Comments on: What Standards Does The NYT’s Use When Leaking Classified Material? http://rightvoices.com/2006/06/26/what-standards-does-the-nyts-use-when-leaking-classified-material/ in all matter of opinion, our adversaries are insane. Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:05:09 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: FrmrArtyOffcr http://rightvoices.com/2006/06/26/what-standards-does-the-nyts-use-when-leaking-classified-material/comment-page-1/#comment-236921 FrmrArtyOffcr Tue, 04 Jul 2006 05:13:47 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2006/06/26/what-standards-does-the-nyts-use-when-leaking-classified-material/#comment-236921 Better yet Robert, send in the BATFE and tell them someone has an unregistered automatic weapon in the building or the records to show that they've been making them. ATF agents have torn entire offices apart and absconded with records for MONTHS without a warrant or any evidence of wrongdoing on nothing but a "Hunch". Want to hear a serious breach of the 4th amendment? Any licensed gun dealer can have his business <em>and HOME</em> searched without a warrant by the ATF for any reason. BTW they don't pay to repair any of the damages either. Tell them that there's a machine gun diassembled and hidden inside one of the presses at the NYT and the presses would be shredded looking for it. Then again if you really want the ATF to go in in force, tell them the NYT is a well armed religious cult with automatice weapons hidden throught the building. The entire building would end up looking like ground zero. Look at what the ATF did at Waco. Better yet Robert, send in the BATFE and tell them someone has an unregistered automatic weapon in the building or the records to show that they’ve been making them. ATF agents have torn entire offices apart and absconded with records for MONTHS without a warrant or any evidence of wrongdoing on nothing but a “Hunch”. Want to hear a serious breach of the 4th amendment? Any licensed gun dealer can have his business and HOME searched without a warrant by the ATF for any reason. BTW they don’t pay to repair any of the damages either. Tell them that there’s a machine gun diassembled and hidden inside one of the presses at the NYT and the presses would be shredded looking for it. Then again if you really want the ATF to go in in force, tell them the NYT is a well armed religious cult with automatice weapons hidden throught the building. The entire building would end up looking like ground zero. Look at what the ATF did at Waco.

]]> By: Robert http://rightvoices.com/2006/06/26/what-standards-does-the-nyts-use-when-leaking-classified-material/comment-page-1/#comment-234777 Robert Mon, 26 Jun 2006 22:10:29 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2006/06/26/what-standards-does-the-nyts-use-when-leaking-classified-material/#comment-234777 NYT = New York Slimes. A degenerate, boll weevil, treasonous rag that should be shut down immediately. If they read it at West Point, it probably is for educational purposes, as an example of the fifth column trying to destroy America from within. The domestic face of the enemy... I say send in Janet Reno's goon squad, you know, the jackboots with the MP5s? Tell them there's a 5-yr old kid in the office of the Times that doesn't want to go back to Cuba. They'll turn that place inside out! Maybe we'll even get to see a picture of Arthur Sulzburger grimacing in terror with an MP5 pointed at his face. :lol: NYT = New York Slimes. A degenerate, boll weevil, treasonous rag that should be shut down immediately. If they read it at West Point, it probably is for educational purposes, as an example of the fifth column trying to destroy America from within. The domestic face of the enemy…

I say send in Janet Reno’s goon squad, you know, the jackboots with the MP5s? Tell them there’s a 5-yr old kid in the office of the Times that doesn’t want to go back to Cuba.

They’ll turn that place inside out! Maybe we’ll even get to see a picture of Arthur Sulzburger grimacing in terror with an MP5 pointed at his face. :lol:

]]> By: san francisco liberal http://rightvoices.com/2006/06/26/what-standards-does-the-nyts-use-when-leaking-classified-material/comment-page-1/#comment-234768 san francisco liberal Mon, 26 Jun 2006 21:25:27 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2006/06/26/what-standards-does-the-nyts-use-when-leaking-classified-material/#comment-234768 hey, that's MY line! thief!! :wink: hey, that’s MY line!

thief!! :wink:

]]> By: BonBon http://rightvoices.com/2006/06/26/what-standards-does-the-nyts-use-when-leaking-classified-material/comment-page-1/#comment-234754 BonBon Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:16:58 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2006/06/26/what-standards-does-the-nyts-use-when-leaking-classified-material/#comment-234754 San Fran.....you truly are pathetic. Too bad you just...don't.....get.....IT. San Fran…..you truly are pathetic.

Too bad you just…don’t…..get…..IT.

]]> By: snowy egret http://rightvoices.com/2006/06/26/what-standards-does-the-nyts-use-when-leaking-classified-material/comment-page-1/#comment-234743 snowy egret Mon, 26 Jun 2006 18:33:18 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2006/06/26/what-standards-does-the-nyts-use-when-leaking-classified-material/#comment-234743 The New York Sewer shows its true aligence to the terrorists :mad: The New York Sewer shows its true aligence to the terrorists :mad:

]]> By: san francisco liberal http://rightvoices.com/2006/06/26/what-standards-does-the-nyts-use-when-leaking-classified-material/comment-page-1/#comment-234732 san francisco liberal Mon, 26 Jun 2006 18:04:22 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2006/06/26/what-standards-does-the-nyts-use-when-leaking-classified-material/#comment-234732 YAWN... next. YAWN…

next.

]]> By: san francisco liberal http://rightvoices.com/2006/06/26/what-standards-does-the-nyts-use-when-leaking-classified-material/comment-page-1/#comment-234730 san francisco liberal Mon, 26 Jun 2006 18:02:12 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2006/06/26/what-standards-does-the-nyts-use-when-leaking-classified-material/#comment-234730 The link for the NYT defense was blocked, so I took the liberty of publishing some of their response: <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060626/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_terrorist_financing" rel="nofollow">link</a> <em>In a note on the paper's Web site Sunday, Executive Editor Bill Keller said <strong>the Times spent weeks discussing with Bush administration officials whether to publish the report.</strong> He said part of the government's argument was that the anti-terror program would no longer be effective if it became known, because international bankers would be unwilling to cooperate and terrorists would find other ways to move money. "We don't know what the banking consortium will do, but we found this argument puzzling," Keller said, pointing out that the banks were under subpoena to provide the information. <strong>"The Bush Administration and America itself may be unpopular in Europe these days, but policing the byways of international terror seems to have pretty strong support everywhere."</strong> The note to readers was published the same day Rep. Peter King urged the Bush administration to prosecute the paper. "We're at war, and for the Times to release information about secret operations and methods is treasonous," the New York Republican told The Associated Press. Keller said the administration also argued "in a halfhearted way" that disclosure of the program "would lead terrorists to change tactics." But Keller wrote that the Treasury Department has "trumpeted ... that the U.S. makes every effort to track international financing of terror. Terror financiers know this, which is why they have already moved as much as they can to cruder methods. But they also continue to use the international banking system, because it is immeasurably more efficient than toting suitcases of cash."</em> The link for the NYT defense was blocked, so I took the liberty of publishing some of their response: link

In a note on the paper’s Web site Sunday, Executive Editor Bill Keller said the Times spent weeks discussing with Bush administration officials whether to publish the report.

He said part of the government’s argument was that the anti-terror program would no longer be effective if it became known, because international bankers would be unwilling to cooperate and terrorists would find other ways to move money.

“We don’t know what the banking consortium will do, but we found this argument puzzling,” Keller said, pointing out that the banks were under subpoena to provide the information. “The Bush Administration and America itself may be unpopular in Europe these days, but policing the byways of international terror seems to have pretty strong support everywhere.”

The note to readers was published the same day Rep. Peter King urged the Bush administration to prosecute the paper.

“We’re at war, and for the Times to release information about secret operations and methods is treasonous,” the New York Republican told The Associated Press.

Keller said the administration also argued “in a halfhearted way” that disclosure of the program “would lead terrorists to change tactics.”

But Keller wrote that the Treasury Department has “trumpeted … that the U.S. makes every effort to track international financing of terror. Terror financiers know this, which is why they have already moved as much as they can to cruder methods. But they also continue to use the international banking system, because it is immeasurably more efficient than toting suitcases of cash.”

]]> By: Flopping Aces » Blog Archive » The Best Kept Secret? http://rightvoices.com/2006/06/26/what-standards-does-the-nyts-use-when-leaking-classified-material/comment-page-1/#comment-234705 Flopping Aces » Blog Archive » The Best Kept Secret? Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:03:26 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2006/06/26/what-standards-does-the-nyts-use-when-leaking-classified-material/#comment-234705 [...] Right Voices [...] [...] Right Voices [...]

]]>