Comments on: Democrats are simply not serious about the war or about preventing terrorism.

By: Peejz

Peejz — Sat, 16 Sep 2006 19:53:09 +0000

Well leveling the M.E. isn’t an option nor is assasinating the Mullahs..Peace treaties are a joke as they are hell-bent on destroying the State of Israel.

By: Zelda

Zelda — Sat, 16 Sep 2006 18:15:42 +0000

I am saying that the nut-job Muslims in Iraq haven’t been dealt with in a way that will effectively neutralize them; our tactics in Iraq and elsewhere aren’t working.

By: Peejz

Peejz — Sat, 16 Sep 2006 03:17:21 +0000

21- (And the nut jobs in Iraq haven’t been dealt with in a way that will render them ineffective) What are you suggesting here?

By: Zelda

Zelda — Sat, 16 Sep 2006 02:04:52 +0000

“The characterization of the opposition party to use every small mistake as political leverage instead of being interested in finding a genuine resolution to those problems. To say the Dems have a solution to the problem of Iraq is idiocy, as they are as much of the problem as Bushco.â€
President Bush has had 5 years of control. He has had the support of the Senate and the House; and the American people. He will continue to have the support of the Senate and the House for probably 2 more years. The great irony of President Bush defeating Senator Kerry is that whatever happens in Iraq will be entirely on President Bush’s shoulders.
The Democrat don’t have any solution because President Bush’s people have fucked things up too much to fix them. (And the nut jobs in Iraq haven’t been dealt with in a way that will render them ineffective)

By: Zelda

Zelda — Sat, 16 Sep 2006 02:02:30 +0000

“The problem is how we have reacted to those mistakes.â€

President Bush’s administration hasn’t recognized ANY mistakes. How can you fix something if you don’t admit it is messed up???

“the problem is how we have reacted to those mistakes.â€

Agreed:

By: FrmrArtyOffcr

FrmrArtyOffcr — Fri, 15 Sep 2006 05:25:10 +0000

Personally, I find it almost painful to even listen to Arianna Huffington speak. She and Susan Estridge both. Not only are their arguments so weak on logic and poorly thought out, but their voices are like nails on the chalkboard. You would think that people with their kind of money could afford either a good speech pathologist or a good speaking coach to improve their diction. I can barely understand Susan Estridge half of the time. Huffington has this major Zsa Zsa Gabor accent that drives me crazy as well. It doesn’t help that she comes off with a “Let them eat cake” arrogance either.

By: Peejz

Peejz — Fri, 15 Sep 2006 04:41:14 +0000

17- Correct. Bloggers on both sides of the aisle know how to manipulate the system. You can manipulate a subjects exposure on google. Take for instance The Path To 911. Controversial to say the least…Michelle Malkin suggested those on the right bombard technocrati with positive news of the film..just make sure to state the title in your post..on the left, and the name of the site escapes me, but I believe MyDD, told their audience to do the same, but pan the film etc…The sites with the highest exposur are going to be the first ones found in a google search.

Both sites are wrong for manipulation!

Now take the gen whatevers…They aren’t listening to the radio, as they are going to websites for music..they have Myspace for discussion forums and they hit the big blogs..this isn’t just the left either. Make no mistake that ignorance knows no boundaries!

There is nothing wrong with getting info from blogs, but there is something dangerous about believing everything you read without checking to make sure you aren’t getting snowballed.

I used Ariannas comment as an example..she appeared on Fox News…therefore, she must know what she’s talking about..as she is speaking they are posting her web address. Well she was on Fox and she has a website where Senators speak, therefore she must know what she talking about…Now you know better, but take a look around…you are one of the few..the proud.:wink:

By: TedintheShed

TedintheShed — Fri, 15 Sep 2006 04:14:49 +0000

16.

It is worse than sad. Our founding fathers understood that if governement controls the media, then they control the masses. This is why a free press is in the Constitution. Well, through bloggers this is what the parties are doing. They are controling the masses.

By: Peejz

Peejz — Fri, 15 Sep 2006 04:05:47 +0000

It is sad and it’s true. Radio and newsprint is taking a hit big time. Google a subject and 9 out of 10 times, you are sent to a blog for the information requested.

By: TedintheShed

TedintheShed — Fri, 15 Sep 2006 04:02:50 +0000

14.

If peoiple get their news from bloggers, then people are bigger fools than even I thought they were and my Father’s America is pretty much dead.