http://rightvoices.com/2006/01/08/the-docex-project/ in all matter of opinion, our adversaries are insane. Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:38:44 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 http://rightvoices.com/2006/01/08/the-docex-project/comment-page-1/#comment-737643 Mark E Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:48:41 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/?p=3681#comment-737643 This story is going to resurface...I have been digging deeper on it. This story is going to resurface…I have been digging deeper on it.

]]> http://rightvoices.com/2006/01/08/the-docex-project/comment-page-1/#comment-213126 Mike Kilo Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:23:25 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/?p=3681#comment-213126 As they did in Oklahoma City..... As they did in Oklahoma City…..

]]> http://rightvoices.com/2006/01/08/the-docex-project/comment-page-1/#comment-213125 Mike Kilo Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:23:05 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/?p=3681#comment-213125 As they did in Oklahoman City..... As they did in Oklahoman City…..

]]> http://rightvoices.com/2006/01/08/the-docex-project/comment-page-1/#comment-213097 FrmrArtyOffcr Mon, 09 Jan 2006 06:52:07 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/?p=3681#comment-213097 For anyone to believe that because Saddam was a secularist he wouldn't support radical Islamic terrorists is just plain foolish. While he might not agree with them, they would have common enemies - THE US and Israel. It's been a simple stratagem of warfare for centuries that the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Radical Islamists gave Saddam something he might not have had otherwise - a way to attack the west without any possibility of retaliation. It's called plausible deniability. Every government hires outside agents to do things that actual government employees can not do in order to prevent the action from being traced back to the government. The difference here is that instead of paying them in briefcases filled with unmarked bills or wire transfers to numbered Swiss accounts, Saddam could get them to act unwittingly in his behalf for solely ideological reasons. For anyone to believe that because Saddam was a secularist he wouldn’t support radical Islamic terrorists is just plain foolish. While he might not agree with them, they would have common enemies – THE US and Israel. It’s been a simple stratagem of warfare for centuries that the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Radical Islamists gave Saddam something he might not have had otherwise – a way to attack the west without any possibility of retaliation. It’s called plausible deniability. Every government hires outside agents to do things that actual government employees can not do in order to prevent the action from being traced back to the government. The difference here is that instead of paying them in briefcases filled with unmarked bills or wire transfers to numbered Swiss accounts, Saddam could get them to act unwittingly in his behalf for solely ideological reasons.

]]>