<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Murtha Face Ethics Probe?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightvoices.com/2005/11/20/should-murtha-face-ethics-probe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/11/20/should-murtha-face-ethics-probe/</link>
	<description>in all matter of opinion, our adversaries are insane.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:01:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MattGar</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/11/20/should-murtha-face-ethics-probe/comment-page-1/#comment-478743</link>
		<dc:creator>MattGar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 09:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3571#comment-478743</guid>
		<description>You shouldn&#039;t do this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You shouldn&#8217;t do this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peejz</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/11/20/should-murtha-face-ethics-probe/comment-page-1/#comment-235422</link>
		<dc:creator>Peejz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 22:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3571#comment-235422</guid>
		<description>He put them in another persons name to prevent this very thing..I think he should now turn around and sign a major advertising deal with the makers and that would be poetic justice!  BTW, this is not an uncommon practice among famous people..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He put them in another persons name to prevent this very thing..I think he should now turn around and sign a major advertising deal with the makers and that would be poetic justice!  BTW, this is not an uncommon practice among famous people..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: san francisco liberal</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/11/20/should-murtha-face-ethics-probe/comment-page-1/#comment-235399</link>
		<dc:creator>san francisco liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 22:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3571#comment-235399</guid>
		<description>OK, I can accept that explanation for now while we wait and see what the official report will say and what the AG office in FL will do about this.  

Or maybe we should just wait until he gets busted again with prescription pills that aren&#039;t prescribed in his name - again.

I don&#039;t think we&#039;ll have to wait long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I can accept that explanation for now while we wait and see what the official report will say and what the AG office in FL will do about this.  </p>
<p>Or maybe we should just wait until he gets busted again with prescription pills that aren&#8217;t prescribed in his name &#8211; again.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;ll have to wait long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peejz</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/11/20/should-murtha-face-ethics-probe/comment-page-1/#comment-235383</link>
		<dc:creator>Peejz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 22:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3571#comment-235383</guid>
		<description>It is not a crime under Florida statutes as long as the 3rd party is aware of it. Viagra is not a class 2 drug(controlled narcotic such as oxy contin) therefore he did not violate his agreement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not a crime under Florida statutes as long as the 3rd party is aware of it. Viagra is not a class 2 drug(controlled narcotic such as oxy contin) therefore he did not violate his agreement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: san francisco liberal</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/11/20/should-murtha-face-ethics-probe/comment-page-1/#comment-235329</link>
		<dc:creator>san francisco liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 21:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3571#comment-235329</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;It is a crime if the man get&#039;s caught with prescriptions in another persons name!! &lt;/strong&gt; 

AND, it&#039;s a possible violation of his plea agreement.  He was supposed to stay out of trouble for 18 months...he could even make it three without getting busted again.

The Far-Rights boot-licking and servile attitude towards Rush is unbecoming.  It&#039;s only because you are afraid of losing face for supporting him that you won&#039;t admit your error of support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>It is a crime if the man get&#8217;s caught with prescriptions in another persons name!! </strong> </p>
<p>AND, it&#8217;s a possible violation of his plea agreement.  He was supposed to stay out of trouble for 18 months&#8230;he could even make it three without getting busted again.</p>
<p>The Far-Rights boot-licking and servile attitude towards Rush is unbecoming.  It&#8217;s only because you are afraid of losing face for supporting him that you won&#8217;t admit your error of support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peejz</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/11/20/should-murtha-face-ethics-probe/comment-page-1/#comment-235291</link>
		<dc:creator>Peejz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 20:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3571#comment-235291</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Actually Peejz, it is &quot;possible that he committed a second-degree misdemeanor violationâ€.

The sheriff&#039;s office plans to file a report with the state attorney&#039;s office and there might be an investigation.

You Apologists are AMAZING. The man gets caught AGAIN with drugs and you STILL can&#039;t accept that he is a hypocrite and not to be trusted or respected.&lt;/em&gt;

Actually it is not a crime and I believe the officer followed procedure by filing the report..no law broken..the man is allowed Viagra, just as you and any other man is..there is no shame in it and there is no crime for his possession of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Actually Peejz, it is &#8220;possible that he committed a second-degree misdemeanor violationâ€.</p>
<p>The sheriff&#8217;s office plans to file a report with the state attorney&#8217;s office and there might be an investigation.</p>
<p>You Apologists are AMAZING. The man gets caught AGAIN with drugs and you STILL can&#8217;t accept that he is a hypocrite and not to be trusted or respected.</em></p>
<p>Actually it is not a crime and I believe the officer followed procedure by filing the report..no law broken..the man is allowed Viagra, just as you and any other man is..there is no shame in it and there is no crime for his possession of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: san francisco liberal</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/11/20/should-murtha-face-ethics-probe/comment-page-1/#comment-235279</link>
		<dc:creator>san francisco liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 20:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3571#comment-235279</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&quot;They lost big already with the Limbaugh case, but every time they think there&#039;s a glimmer of light for them, they jump like trained monkeys.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;


Sounds familier...

They lost big already with the &lt;strong&gt;MISSING VAST WMD STOCKPILES&lt;/strong&gt;, but every time they think there&#039;s a glimmer of light for them, they jump like trained monkeys.

jump monkey, jump!  I think I saw a rusty, ineffective, 25 year old shell over there!  Go get it boy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;They lost big already with the Limbaugh case, but every time they think there&#8217;s a glimmer of light for them, they jump like trained monkeys.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Sounds familier&#8230;</p>
<p>They lost big already with the <strong>MISSING VAST WMD STOCKPILES</strong>, but every time they think there&#8217;s a glimmer of light for them, they jump like trained monkeys.</p>
<p>jump monkey, jump!  I think I saw a rusty, ineffective, 25 year old shell over there!  Go get it boy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: san francisco liberal</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/11/20/should-murtha-face-ethics-probe/comment-page-1/#comment-235274</link>
		<dc:creator>san francisco liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 20:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3571#comment-235274</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&quot;Face it: You didn&#039;t get Limbaugh, Lefties.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;


Robert, we already got him. (!)

He&#039;s been already exposed as a hypocrite, and him getting caught &lt;strong&gt;AGAIN &lt;/strong&gt;just puts the icing on the cake for us.

Pathetic attempts at saving face by you guys.  My advice? It&#039;s ok to have your heros fall once in awhile.  It doens&#039;t reflect TOO POORLY on you.  HAHA...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;Face it: You didn&#8217;t get Limbaugh, Lefties.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Robert, we already got him. (!)</p>
<p>He&#8217;s been already exposed as a hypocrite, and him getting caught <strong>AGAIN </strong>just puts the icing on the cake for us.</p>
<p>Pathetic attempts at saving face by you guys.  My advice? It&#8217;s ok to have your heros fall once in awhile.  It doens&#8217;t reflect TOO POORLY on you.  HAHA&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: san francisco liberal</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/11/20/should-murtha-face-ethics-probe/comment-page-1/#comment-235271</link>
		<dc:creator>san francisco liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 20:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3571#comment-235271</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&quot;Actually Alyssa..it isn&#039;t an infraction of his plea..he can not have perscriptions for or have traces of specific painkillers..that&#039;s it..noting more..this is an issue to embarass him..it didn&#039;t work because he was the one laughing the loudest...&quot;&lt;/em&gt;


Actually Peejz, it is &lt;strong&gt;&quot;possible that he committed a second-degree misdemeanor violation&quot;.&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;The sheriff&#039;s office plans to file a report with the state attorney&#039;s office and there might be an investigation.&lt;/strong&gt;

You Apologists are &lt;strong&gt;AMAZING&lt;/strong&gt;.  The man gets caught &lt;strong&gt;AGAIN &lt;/strong&gt;with drugs and you STILL can&#039;t accept that he is a hypocrite and not to be trusted or respected.

Deep down, I bet you guys really do think he&#039;s a P.O.S but you just can&#039;t and won&#039;t admit it to yourselves and especially to liberals for fear of having them NAIL YOU ON IT.

LOL...the man is laughing you say?  I think we on the left are laughing a little bit harder on this. 

you apologists are hypocrites.  FYI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;Actually Alyssa..it isn&#8217;t an infraction of his plea..he can not have perscriptions for or have traces of specific painkillers..that&#8217;s it..noting more..this is an issue to embarass him..it didn&#8217;t work because he was the one laughing the loudest&#8230;&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Actually Peejz, it is <strong>&#8220;possible that he committed a second-degree misdemeanor violation&#8221;.</strong></p>
<p><strong>The sheriff&#8217;s office plans to file a report with the state attorney&#8217;s office and there might be an investigation.</strong></p>
<p>You Apologists are <strong>AMAZING</strong>.  The man gets caught <strong>AGAIN </strong>with drugs and you STILL can&#8217;t accept that he is a hypocrite and not to be trusted or respected.</p>
<p>Deep down, I bet you guys really do think he&#8217;s a P.O.S but you just can&#8217;t and won&#8217;t admit it to yourselves and especially to liberals for fear of having them NAIL YOU ON IT.</p>
<p>LOL&#8230;the man is laughing you say?  I think we on the left are laughing a little bit harder on this. </p>
<p>you apologists are hypocrites.  FYI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2005/11/20/should-murtha-face-ethics-probe/comment-page-1/#comment-235179</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 19:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/?p=3571#comment-235179</guid>
		<description>The Left just can&#039;t let this go. They lost big already with the Limbaugh case, but every time they think there&#039;s a glimmer of light for them, they jump like trained monkeys.

Face it: You didn&#039;t &lt;em&gt;get&lt;/em&gt; Limbaugh, Lefties. And you aren&#039;t going to this time either. You&#039;re just giving him more publicity and increasing his listener base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Left just can&#8217;t let this go. They lost big already with the Limbaugh case, but every time they think there&#8217;s a glimmer of light for them, they jump like trained monkeys.</p>
<p>Face it: You didn&#8217;t <em>get</em> Limbaugh, Lefties. And you aren&#8217;t going to this time either. You&#8217;re just giving him more publicity and increasing his listener base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
