<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia, Can You Trust The Info?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightvoices.com/2006/02/09/wikipedia-can-you-trust-the-info/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightvoices.com/2006/02/09/wikipedia-can-you-trust-the-info/</link>
	<description>in all matter of opinion, our adversaries are insane.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 14:43:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sasha</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2006/02/09/wikipedia-can-you-trust-the-info/comment-page-1/#comment-217048</link>
		<dc:creator>Sasha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2006 04:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2006/02/09/wikipedia-can-you-trust-the-info/#comment-217048</guid>
		<description>Thanks, PCD. Got your message from Monday that was all about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, PCD. Got your message from Monday that was all about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sasha</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2006/02/09/wikipedia-can-you-trust-the-info/comment-page-1/#comment-216991</link>
		<dc:creator>Sasha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2006/02/09/wikipedia-can-you-trust-the-info/#comment-216991</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve corrected information there. It&#039;s a good idea, but there is no real way to make sure only good and accuarate is made available to the public.

I wouldn&#039;t make any bets based on information found at wikipedia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve corrected information there. It&#8217;s a good idea, but there is no real way to make sure only good and accuarate is made available to the public.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t make any bets based on information found at wikipedia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peejz</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2006/02/09/wikipedia-can-you-trust-the-info/comment-page-1/#comment-216979</link>
		<dc:creator>Peejz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2006/02/09/wikipedia-can-you-trust-the-info/#comment-216979</guid>
		<description>I posted changes from both sides of the aisle.  Hence the Conrad Burns info...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted changes from both sides of the aisle.  Hence the Conrad Burns info&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PCD</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2006/02/09/wikipedia-can-you-trust-the-info/comment-page-1/#comment-216978</link>
		<dc:creator>PCD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2006/02/09/wikipedia-can-you-trust-the-info/#comment-216978</guid>
		<description>I blogged over at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iowavoice.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Iowa Voice, Pg 2&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; about Wikipedia waking up to politicians and their staffs editing entries and having banned them from doing so in this article from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scotsman.com/?id=184102006&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;the Scotsman&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I blogged over at <a href="http://www.iowavoice.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>Iowa Voice, Pg 2</strong></a> about Wikipedia waking up to politicians and their staffs editing entries and having banned them from doing so in this article from <a href="http://www.scotsman.com/?id=184102006" rel="nofollow"><strong>the Scotsman</strong></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2006/02/09/wikipedia-can-you-trust-the-info/comment-page-1/#comment-216967</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2006/02/09/wikipedia-can-you-trust-the-info/#comment-216967</guid>
		<description>The article also stated the following.  Be fair, now.  Also, anyone can post on Wikipedia, so the prevalence of false/misleading info could be high especially if motivated by political goals ... from either side of the aisle.

&lt;blockquote&gt;The office of Sen. Norm Coleman, R-Minn., changed a description of the Minnesota Republican&#039;s political leanings as a college student from &quot;liberal Democrat&quot; to &quot;activist Democrat&quot; and then to &quot;active college student,&quot; the Wikipedia investigation found.

The investigation found that references to Coleman&#039;s 98 percent pro-Bush voting record were removed, along with references to White House deputy chief of staff Karl Rove. &lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article also stated the following.  Be fair, now.  Also, anyone can post on Wikipedia, so the prevalence of false/misleading info could be high especially if motivated by political goals &#8230; from either side of the aisle.</p>
<blockquote><p>The office of Sen. Norm Coleman, R-Minn., changed a description of the Minnesota Republican&#8217;s political leanings as a college student from &#8220;liberal Democrat&#8221; to &#8220;activist Democrat&#8221; and then to &#8220;active college student,&#8221; the Wikipedia investigation found.</p>
<p>The investigation found that references to Coleman&#8217;s 98 percent pro-Bush voting record were removed, along with references to White House deputy chief of staff Karl Rove. </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2006/02/09/wikipedia-can-you-trust-the-info/comment-page-1/#comment-216919</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 04:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2006/02/09/wikipedia-can-you-trust-the-info/#comment-216919</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it quite remarkable that these highly educated people, professionals, wealthy, leaders in politics, can skillfully manipulate and maneuver politically to the nth degree. 

But somehow, in certain instances, they are suddenly incapable. They don&#039;t know anything about it, can&#039;t recall anything, never looked into it, didn&#039;t realize it, yada yada yada.

DiFi is the just the latest example of politico lying and hypocrisy. The Klintons were masters at denial, obstruction, and obfuscation.

Like the subpoenaed Rose Law firm billing records. Lost, until well after the reason for their being subpoenaed went away. Then, shazam! Why, we never thought to look behind that door! There&#039;s the box! Who&#039;d have thunk?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it quite remarkable that these highly educated people, professionals, wealthy, leaders in politics, can skillfully manipulate and maneuver politically to the nth degree. </p>
<p>But somehow, in certain instances, they are suddenly incapable. They don&#8217;t know anything about it, can&#8217;t recall anything, never looked into it, didn&#8217;t realize it, yada yada yada.</p>
<p>DiFi is the just the latest example of politico lying and hypocrisy. The Klintons were masters at denial, obstruction, and obfuscation.</p>
<p>Like the subpoenaed Rose Law firm billing records. Lost, until well after the reason for their being subpoenaed went away. Then, shazam! Why, we never thought to look behind that door! There&#8217;s the box! Who&#8217;d have thunk?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

