Comments on: 14 Arrested In Anti-Terror Raids in London http://rightvoices.com/2006/09/02/14-arrested-in-anti-terror-raids-in-london/ in all matter of opinion, our adversaries are insane. Sun, 08 Aug 2010 14:43:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: Peejz http://rightvoices.com/2006/09/02/14-arrested-in-anti-terror-raids-in-london/comment-page-1/#comment-247231 Peejz Sat, 02 Sep 2006 16:18:17 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2006/09/02/14-arrested-in-anti-terror-raids-in-london/#comment-247231 AMEN! <a href="http://rightvoices.com/2006/09/02/abc-docudrama-blames-clinton-for-911/" rel="nofollow">See my new post about the documentary</a>! AMEN! See my new post about the documentary!

]]> By: FrmrArtyOffcr http://rightvoices.com/2006/09/02/14-arrested-in-anti-terror-raids-in-london/comment-page-1/#comment-247230 FrmrArtyOffcr Sat, 02 Sep 2006 16:10:23 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2006/09/02/14-arrested-in-anti-terror-raids-in-london/#comment-247230 I read this story online and it mentioned that the arrests were the result of cooperation between the police and British intelligence services. The very kind of cooperation that the Jaime Gorelick wall was put into place to stop. The very same type of cooperation that would've probably stopped 9/11 because multiple intelligence agencies knew about Atta's and other terrorists' ties to Al Quaeda, knew they were in the country, and had reason to believe they were planning something, but were unable to share that intelligence with the FBI. Just imagine what might have happened had the Phoenix FBI flight school memo had been combined with the CIA and Able Danger (Army Intelligence) information about the terrorists' ties to Al Quaeda in Germany and the Middle East 72 hours BEFORE 9/11 instead of 72 hours afterwards. With the fact that the Democrats would like to reinstate Gorelick's wall in mind, does anyone really believe that the Democrats are strong on defense? Or perhaps the Dems really do believe that the rights of the Muslims to commit violent criminal acts outweigh the rights of everyone else on that flight to actually live their lives in peace. BTW has anyone heard about the ABC miniseries on what lead up to 9/11? It strictly sticks to documentable facts and paints a VERY unflattering picture of the Clinton administration's 8 years in office. Reportedly there have been a flood of complaints from Clinton staffers and Billy BJ is reportedly planning on calling the CEO of Disney (ABC's parent company) to ask that it be reedited to not be so harsh (leave out a lot of facts) on his administration if not pulled from being shown entirely. Rush reports that in one scene, a CIA/ Northern Alliance strike team had Osama Bin Laden's hideout surrounded, but when they called in for permission to hit it, the team leader was told that they wouldn't authorize it because the press over civilian casualties would be too bad. Reportedly he was told by Sandy (oh gee look what fell into my pants leg) Berger that if he chose to strike the house and the press got wind of civilian casualties, it'd be on his head. The strike team leader pulled back his team. Personally, I'd have hit the house, wiped out everyone inside and released a statement to the press that the massacre was the result of intertribal/taliban conflict or rigged the whole thing to blow sky high and said it was the result of an accident at an Al Quaeda bomb making facility. I read this story online and it mentioned that the arrests were the result of cooperation between the police and British intelligence services. The very kind of cooperation that the Jaime Gorelick wall was put into place to stop. The very same type of cooperation that would’ve probably stopped 9/11 because multiple intelligence agencies knew about Atta’s and other terrorists’ ties to Al Quaeda, knew they were in the country, and had reason to believe they were planning something, but were unable to share that intelligence with the FBI. Just imagine what might have happened had the Phoenix FBI flight school memo had been combined with the CIA and Able Danger (Army Intelligence) information about the terrorists’ ties to Al Quaeda in Germany and the Middle East 72 hours BEFORE 9/11 instead of 72 hours afterwards. With the fact that the Democrats would like to reinstate Gorelick’s wall in mind, does anyone really believe that the Democrats are strong on defense? Or perhaps the Dems really do believe that the rights of the Muslims to commit violent criminal acts outweigh the rights of everyone else on that flight to actually live their lives in peace.

BTW has anyone heard about the ABC miniseries on what lead up to 9/11? It strictly sticks to documentable facts and paints a VERY unflattering picture of the Clinton administration’s 8 years in office. Reportedly there have been a flood of complaints from Clinton staffers and Billy BJ is reportedly planning on calling the CEO of Disney (ABC’s parent company) to ask that it be reedited to not be so harsh (leave out a lot of facts) on his administration if not pulled from being shown entirely. Rush reports that in one scene, a CIA/ Northern Alliance strike team had Osama Bin Laden’s hideout surrounded, but when they called in for permission to hit it, the team leader was told that they wouldn’t authorize it because the press over civilian casualties would be too bad. Reportedly he was told by Sandy (oh gee look what fell into my pants leg) Berger that if he chose to strike the house and the press got wind of civilian casualties, it’d be on his head. The strike team leader pulled back his team.

Personally, I’d have hit the house, wiped out everyone inside and released a statement to the press that the massacre was the result of intertribal/taliban conflict or rigged the whole thing to blow sky high and said it was the result of an accident at an Al Quaeda bomb making facility.

]]>