminal for owning them according to some local, state laws.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>40. Yelling of racial slurs is not right! Yelling, screaming, throwing, pushing is not right.  I said that we as American citizens have a right to protest in a civil manner. You do know the meaning of civil don&#8217;t you? And I don&#8217;t understand what you mean by: <em>Coming into town to protest a dispute between 2 people and not gang violence is okay with you? </em> That is pretty ridiculous. And you are right many people do own guns besides the criminal, but in many places they are a criminal for owning them according to some local, state laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peejz</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/16/riots-in-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-198356</link>
		<dc:creator>Peejz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3449#comment-198356</guid>
		<description>39-&lt;em&gt;And we have a right as US citizens to speak our minds and protest in a civil manner, but when &quot;all hell breaks loose&quot;because of those who refuse to act with respect and choose lawlessness to get their point across, &quot;vent&quot;or take advantage of a situation, then they should be stopped by whatever means it takes, arrested and punished to the fullest, and no decent person should step up to make excuses for their behavior or defend their actions in any manner.&lt;/em&gt;- So the yelling of racial slurs was alright with you? Coming into town to protest a dispute between 2 people and not gang violence is okay with you?
&lt;em&gt;As it is now only the criminals, only the terrorist have weapons, they fear nothing.&lt;/em&gt;- lots of people that have no criminal record own guns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>39-<em>And we have a right as US citizens to speak our minds and protest in a civil manner, but when &#8220;all hell breaks loose&#8221;because of those who refuse to act with respect and choose lawlessness to get their point across, &#8220;vent&#8221;or take advantage of a situation, then they should be stopped by whatever means it takes, arrested and punished to the fullest, and no decent person should step up to make excuses for their behavior or defend their actions in any manner.</em>- So the yelling of racial slurs was alright with you? Coming into town to protest a dispute between 2 people and not gang violence is okay with you?<br />
<em>As it is now only the criminals, only the terrorist have weapons, they fear nothing.</em>- lots of people that have no criminal record own guns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobbie</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/16/riots-in-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-198344</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 23:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3449#comment-198344</guid>
		<description>32.FrmrArtyOffcr I agree with you totally.  You sound like an intelligent person, fair in judgment and one who speakers the truth. Facts are facts, and you can&#039;t change that.
 
There is NO excuse for rioting and violent behavior. Looting, Burning, and Destruction should not be tolerated anywhere, at anytime in a civil society, which is what we are supposed to be. (Look at New Orleans, and in a time of devastation leaving everyone vulnerable.) It looks more and more as though we here in the USA have lost all respect for our selves, our families, loved ones, neighbors, educators, and our local, state and federal governments.   

I can understand people losing faith in their political leaders and even in many of our law enforcement officers as well as our Judaical system. But it is our own fault for electing and keeping the elected officials in place when they fail to protect our constitutional rights and become &quot;yes men/women&quot; to appease the rich and minority groups. The Constitution states that they &quot;Majority&quot; shall rule.  Those with the same thoughts and desires to keep our society civil, safe and free.

Right is right and wrong is wrong, regardless of race, gender, religion or political preference. And we have a right as US citizens to speak our minds and protest in a civil manner, but when &quot;all hell breaks loose&quot; because of those who refuse to act with respect and choose lawlessness to get their point across, &quot;vent&quot; or take advantage of a situation, then they should be stopped by whatever means it takes, arrested and punished to the fullest, and no decent person should step up to make excuses for their behavior or defend their actions in any manner.

If we allow these minority groups and leaders to gain publicity in defending the actions of the lawless and those who intend or intended to cause harm to others, destroy others property, rob and threaten, then we are allowing &quot;terrorist&quot; (which is what gangs are too)to run our cities and our country. Out of &quot;fear of retaliation&quot; many choose to sit back and accept what these minority leaders and terrorist say and do. And we have created that fear by allowing the lawless to take over. Because we refuse to get involved and stand up for what this country stood for and was at one time many years ago.  A time when our &quot;forefathers&quot; were strong,caring individuals with respect for their fellow countrymen and demanded peace and protection for their families and neighbors.  Remember this is one reason they gave us a &quot;right to bear arms&quot; in our constitution, so that we would not have to live in &quot;fear&quot; of the lawless. As it is now only the criminals, only the terrorist have weapons, they fear nothing. They have our &quot;Politically Correct&quot; government on their side, they have the minority leaders on their side, and the have the fearful public on their side. When and how did we decide to give illegal aliens and criminals the right to protection under our constitution?!  

We will not have, nor can we expect a change in our society until we as the citizens of this great country, decide enough is enough! And demand that each individual takes responsibility for his or her actions, that parents are responsible for their children&#039;s behavior and that our law enforcement, Judaical system, and government do their job as it was intended to be done. If they don&#039;t impeach them, lodge formal complaints, don&#039;t re-elect the people that are in place and &quot;go along&quot; with the way things are. For your sake and your families sake, GET INVOLVED.

Wake up people. Quit being led like &quot;sheep to the slaughter&quot;. Remember it is God first, then our country for the good of all.

Bobbie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>32.FrmrArtyOffcr I agree with you totally.  You sound like an intelligent person, fair in judgment and one who speakers the truth. Facts are facts, and you can&#8217;t change that.</p>
<p>There is NO excuse for rioting and violent behavior. Looting, Burning, and Destruction should not be tolerated anywhere, at anytime in a civil society, which is what we are supposed to be. (Look at New Orleans, and in a time of devastation leaving everyone vulnerable.) It looks more and more as though we here in the USA have lost all respect for our selves, our families, loved ones, neighbors, educators, and our local, state and federal governments.   </p>
<p>I can understand people losing faith in their political leaders and even in many of our law enforcement officers as well as our Judaical system. But it is our own fault for electing and keeping the elected officials in place when they fail to protect our constitutional rights and become &#8220;yes men/women&#8221; to appease the rich and minority groups. The Constitution states that they &#8220;Majority&#8221; shall rule.  Those with the same thoughts and desires to keep our society civil, safe and free.</p>
<p>Right is right and wrong is wrong, regardless of race, gender, religion or political preference. And we have a right as US citizens to speak our minds and protest in a civil manner, but when &#8220;all hell breaks loose&#8221; because of those who refuse to act with respect and choose lawlessness to get their point across, &#8220;vent&#8221; or take advantage of a situation, then they should be stopped by whatever means it takes, arrested and punished to the fullest, and no decent person should step up to make excuses for their behavior or defend their actions in any manner.</p>
<p>If we allow these minority groups and leaders to gain publicity in defending the actions of the lawless and those who intend or intended to cause harm to others, destroy others property, rob and threaten, then we are allowing &#8220;terrorist&#8221; (which is what gangs are too)to run our cities and our country. Out of &#8220;fear of retaliation&#8221; many choose to sit back and accept what these minority leaders and terrorist say and do. And we have created that fear by allowing the lawless to take over. Because we refuse to get involved and stand up for what this country stood for and was at one time many years ago.  A time when our &#8220;forefathers&#8221; were strong,caring individuals with respect for their fellow countrymen and demanded peace and protection for their families and neighbors.  Remember this is one reason they gave us a &#8220;right to bear arms&#8221; in our constitution, so that we would not have to live in &#8220;fear&#8221; of the lawless. As it is now only the criminals, only the terrorist have weapons, they fear nothing. They have our &#8220;Politically Correct&#8221; government on their side, they have the minority leaders on their side, and the have the fearful public on their side. When and how did we decide to give illegal aliens and criminals the right to protection under our constitution?!  </p>
<p>We will not have, nor can we expect a change in our society until we as the citizens of this great country, decide enough is enough! And demand that each individual takes responsibility for his or her actions, that parents are responsible for their children&#8217;s behavior and that our law enforcement, Judaical system, and government do their job as it was intended to be done. If they don&#8217;t impeach them, lodge formal complaints, don&#8217;t re-elect the people that are in place and &#8220;go along&#8221; with the way things are. For your sake and your families sake, GET INVOLVED.</p>
<p>Wake up people. Quit being led like &#8220;sheep to the slaughter&#8221;. Remember it is God first, then our country for the good of all.</p>
<p>Bobbie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

