<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hillary has some thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/26/hillary-has-some-thoughts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/26/hillary-has-some-thoughts/</link>
	<description>in all matter of opinion, our adversaries are insane.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 14:43:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: peejz</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/26/hillary-has-some-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-202102</link>
		<dc:creator>peejz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 21:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3477#comment-202102</guid>
		<description>18-We think more alike than not!:wink:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>18-We think more alike than not!:wink:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frmrartyoffcr</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/26/hillary-has-some-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-202020</link>
		<dc:creator>frmrartyoffcr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3477#comment-202020</guid>
		<description>Considering the President&#039;s MBA from Harvard and his proven ability to do strategic planning, I have to wonder if Harriet Meiers is a smoke screen. What will the American public&#039;s reaction be if the Dems go ape over Meiers not having a judicial record, etc etc and therefore not qualified, only to have President Bush then nominate Janet Rogers Brown, or Priscilla Owens? The public would have a canary if the Dems then started to argue about the second nominee not being qualified after blowing off the first one. Especially if the second one is an African American female. Let the Dems burn up a ton of good will with the public over Meiers and see how they have to react to an Owens, Brown, or Luttig nomination. Justice Stevens isn&#039;t exactly a spring chicken either. He could end up stepping down or dying before the 2008 elections too. He&#039;s over 80 and those elections are over 3 years away. A lot can happen to an octogenerian in 3 years. This could very easily be an ambush in the making.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering the President&#8217;s MBA from Harvard and his proven ability to do strategic planning, I have to wonder if Harriet Meiers is a smoke screen. What will the American public&#8217;s reaction be if the Dems go ape over Meiers not having a judicial record, etc etc and therefore not qualified, only to have President Bush then nominate Janet Rogers Brown, or Priscilla Owens? The public would have a canary if the Dems then started to argue about the second nominee not being qualified after blowing off the first one. Especially if the second one is an African American female. Let the Dems burn up a ton of good will with the public over Meiers and see how they have to react to an Owens, Brown, or Luttig nomination. Justice Stevens isn&#8217;t exactly a spring chicken either. He could end up stepping down or dying before the 2008 elections too. He&#8217;s over 80 and those elections are over 3 years away. A lot can happen to an octogenerian in 3 years. This could very easily be an ambush in the making.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PCD</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/26/hillary-has-some-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-201989</link>
		<dc:creator>PCD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 18:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3477#comment-201989</guid>
		<description>16, Z, you did a shiloh to my 15.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>16, Z, you did a shiloh to my 15.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zelda</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/26/hillary-has-some-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-201979</link>
		<dc:creator>Zelda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 18:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3477#comment-201979</guid>
		<description>The hearings have a lot to do with Miers&#039;s qualifications to be a Supreme Court Justice. If she can&#039;t convince the Judiciary Committee and 50 Senators to vote for her, then she is gone. She wouldn&#039;t be the first nominee to fall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hearings have a lot to do with Miers&#8217;s qualifications to be a Supreme Court Justice. If she can&#8217;t convince the Judiciary Committee and 50 Senators to vote for her, then she is gone. She wouldn&#8217;t be the first nominee to fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PCD</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/26/hillary-has-some-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-201945</link>
		<dc:creator>PCD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 17:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3477#comment-201945</guid>
		<description>14, what does that have to do with Miers&#039; qualifications to be a Supreme Court Justice???

A SCJ is to be interpreting the law as it applies to the case before the SC, not making up law, not following law not legislated by the US Congress, and DEFINITELY NOT ACTING ON WHAT THE SCJ PERSONALLY AGREES WITH OR NOT ABOUT THE PRESIDENT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>14, what does that have to do with Miers&#8217; qualifications to be a Supreme Court Justice???</p>
<p>A SCJ is to be interpreting the law as it applies to the case before the SC, not making up law, not following law not legislated by the US Congress, and DEFINITELY NOT ACTING ON WHAT THE SCJ PERSONALLY AGREES WITH OR NOT ABOUT THE PRESIDENT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zelda</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/26/hillary-has-some-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-201939</link>
		<dc:creator>Zelda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 17:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3477#comment-201939</guid>
		<description>6. That would be a start. The hearings should be interesting and informative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>6. That would be a start. The hearings should be interesting and informative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peejz</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/26/hillary-has-some-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-201908</link>
		<dc:creator>Peejz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3477#comment-201908</guid>
		<description>Well, there were some surpluses due to Gingrich and Co controlling the spending. But the surpluses came from SS(using those funds rather than borrowing) and from taxing the people at such a high rate that in 1999, we started to see the levy breaking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, there were some surpluses due to Gingrich and Co controlling the spending. But the surpluses came from SS(using those funds rather than borrowing) and from taxing the people at such a high rate that in 1999, we started to see the levy breaking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Kilo</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/26/hillary-has-some-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-201900</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Kilo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3477#comment-201900</guid>
		<description>Peejz...please, please do not fall for that Clinton &quot;surplus&quot; propaganda.... THERE NEVER WAS A SURPLUS.

They moved money around from the SS trust fund, and cooked the books, and everyone knows it.

don&#039;t believe anything that ooozes from that carpet-bagging bitche&#039;s mouth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peejz&#8230;please, please do not fall for that Clinton &#8220;surplus&#8221; propaganda&#8230;. THERE NEVER WAS A SURPLUS.</p>
<p>They moved money around from the SS trust fund, and cooked the books, and everyone knows it.</p>
<p>don&#8217;t believe anything that ooozes from that carpet-bagging bitche&#8217;s mouth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peejz</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/26/hillary-has-some-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-201889</link>
		<dc:creator>Peejz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3477#comment-201889</guid>
		<description>10- Robert good points.  She forgets that because of that surplus he built up, we had companies fleeing our shores, Heintz comes to mind. We taxed companies off our shores. We taxed people out of discretionary spending money. We taxed people out of jobs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10- Robert good points.  She forgets that because of that surplus he built up, we had companies fleeing our shores, Heintz comes to mind. We taxed companies off our shores. We taxed people out of discretionary spending money. We taxed people out of jobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/10/26/hillary-has-some-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-201885</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 15:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3477#comment-201885</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Clinton was equally outspoken on the economy. She told several thousand spectators that her husband, former President Bill Clinton, was able to balance the budget while at the same time creating 22 million jobs. But she said that fiscal responsibility has been lost of late.&lt;/em&gt;

Bush has been fiscally irresponsible with the prescription drug boondoggle. But I have to laugh every time somebody talks about how Klinton&#039;s wonderful economy and peace &quot;dividend&quot;.

Bush has the misfortune of being the President stuck with the mess Klninton left. The Klinton economy was a bubble, fueled by speculation and the internet tech revolution. Don&#039;t forget that Klinton also inherited a rising economy from Bush I, fueled by cheap, abundant oil. Klinton did NOTHING to keep that oil supply cheap and available, mostly ignored the growing terrorist threat, and instead went to war in Kosovo where we had NO U.S. interests and were not attacked or threatened in any way (and to help the Muslims to boot!).

Klinton left a falling economy, an impending terrorism crisis that exploded on 9/11, and the perception amongst our enemies that America was a degenerate paper tiger ripe for attack.

I don&#039;t care one bit about his philandering, and I think looking back now maybe it was a mistake to constantly attack Klinton over that because perhaps it distracted him from managing things like the terrorism threat. 

But when Bush came into office it was like the aftermath of a huge party. The food and drink were gone, the good times were over, and all that was left was the cleanup and to pay the bill. That is what we are doing now.

Hillary and others should shut their yaps about Klinton&#039;s &quot;legacy&quot;, because it is a sorrowful, shameful display of malfeasance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Clinton was equally outspoken on the economy. She told several thousand spectators that her husband, former President Bill Clinton, was able to balance the budget while at the same time creating 22 million jobs. But she said that fiscal responsibility has been lost of late.</em></p>
<p>Bush has been fiscally irresponsible with the prescription drug boondoggle. But I have to laugh every time somebody talks about how Klinton&#8217;s wonderful economy and peace &#8220;dividend&#8221;.</p>
<p>Bush has the misfortune of being the President stuck with the mess Klninton left. The Klinton economy was a bubble, fueled by speculation and the internet tech revolution. Don&#8217;t forget that Klinton also inherited a rising economy from Bush I, fueled by cheap, abundant oil. Klinton did NOTHING to keep that oil supply cheap and available, mostly ignored the growing terrorist threat, and instead went to war in Kosovo where we had NO U.S. interests and were not attacked or threatened in any way (and to help the Muslims to boot!).</p>
<p>Klinton left a falling economy, an impending terrorism crisis that exploded on 9/11, and the perception amongst our enemies that America was a degenerate paper tiger ripe for attack.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care one bit about his philandering, and I think looking back now maybe it was a mistake to constantly attack Klinton over that because perhaps it distracted him from managing things like the terrorism threat. </p>
<p>But when Bush came into office it was like the aftermath of a huge party. The food and drink were gone, the good times were over, and all that was left was the cleanup and to pay the bill. That is what we are doing now.</p>
<p>Hillary and others should shut their yaps about Klinton&#8217;s &#8220;legacy&#8221;, because it is a sorrowful, shameful display of malfeasance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

