Racist Math Via Bellevue (WA) Community College
Michelle Malkin was forwarded this math problem by Rev. Wayne Perryman of Mercer Island, WA, that appeared on an exam at Bellevue (WA) Community College.
Dear Friends: The following sample math problem was given to students as part of their final exam at Bellevue Community College in Washington State. I was asked by black students to represent them in this matter. Some of these students attend my church. I am asking all of you and your friends to e-mail the school at the following e-mail addresses and express your outrage: Advising@bcc.ctc.edu, tpritcha@bcc.ctc.edu, and amatsumo@bcc.ctc.edu. The following is the math problem given to the students.
Condoleezza holds a watermelon just over the edge of the roof of the 300 -foot Federal Building, and tosses it up with a velocity of 20 feet per second. The height of the watermelon above the ground t seconds later is given by formula h= -16t2 + 20t + 300a. How many seconds will it pass her (she’s standing at a height of 300 feet) on the way down?
b. When will the watermelon hit ground?
If they used this same problem and substituted Condoleezza’s name with Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton, there would be mass protest and they would shut the college down. Because it was Condoleezza Rice, they wanted to ignore it until I showed up today. Please e-mail the college and express your outrage and your support of having me at the table to resolve this issue. I am demanding that the college to do several things to correct the problem.
This is serious. Please do not let me down, I want thousands of e-mails to come from all across the country. A CBS affiliate, KIRO TV did cover this story.
Rev. Wayne Perryman
And let me guess what the justification is..she isn’t black enough?
Selective support for racial discrimination is killing the civil rights movement.
According to MLK, it shouldn’t matter what political party Dr. Rice is affiliated with..she is a self made woman, just like Oprah, who has achieved greatness on her own. She should be held us as an example of what can be with hard work,dedication and perseverance, not as the butt of a watermelon joke!

April 12, 2006 - 07:04 AM on April 12th, 2006
(I’ll ignore Secretary Rice’s height for the sake of this question. Also I prefer to use the actual value for gravity instead of rounding it as shown above)
a. 1.24 seconds
b. 4.98 seconds
c. There is no 300 foot tall federal building in Washington D.C.?
April 12, 2006 - 07:11 AM on April 12th, 2006
Why don’t liberals just get their racism out in the open and start referring to her as “Nigger Rice”
I’m waiting.
April 12, 2006 - 08:32 AM on April 12th, 2006
New Math was a big mistake we should just return to the 3 Rs and thats not Reduce,Reuse,Recycle:razz:
April 12, 2006 - 08:47 AM on April 12th, 2006
Unbelievable! The double standards, hypocrisy and RACISM of the Left has reached epic proportions.
Liberals/Socialists/Democrites = the Liberal Klux Klan
And re HilLiary’s pandering speech about illegals: No HilLiary, they don’t clean “our” toilets, take care of “our” kids, and empty “our” Trash. Most Americans don’t live in an elitist bubble like you do, HilLiary. I take care of my own kids, clean my own toilets, empty my own trash and I suspect most working Americans do. And if I did pay someone else to do it, I wouldn’t try to import an economic slave class to do my dirty work for less than a living wage like you want to, HilLiary.
The arrogance, elitism, selfishness, greed, and racism of the Liberal Klux Klan is beyond anything I have ever seen.
April 12, 2006 - 08:52 AM on April 12th, 2006
I know, have you ever heard such arrogant, racist condescention in your life?
What a bigot pig.
The klan couldn’t even dream of insulting minorities the way liberals do on a daily basis.
It’s sick.
April 12, 2006 - 09:39 AM on April 12th, 2006
“And if I did pay someone else to do it, I wouldn’t try to import an economic slave class to do my dirty work for less than a living wage like you want to, HilLiary.â€
How is that really any different than paying people in China about the same to make all the stuff we buy in America?
April 12, 2006 - 09:45 AM on April 12th, 2006
because the slave in china isn’t coming here, demanding health care and education, forming gangs, raping, marauding, killing, then marching for “full citizenship”
April 12, 2006 - 09:49 AM on April 12th, 2006
So it’s okay to use this “slave labor”as long as the slaves aren’t actually in America?
April 12, 2006 - 09:49 AM on April 12th, 2006
6- Zelda there are 2 points to be made about your statement:
1. Those supporting illegal immigration are the very same people that are bitching about our jobs etc going to places like China…
2. Robert makes a good point, most of America does not depend on an illegal immigrants to clean their house or raise their children. Most of America does not depend on illegal immigrants to cut their lawns..(hell, they wouldn’t even get into my area.) The very people that are claiming we can’t do without them as domestic help (Hillary and Erica Jong) are the very people that can well afford to hire American citizens to do their work!
April 12, 2006 - 09:51 AM on April 12th, 2006
Peejz;
1. That’s good. That link hadn’t occurred to me but you’re absolutely right.
April 12, 2006 - 11:50 AM on April 12th, 2006
If that’s true, then why do minorities OVERWHELMINGLY vote for Democrats?
In 2004, Bush got 11% of the voting black population.
ELEVEN PERCENT.
try again, guys…
April 12, 2006 - 11:55 AM on April 12th, 2006
Yes, I am saying that liberals are EXTREMELY racist.
Liberals LOVE racism…if not for racism, you wouldn’t be able to keep those minorities on the Democratic plantation…
Like shelby steele said, “If there is some racism somewhere, black leaders and white liberals would light themselves on fire to get there..they LOVE racism”
it’s so true.
April 12, 2006 - 12:00 PM on April 12th, 2006
“If that’s true, then why do minorities OVERWHELMINGLY vote for Democrats?â€
Because minorities are overwhelmingly racist.
April 12, 2006 - 12:08 PM on April 12th, 2006
Guys, say what you want; stomp your feet, gnash your teeth and tear at your clothes…
…but that won’t win you any minority votes.
Do conservatives and Republicans want to win minority voters? Then maybe create some policies that attracts them, NOT REPULSES THEM.
Until then, stop whining and maybe try to make some progress with your fellow Americans.
Telling them that they are racist isn’t a good way to go about making friends in their communities…
April 12, 2006 - 12:13 PM on April 12th, 2006
let’s see how Democrats treat minorities
use welfare to drive out fathers, creating single parent homes
Chain inner city children in baby-sitting gulags known as “public schools” and don’t let them out
Pay “voters” in kools and malt liquor and drive them to the polls to vote democrat
excuse the criminal behaviour of people like Cynthia McKinney, because you don’t expect any better of them.
that about sums up the general idea of how democrats treat minorities….
racists.
April 12, 2006 - 12:14 PM on April 12th, 2006
Where did you get that this conversation is about Republicans wanting to win minority votes?
You’ve made 2 comments on this thread and have yet to admonish the professor. That silent bigotry is getting louder San Fran!
April 12, 2006 - 12:39 PM on April 12th, 2006
“Telling them that they are racist isn’t a good way to go about making friends in their communities”
Who said we were trying to make friends? I was trying to be honest.
I guess the Democrat method is to give minorities whatever the minorities think they want. Basically to buy their votes with taxpayer money.
April 12, 2006 - 12:41 PM on April 12th, 2006
RE: Peejz
“Where did you get that this conversation is about Republicans wanting to win minority votes?”
Hey now, I’m just saying you attract more flies with honey than vinegar. Just something for some on your side to think about…
You’ve made 2 comments on this thread and have yet to admonish the professor.
#1. I’m not 100% sure this is real. I can’t find any links on it from KIRO TV in WA., and this “Rev. Wayne Perryman” has written books on blacks for the GOP…seems like an internet urban legend rumor thing. Please do prove me wrong on that. I would LOVE to see an actual real news link (not NewsMax)…
#2. Without being in the classroom, it is hard to find the context this is being said in. Were there OTHER math problems with celebrities names involved in strange situations?
#3. I just don’t find the watermelon reference offensive.
Peejz, Anything your team can do to distract or deflect Republicans DISMAL record on race relations is a feather in your cap…
Please. This is just another in a long line of weak attempts to make Dems look bad and Repubs look good on race relations.
April 12, 2006 - 12:48 PM on April 12th, 2006
“I guess the Democrat method is to give minorities whatever the minorities think they want. Basically to buy their votes with taxpayer money.”
Uhhhh….what world do you live in?
This is America, and here in America politicians in BOTH PARTIES, for hundreds of years, have tried to influence one group or another for votes.
That’s how it is, how it has been, and how it’ll probably always be.
Don’t try to tell me Republicans don’t do the SAME EXACT THING with Big Business and their votes…
April 12, 2006 - 12:58 PM on April 12th, 2006
“Don’t try to tell me Republicans don’t do the SAME EXACT THING with Big Business and their votes”
I don’t deny it at all.
April 12, 2006 - 01:24 PM on April 12th, 2006
Fom San Fran-#3. I just don’t find the watermelon reference offensive.
Racists usually don’t!
April 12, 2006 - 01:29 PM on April 12th, 2006
SAn Fran, what is the democrats record on race relations…let’s see.
1. opposed emancipation..
2. opposed civil rights act
3. oppose school choice
4. have a KKK Kleagle as a senior senator
5. hurl racial epithets at Colin Powell, Condi Rice, Michael Steele, etc.
6. absolve Cynthia Mckinney of any culpability
nice record..I’d really be trumpeting that.
April 12, 2006 - 02:58 PM on April 12th, 2006
What do you expect from a state where residents jeer at the military during a parade and a Senator praises Osama bin Laden?
April 12, 2006 - 03:01 PM on April 12th, 2006
Mike Kilo…
How many blacks voted for Bush last election?
11%.
Your team can talk smack all you want about Democrats and race relations with minorities, but it won’t mean a thing until you get some real numbers to back up what you’re saying.
Until then, you guys don’t have a leg to stand on regarding African Americans. (!)
April 12, 2006 - 03:18 PM on April 12th, 2006
How silly to think that by getting their vote you can equate that with progress. But I guess I shouldn’t expect the master of the plantation to recognize that.
April 12, 2006 - 04:49 PM on April 12th, 2006
In response to post 24: More blacks and Jews voted Republican in 2004 than in 2000. Also, there are a number African-American men pursuing political office, including Lynn Swann, Michael Steele, and Ken Blackwell.
April 12, 2006 - 09:06 PM on April 12th, 2006
San Fran Liberal: “You’re saying the Democratic Party and liberals in general are racist?
If that’s true, then why do minorities OVERWHELMINGLY vote for Democrats?”
‘Cause dey be on da plantation. know what I’m sayin’?
Liberals/Socialists/Democrites = Liberal Klux Klan. Take that to the bank!
And that fact that you don’t find the watermelon remark offensive is amazing and appalling.
April 12, 2006 - 11:15 PM on April 12th, 2006
Obviously some racist asswipe god-fearing repug conservative is responsible for this, so why are you blaming Liberals? Because all of you so-called conservatives are pathologically dishonest and hate all that is good in this world, including America and our troops
April 13, 2006 - 02:04 AM on April 13th, 2006
Re 28: Go back and look at the topic. It is a pos Leftist teacher that came up with it. Duh…
April 13, 2006 - 02:44 AM on April 13th, 2006
This is so funny!!!
Because of a math problem, all Democrats are said to be racist? LMAO
So, if Bush had been chosen as the lucky watermelon thrower, that would be anti-white racism? There is nothing offensive about trowing watermelons. At least I don’t see anything offensive in it. It’s not like the math problem was about Condo doing anything perverse…
EDITED BY PEEJZ FOR NOT FOLLOWING LINKING PROCEDUREI don’t see how Condo’s race was ever mentioned in the math problem…
April 13, 2006 - 06:03 AM on April 13th, 2006
30-Of course you don’t see it, you are French! In this country, there are racist undertones when associating the blacks with, among many other things, fried chicken, picking cotton, and watermelons.
April 13, 2006 - 06:26 AM on April 13th, 2006
ah sorry, I did not know about these (I could guess the link with picking cotton, but not with watermelons nor with fried chicken)…
Sorry also about posting a link (as a reference to a definition). I did not know about that…
April 13, 2006 - 06:54 AM on April 13th, 2006
San Fran..what are you trying to prove? We know that most blacks are on the democrat plantation… that dosen’t prove they are racist..HOW THEY GOT THERE is what makes democrats racist.
they hand out just enough to keep them voting for them, and NO MORE!!!
April 13, 2006 - 06:57 AM on April 13th, 2006
but don’t worry, as the black middle class grows (and grows more conservative), this lie will eventually be exposed.
Survey after survey shows that blacks in america are:
1. more religious
2. against gay marriage
3. pro life
4. for school choice
So the question begs…why the fuck would they then vote for a party that is AGAINST religion, FOR gay marriage, FOR dismembering babies and AGAINST school choice?
because they’ve been hoodwinked, bamboozled…. but, never fear, the truth shall set you free.
April 13, 2006 - 07:07 AM on April 13th, 2006
Nikele- No problem. And had the equation been used with George Bush’s name substituted for Condi Rice’s..it would not have been a racial slur…Our point is, all hell would have broke loose had the name King, Sharpton or Jackson been used rather than Condi’s…but because Condi is a Republican and the alleged civil rights leaders in this country will do nothing to come to her defense..
April 13, 2006 - 08:29 AM on April 13th, 2006
The liberals are racsists themselves i mean just look at all the nasty things they said about CLARENCE THOMAS
April 13, 2006 - 08:38 AM on April 13th, 2006
Of course.. everyone knows that liberals are basically racist bigots…they look at minorites as stupid, incapable of taking care of themselves without THEM.
it’s really ridiculous.
April 13, 2006 - 08:43 AM on April 13th, 2006
Re 29. No, a Liberal would never make such a racial slur. It is not in their personality to do it. The story is either completely false (typical conservative dishonesty), or the professor is a conservative. Only conservatives can be racists. It has always been that way. A racist Liberal is an oxymoron. I know that many of you conservatives are not that bright, and will dishonestly try to associate Democrats from a previous generation with Liberals. Those racists have nearly all became republicans, where they are welcome. Republicans at one time were social Liberals; they have now become Democrats, where they are welcome.
April 13, 2006 - 08:43 AM on April 13th, 2006
This fundamental racism of the Liberals/Socialists/Democrites (the Liberal Klux Klan) is so easily discerned by an examination of the effects of their words and deeds, and matching up reality against their rhetoric.
Yet the sheeple haven’t figured it out yet, and the minorities still firmly on the plantation show little evidence of wanting to figure it out.
The support for affirmative action is a reliable litmus test for a racist.
Liberal who supports affirmative action = racist.
April 13, 2006 - 08:47 AM on April 13th, 2006
Re: 38 (Robert) is a perfect example of a small-penis panty-waist closeted self-hating homosexual god-fearing republican conservative.
April 13, 2006 - 08:59 AM on April 13th, 2006
40.. there it is everyone.. the typical, hateful bigotry of the modern day liberal.
Dylan, you have no ability to discern what it is that we are saying, do you?
What is racism? A belief that one race is superior to another.. would that be a good definition?
Well, let’s how liberals typically treat miniorities. As children, incapable of taking care of themselves without handouts like welfare, affirmative action, etc.
I would say that is racism.
Conservatives, on the other hand, believe in the inherent ability of ALL people to work hard, educated themselves, take care of their family, etc. and make their dreams and goals happen. We see all people as equal, and equally able.
You have exposed yourself as the hateful bigot that you are.
April 13, 2006 - 09:02 AM on April 13th, 2006
Dyldan, you are an example of a degenerate Leftist/Socialist/Democrite member of the Liberal Klux Klan who probably hates America, hates everything traditional, probably wants Al Qaeda and the beloved “insurgents” to win, and has his head inserted so far into his rectum that even major surgery could not correct it.
Dyplan, the “teacher” in the story is a leftist pos. And it was that Leftist pos who made the racial slur. You, like many Liberals, just choose to rewrite the facts to suit your agenda, but it does not change reality.
Go back to sleep, sheeple boy. And if you can’t, then go watch “Brokeback Mountain” and “Deliverance” again, your two all-time favorite movies. You probably think “deliverance” is an instructional documentary, and is well suited for your intelligence level.
April 13, 2006 - 09:05 AM on April 13th, 2006
“you are an example of a degenerate Leftist/Socialist/Democrite member of the Liberal Klux Klan”
the word degenerate seems to qualify all Leftist/Socialist/Democrite and I think it’s close to racism (I a large way). I believe it’s nice to try to show racism in other people’s saying without being racist yourself.
April 13, 2006 - 09:46 AM on April 13th, 2006
Robert just proved that everything I guessed about him is true. Thanks for clarifying that, Robert.
I’m certain you own your own copy of Broke Back. By the way, I don’t care that you’re a homosexual – only that you’re a self-hating one and a hypocrite, not to mention a racist and America-hater who is no doubt a coward like cheney, w bush, rumsfeld, hannity, limbaugh and all the rest of them.
As for the professor being a Liberal – prove it.
god, you people are stupid. When will you lean to think for yourselves instead of obediently parroting everything hannity, coulter or someother America-hating wing-nut tells you?
Wake-up, people.
April 13, 2006 - 09:53 AM on April 13th, 2006
Hey Dyplan: GFY
April 13, 2006 - 09:55 AM on April 13th, 2006
44. Dylan, seems like you are the one with the issues, you seem to spend a lot of time discussing sexual orientation…
but then again, that’s what bigots do…
April 13, 2006 - 10:11 AM on April 13th, 2006
Again, sexual orientation is the exclusive pre-occupation of conservatives. Just read your own right-wing-nut blogs for proof
And you guys should know, since there are more closeted homosexuals in this bush administration and the upper echelons of the republican party than at any time in history. Conservatives welcome homosexuals – as long as they agree to bash other homosexuals. The same with Blacks and other minorities: you’re welcome in the conservative movement provided you bash other Blacks or minorities. In other words, if you have no principles you’re probably already a conservative.
Why are you so full of hate? Why do you hate America and our constitution? Maybe you should think of moving to another country if you hate it here so much.
Still waiting for the proof of the Liberal racist professor …. Sorry, some dishonest asswipe wing-nut’s word for it is not proof
April 13, 2006 - 10:12 AM on April 13th, 2006
Dyldan needs to find some place to troll that is commensurate with his apparently limited skills (limited to obscenity, copy/paste of someone else’s words, and hackneyed insults).
Does michaelmoore.com have a bulletin board Dyldan can infest? moveon.org? Just trying to help him out. It is good to be kind to the less capable…
April 13, 2006 - 10:20 AM on April 13th, 2006
no, we need to have the racist, bigots of the left here, to study them, see what makes them so damn ignorant.
April 13, 2006 - 10:34 AM on April 13th, 2006
Dylan makes a wonderful case study!
April 13, 2006 - 10:34 AM on April 13th, 2006
Kinda funy how he jumps in the middle of this topic and starts this whole diatribe about homosexuality. A little off-topic, I’d say. He was the only one that thought of it, that brought it up, somehow in his mind this watermelon joke racism thing triggered a spewing of homosexual-based invective that he ust felt compelled to inject into this thread.
Then he has the nerve to start accusing others of being what apparently consumes his thinking. Plus he accuses others of hating America, being against the Constitution, etc.
IMO this demonstrates that Dyldan is a Liberal/Socialist/Democrite. That is how their mentally ill brains function. They accuse others of exactly what they are/are doing. It is a pattern repeated over and over.
A Liberal’s mind is wasted…
April 13, 2006 - 10:38 AM on April 13th, 2006
we need these wackos to be out in the open..to scare the shit out of normal Americans and keep them re-electing good folks like George W. Bush, Richard Cheney, Rick Santorum, Dennis Hastert, et al!
Keep it up Dylan! We love ya!
April 13, 2006 - 12:24 PM on April 13th, 2006
What is funny and sad at the same time, is that conservatives seem completely unaware of their own hypocrisy. They are certainly guilty of most everything they accuse other’s of. It’s because conservatives cannot think for themselves, they’re brainwashed coolaid drinkers who hate America & Jesus.
. Why are you so full of hate, especially for America?
Your ship is sinking, people. Only the most thoroughly brainwashed or functionally retarded would continue to support and defend this totally corrupt republican administration and the morally bankrupt conservative movement, which is devoid of ideas or original thinking. Pathetic. Each day brings a new conservative scandal; a new revelation of lying, stealing, debauchery, defrauding the American people. You are either stupid, complicit, masochistic or all three. I hope you can understand but, if not, ask a Liberal to help you see the light
April 13, 2006 - 12:31 PM on April 13th, 2006
wow…. I can almost see the drool coming down he chin!!
April 13, 2006 - 02:49 PM on April 13th, 2006
“but because Condi is a Republican and the alleged civil rights leaders in this country will do nothing to come to her defense..”
Surely one of the most powerful women in the country does not need to be “defended” from a math problem.
It is foolish to make blanket statements accusing ALL liberals or conservatives of racism/hypocrisy/ignorance or any other trait. The fact is there are racists, hypocrites, and fools on both sides.
This whole episode warrants (at most) an apology from the teacher to the offended students.
April 13, 2006 - 04:53 PM on April 13th, 2006
justin- one would think that an apology to the students is all that is necessary, but as we have said..there will be no apology as she is a conservative..did any of the civil rights leaders come to Michael Steels defence when he was raked over the coals with racial slurs? No..it is a double standard and that double standard is setting them back.
April 13, 2006 - 06:12 PM on April 13th, 2006
[...] Racist Math Via Bellevue (WA) Community College [...]
April 13, 2006 - 10:12 PM on April 13th, 2006
Jesse Jackson holds a watermelon just over the edge of the roof of the 300 -foot Federal Building, and tosses it up with a velocity of 20 feet per second. The height of the watermelon above the ground t seconds later is given by formula h= -16t2 + 20t + 300
Racism! racism! RACISM!!!
See what we mean, Liberal useful idiots?
April 13, 2006 - 11:42 PM on April 13th, 2006
The traditional rude “stereotype” racism, as defined by the Jim Crow era cartoons is a black person eating watermelon (emphasis on the shinny white teeth). Condi, or any other African-american tossing a watermelon off a building for a science experiment is not racism. We did the same thing in my youth (cause watermelons smash good!)
April 13, 2006 - 11:50 PM on April 13th, 2006
Uh yeah, right…
April 13, 2006 - 11:58 PM on April 13th, 2006
Yeah, sure, heck they could have just as easily said Condi holds a shoe, or a golf ball, or apotted plant, or anything, really. Just sheer coincidence he picked a watermelon. Just chance, and chance alone, that’s it!
Tofu’s argument is probably the thinnest, most transparent attempt I have ever seen to explain away the Left’s racist, hypocritical double-standards.
It is incredible the lengths, the contortions, the pretzel “logic’ the Left will use to rationalize and explain their double standards. It’s good enough to fool the plantation dwellers, but doesn’t wash here.
April 14, 2006 - 12:28 AM on April 14th, 2006
I’m still trying to figure out how a liberal can claim to love America. Everything that they have done for years has been conterproductive to this country.
They have weakened the military while making generations of people dependent on welfare stipends instead of encouraging them to work to reach their full potential.
They’ve insisted on lowering educational standards to the lowest common denominator. They’ve preached outcome based education wherein there is no right or wrong answer as long as the student feels good about his response. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work in the real world. If you can’t read, you can’t fill out a job application no matter how good you feel about yourself. Likewise just because you think 2 plus 2 equals 5, doesn’t mean that it is.
While screaming for energy independence, they’ve effectively stopped development or use of any domestic energy sources.
While the ultra rich liberals (Kennedies, etc etc) preach that higher taxation is the route to social equality, they themselves pay virtually no taxes.
BTW the US was never intended to provide social equality, only equal opportunity. Don’t think it does? Try telling that to all of the foreignors who have moved here with nothing and become very successful in running their own businesses.
Liberals have touted gun control as a crime prevention technique despite years of evidence and numerous studies that prove that gun control does nothing but lower job related risk for criminals.
Then again, the liberals are the ones pushing to have felons have their voting rights restored. At the rate they’re going, the felons will vote to have laws concerning bank robbery, murder, and any of a number of other crimes legalized.
One liberal even advocated having the UN patrol our streets to protect us from terrorists. Considering the UN Peacekeepers’ record for poor behavior in Africa, who’s going to protect us from them?
Now exactly how has any of these historically Liberal beliefs and agendas ever been to the betterment of the US?
I can honestly tell you that you don’t find a lot of liberals in the US military. Now if they love this country so damn much, why aren’t they willing to risk their lives to defend it? If you want to see a coward, look at a liberal. Liberal programs have never been successful in the long term.
The Democratic party in this country isn’t even a party of ideas, they’ve become simply the party of opposition. It doesn’t matter what is put before them, they are going to oppose it, even plans proposed by FDR. FDR proposed the private social security accounts with his initial “New Deal” but with the all too recent stock market crash at the time, the Republicans at the time were too worried about another to go along with the plan. If the Democrats are so pro choice, why is it that they refuse to allow the rest of us the opportunity to choose how our retirement funds should be invested? Why do they deny us the opportunity to enroll in plans that they themselves have been enrolled in for years? Think liberalism is on the rise? Don’t say that to Harvard. A recent Harvard study has shown a marked increase in religious belief among college students.
Liberals talk a good game but despite their argument that they shouldn’t be judged by their failures but by their motives, the real world lives by whether you succeed or fail not what your intentions were. You may intend to be the world’s greatest fisherman, but if your kids go hungry because you can’t catch a single fish, your intentions mean nothing. Results matter. Intentions don’t. Moral victories will always be overshadowed by actual ones. Lying in a pool of your own blood because you’re too much of a pacifist to defend yourself isn’t a victory no matter how you spin it.
April 14, 2006 - 12:30 AM on April 14th, 2006
One more thing: For Dyldan, or any other insignificant wanker who demands proof that the originator of this racist math problem is a Leftist, the proof is self-contained in the issue itself (it is also self-evident) but apparently Dyldan has neither the intelligence nor analytical ability to discern it:
The author obviously hates Condoleeza Rice. And who hates Condoleeza Rice? Ding! Ding! Ding! That’s right, the Liberal/Socialist/Democrites, that’s who! (The Liberal Klux Klan). Because she done gone off de Democrite plantation and gone to work for dat George Bush!
Sorry to bore you folks with the obvious, but Dyldan clearly would never have figured it out by himself…
April 14, 2006 - 12:43 AM on April 14th, 2006
FAO, you have just posted the most concise while comprehensive analysis I have seen in a long time of the “contributions” of Liberalism, or more generally, Liberals/Socialists/Democrites (LSDs).
You articulated numerous example of their lunatic positions; this is one of my favorite:
“While screaming for energy independence, they’ve effectively stopped development or use of any domestic energy sources.”
Yes. They constantly beat the Global Warming drum, talking about greenhouse gases. In Kalifornia, 42% of all the Carbon Dioxide generated each year is from electric power generation. Seems quite logical that if they are motivated to stop Global Warming, they’d support alternatives? You could eliminate all of that in the next 20 years by going all nuclear, plus have the extra power at night to produce Hydrogen so that when the Hydrogen fuel cell is ready we can start converting autos to run on it, further reduce CO2 emission, and end dependence on foreign oil! Wow, solve 3 problems at once! Except that the eco-whackos, the Jane Fonda China Syndrome crowd, and the nuclear waste NIMBYs won’t have any of that talk.
The stupid, militant idiots! While the rest of the world goes nuclear and leaves us behind, we will still be sitting here doing the same stupid things if they continue to have their way.
April 14, 2006 - 12:14 PM on April 14th, 2006
61, FAO–BTW the US was never intended to provide social equality, only equal opportunity.
I just want to clarify what you mean. Do you think there should or should not be social equality? I’m not talking illegals here, because I know how you feel about that, I’m asking about everyone else.
April 14, 2006 - 12:18 PM on April 14th, 2006
there should be equality of opportunity, not an attempt at guaranteed equality of outcome (which is impossible, but liberals still believe in it)
April 14, 2006 - 12:24 PM on April 14th, 2006
Alyssa….if more people took the equal opportunities available to them they wouldn’t feel like they were socially unequal.
April 14, 2006 - 12:29 PM on April 14th, 2006
Humans are not made (completely) equal..deal with it.. I know liberals and communists hate to face that fact, but it’s true
WE ARE NOT ALL EQUAL, SOME ARE SMARTER, SOME ARE NOT, SOME ARE TALLER, SOME ARE STRONGER…
now, given that, the only way to ensure maximum happiness and achievement is to allow an equal opportunity to people in whatever different abilities they have
YOU CANNOT LEGISLATE EQUALITY OF OUTCOME! it’s impossible.
April 14, 2006 - 01:42 PM on April 14th, 2006
“WE ARE NOT ALL EQUAL, SOME ARE SMARTER, SOME ARE NOT, SOME ARE TALLER, SOME ARE STRONGER:”
Mike Kilo, you’re a nice guy and we actually have a lot in common, but THIS is why you are on the fringe, even in your own party.
You won’t win any minority votes talking like this, my friend. (!)
And current minority votes are the future of BOTH parties. Whites will be minorities themselves in the next decade or two…something to think about.
April 14, 2006 - 04:59 PM on April 14th, 2006
I don’t think Mike is on the fringe. People are not equal. It isn’t Mike’s responsibility to work his ass off for some lazy person that doesn’t want to work. If Mike makes $250,000 a year that is his business..it isn’t his problem that someone only make $21,000…Mike is the poster boy for the kid that was born on “the wrong side of the tracks”, but through hard work, he has made himself a success…no one was standing in line to help him, he did it on his own..that is success, and everyone has the same opportunity to turn a bad situation into a positive…
April 14, 2006 - 09:05 PM on April 14th, 2006
Dylan, you America-hating bastard. I have worked undercover during a few leftist protest and I have to say that you commies hold the title for “Hatred”. BTW, at least 90% of the protesters need a bath,,, BAD!
April 14, 2006 - 09:07 PM on April 14th, 2006
Oh,,, you can tell your leftist sisters,,, it is OK to shave their legs and underarms… I will be glad to send pictures of the “love” the left shows the US Soldiers if you like peejz.
April 14, 2006 - 11:21 PM on April 14th, 2006
Please do John and stay safe my friend!:smile:
April 16, 2006 - 11:30 AM on April 16th, 2006
Rice is just one more tool, what Robert said sound good to me.
April 19, 2006 - 08:50 AM on April 19th, 2006
UPDATE: Condoleezza Rice Watermelon Math Problem. See The Actual Test.
As I mentioned in my round-up of unhinged teachers last week, and Michelle Malkin had full coverage of here and here, a professor at Bellevue Community College included (wrote) the following, racially charged math question on a test: Condoleezza holds…
April 27, 2006 - 09:55 AM on April 27th, 2006
Just wanted to point out some assumptions in the postings here. First, that the instructor involved is liberal in his politics, and for that reason formulated this problem. Have any of you even read his explanation? The point is not his politics; I would be as offended by this if any prominent black American’s name had been used. To turn this into a political issue misses the point: how can an experienced college educator, in the cultural climate in which we all live, not be aware that his words are insensitive at best, and racist at worst? Conservatives appear to only address racial issues when they involve conservative Americans of color. Liberals are offended by ALL racisim, not just that which involves the “right people.”
April 27, 2006 - 10:23 AM on April 27th, 2006
Liberals are offended by ALL racisim, not just that which involves the “right people.
With all the racist remarks and actions taken from the liberal left that I have witnessed I have a hard time swallowing this statement.
April 27, 2006 - 10:30 AM on April 27th, 2006
Tess..what planet do you live on?
April 27, 2006 - 10:57 AM on April 27th, 2006
I think Tess is on to something there…
Indeed Liberals ARE offended by all racism.
Like I said earlier, until the conservatives/republicans get more than 11% of the black vote…your side doesn’t have a leg to stand on.
You guys can yell “Dem’s are racist” till you turn blue in the face, but it doesn’t change the UNDENIABLE FACT that blacks like Democrat policy better. And their votes reflect that.
Why would blacks vote for a racist party?
April 27, 2006 - 11:14 AM on April 27th, 2006
Liberals LOVE racism… it gets them the 2 things they need more than anything, money and votes
shit, liberals run to racism like fireman to a blaze..they LIVE for it!
April 27, 2006 - 11:15 AM on April 27th, 2006
and if it aint there..they’ll make some up, by god!!!
April 27, 2006 - 11:19 AM on April 27th, 2006
“…liberals run to racism like fireman to a blaze..they LIVE for it!”
Mike, you’re right. Most Liberals LOVE to spot and fight racism wherever it rears it’s ugly head.
I understand your sides frustration with this. No one likes to be called out as a closet – or wide open – racist. It’s human nature to lash out at those who call our shenanigans.
April 27, 2006 - 11:20 AM on April 27th, 2006
hahaha… fight it.. hardly
they love to exploit it, grandstand, blackmail for money and act like massa!
April 27, 2006 - 11:23 AM on April 27th, 2006
and you keep trumpeting this “republicans only get 11% of the black vote”
you think voting 90%+ for one party is a GOOD thing?
there are only certain regimes that get over 90% of any vote..
Saddam’s Iraq
Hitler
Mussolini
Stalin
Castro
wait a minute..yep..the democrat party fits pretty well on that list.
blacks have done themselves a disservice by placing all of their eggs into the basket of those who benefit by keeping them poor and ignorant.
..but times will change, my friend…they will.
April 27, 2006 - 11:25 AM on April 27th, 2006
Mike, come on man – you’re just bitter because your side is on the receiving end of the critisism…:!:
April 27, 2006 - 11:27 AM on April 27th, 2006
It aint my side calling people uncle toms and aunt jemimahs..it aint my side chaining poor black children into baby-sitting gulags… it aint my side who views minorities as stupid, lazy and incapable of making it without whitey’s help..
April 27, 2006 - 11:28 AM on April 27th, 2006
“you think voting 90%+ for one party is a GOOD thing?”
I understand what you are saying, I really do. But I think the 90& figure should be a wake up call to republicans (and it has, remember when GOP chair apologized to blacks lat year?).
If your side wants some of those votes, you must do some pandering. That’s how our democracy works.
Get some policy created that blacks feel comfortable with, then they might vote for your team more.
April 27, 2006 - 11:30 AM on April 27th, 2006
“it aint my side who views minorities as stupid, lazy and incapable of making it without whitey’s help…”
that’s ad hominem, my friend.
I doubt you’ll find that on any Democratic party platform.
April 27, 2006 - 11:52 AM on April 27th, 2006
yeah, they don’t say it…but look at their actions, buddy.
April 27, 2006 - 01:53 PM on April 27th, 2006
SF Liberal said:
I think Tess is on to something there:
Indeed Liberals ARE offended by all racism.
Except by their own, of course!
April 27, 2006 - 02:44 PM on April 27th, 2006
“Except by their own, of course!”
No, offended by all.
April 27, 2006 - 04:40 PM on April 27th, 2006
Mike, you’re right. Most Liberals LOVE to spot and fight racism wherever it
rears it’s ugly head.
Except when it is against a conservative like Michael Steele or Condie Rice!
September 17, 2007 - 08:49 AM on September 17th, 2007
I’m sorry, but I just don’t understand… I’m guessing I’m missing some kind of context (I grew up in Europe) because how is someone throwing a watermelon related to racism? If the same thing was written with Bill Clinton instead, would it be racism against whites?
Please explain!
September 17, 2007 - 09:43 AM on September 17th, 2007
Watermelon and fried chicken are used as a racial slur against blacks, therefore to substitute Bill Clinton in place of Secretary Of State Condoleeza Rice, would not be racist.
September 17, 2007 - 10:09 PM on September 17th, 2007
sorry i just had never heard of it!
September 24, 2007 - 08:18 AM on September 24th, 2007
Robert? Robert Downs?
May 30, 2009 - 07:09 PM on May 30th, 2009
You have all lost sight of a major issue. In a desperate attempt to seem more progressive and racially astute, you have all helped widen the gap between minorities and mainstream society. The longer they are treated differently the more different they will become. None of this is new to Americans. America has had minorities become the majority since its foundation. Blacks are treated differently by both sides; smothered by progressives and despised by conservatives. Asians are of a different color, but despite all the racial prejudice against them (past and present), they attempt to integrate. Blacks do not integrate. This is because of intense differential treatment, again, by both sides. If they cannot succeed, then they do not deserve to. We should not prop them up so they can use it as a crutch. We should not suppress them so they can use THAT as a crutch.
Blacks in general need to adapt as well, not just us. The more we adapt to them, the more our culture and our values are dissolved by outsiders. You do not see this in any other culture. The other day in Bellevue I walked down the street and pointed at a car as it passed me by to admire it. The driver just so happened to be black. He pulled over and threatened to shoot me for pointing at his car. This is unacceptable, but this is what differential treatment creates. Racism is created by both parties; those who refuse to integrate and those who refuse to accept integration. Unfortunately for the outsiders, it is their task to integrate despite such obstacles. The more they do not, the more they are different. If I cannot walk down the street in BELLEVUE WASHINGTON without being accosted by an angry black man, the more racism will exist. Both sides do need to soften, but it is the outsider’s responsibility to become an insider, not to leech off the system and assault those whom he imagines as his oppressors. This is not new at all, but blacks want to be special and top dogs. You have to work to become top dog.