<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hugh Hewitt Interviews Doyle McManus of the LA Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightvoices.com/2006/06/26/hugh-hewitt-interviews-doyle-mcmanus-of-the-la-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightvoices.com/2006/06/26/hugh-hewitt-interviews-doyle-mcmanus-of-the-la-times/</link>
	<description>in all matter of opinion, our adversaries are insane.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:20:40 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Flopping Aces Â» Blog Archive &#187; Senator Obama and His Commitment to Israel</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2006/06/26/hugh-hewitt-interviews-doyle-mcmanus-of-the-la-times/comment-page-1/#comment-731641</link>
		<dc:creator>Flopping Aces Â» Blog Archive &#187; Senator Obama and His Commitment to Israel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2006/06/26/hugh-hewitt-interviews-doyle-mcmanus-of-the-la-times/#comment-731641</guid>
		<description>[...] When the Times published stories on the SWIFT program used to track terrorist financing, I interviewed the Times&#8217; D.C. bureau chief, Doyle McManus. Here&#8217;s the core of that interview: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When the Times published stories on the SWIFT program used to track terrorist financing, I interviewed the Times&#8217; D.C. bureau chief, Doyle McManus. Here&#8217;s the core of that interview: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrmrArtyOffcr</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2006/06/26/hugh-hewitt-interviews-doyle-mcmanus-of-the-la-times/comment-page-1/#comment-236128</link>
		<dc:creator>FrmrArtyOffcr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 04:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2006/06/26/hugh-hewitt-interviews-doyle-mcmanus-of-the-la-times/#comment-236128</guid>
		<description>Well now that the precedent has been set that the US should have appoint a special prosecutor to investigate who leaked non classified information about Valerie Plame, I wonder if that means we can appoint one to investigate who is leaking real CLASSIFIED information to the the press about this, the Gen. Casey troop reduction plan, the NSA terrorist monitoring program and the phone records monitoring program? I want to see how long these &quot;Principled&quot; journalists are willing to protect their sources when they realize that if they don&#039;t identify who is their source, they&#039;ll sit in prison until they do. Imprisonment for contempt of court is for the discretion of the judge.

Seeing as they are so contemptuous of the administration, I wonder how contemptuous they will be of a judge who can throw them behind bars indefinitely. While they are not necessarily in violation of the law for printing the information, the people who gave it to them ARE. I have no problem with jailing the reporters until they reveal their sources, nor do I have any problem with throwing their sources down a well where they can never do harm to another US intelligence program and endanger US lives again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well now that the precedent has been set that the US should have appoint a special prosecutor to investigate who leaked non classified information about Valerie Plame, I wonder if that means we can appoint one to investigate who is leaking real CLASSIFIED information to the the press about this, the Gen. Casey troop reduction plan, the NSA terrorist monitoring program and the phone records monitoring program? I want to see how long these &#8220;Principled&#8221; journalists are willing to protect their sources when they realize that if they don&#8217;t identify who is their source, they&#8217;ll sit in prison until they do. Imprisonment for contempt of court is for the discretion of the judge.</p>
<p>Seeing as they are so contemptuous of the administration, I wonder how contemptuous they will be of a judge who can throw them behind bars indefinitely. While they are not necessarily in violation of the law for printing the information, the people who gave it to them ARE. I have no problem with jailing the reporters until they reveal their sources, nor do I have any problem with throwing their sources down a well where they can never do harm to another US intelligence program and endanger US lives again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
