There’s nothing wrong with that life style, just ask Barbra Boxer or Nancy Poluci!

Tim

That’s a joke, right? Both parties claim moral high ground, as John Kerry did in the previous elections (“Bunch of crooks…”), Ted Kennedy and the rest of the leadership.

So, give me a break, and I will impose upon you that reality check.

I believe that Hastert was made aware of the 1st set of emails and not the sexually explicit ones..if that is true, then he could have let the other party know, but there really wasn’t anything in them that would warrant any action. In other words, I think that one could say that you and I could read more into them than was actually there. If Hastert was in possession of sexually explicit materials, that is quite another story! Yes at that point it was his duty to act!

10- I guess I am not getting the point of what kos and others are getting at. The quote was in reference to the rumors about Foley’s homosexuality. Do kos and others want the right to continue to gay bash or could it be that they aren’t really all that accepting of gays…

You never complained when “Billy Blow Job” was sexually harassing the Interns.

Kilo owes me one.

Tony Perkins of Dobson’s Family Research Counsel was on CNN earlier and I think we are hearing the contours of the Christian Right’s argument. They are going with Newt Gingrich’s formulation: Poor Denny was afraid of being called a gay basher so he didn’t say anything.

So let me understand this. A sexual child predator wasn’t exposed by the because the Republican’s were afraid of being called gay bashers?

I think, at the least, we both agree that our guts tell us he is guilty of the overall charges, yes? Our differences are in that I am ready to bury any and all politicos in DC who knew of Foley’s behavoir and did nothing. You, I believe, are attempting to protect the same.

From Rick Moran:

Stop Sex Predators came on line in late July with one post announcing its intention to “serve as a clearing house for the public to report sex predators and as a resource for concerned parents and citizens.”

[:]The fourth and last post for the entire month of August was a cut and paste from Wikpedia of the Gary Condit affair. More “political predators”on a site dedicated to sex predators in general? Why?

Then in September there were two more posts until Sept 21st where Foley is mentioned for the first time.

I have been away for a while, so please accept my apologies for the lack of blog posts. BUT:.while I was away, the blog has been noticed and some shocking emails have been received! I can hardly believe it! I’m posting each one below. It’s proof that the Congressional Corruption of the past is alive and well today. It’s up to us to expose it and stop this predatory harassment! Please promote the blog and email any further information to stopsexpredators@gmail.com . Together we will make a difference!

Rick asks the same thing any of us would. How in the world did someone “notice”this blog with all of 6 posts and only started in July? How far down in google do you think this blog would be? Waaaaaay down.

Why would anyone notice this blog? It has posted nothing original in its short existence. The rare postings means that it has not built up any audience whatsoever. The first Technorati reference to the blog is from two days ago. Even a Google search doesn’t show it on the first 10 pages when searching for “Stop Sex Predators.”

And yet, 3 separate people who had contact with Congressman Foley somehow found this website independent of one another and supposedly sent emails to the owner of this site to complain about Foley’s inappropriate behavior.

Possible? Yes. Probable? I’ll let you decide.

This is a posting at Blog Active back on March 4, 2005:Look at this link from Gatewaypundit

Here are the threats and plans to destroy Mark Foley printed at a Leftist-haters blog back in March of 2005:

Birds of a Feather
Two haters, one picture:
Gay-bashing straight man John Ashcroft and Gay-bashing gay man Mark Foley

**COMING MONDAY ON BLOGACTIVE:** The entire Mark Foley story:Read about my recorded discussions with staff members and former staff members of Rep. Mark Foley:Read about how Mark Foley hit on men less than half his age at the Republican convention:Read about how Mark Foley voted to remove protections from those same young gay men and lesbians and anyone else violating a local discrimination law!!!

And back in 2004 there were open threats in the Washington Blade by Rogers targeting Foley:

20 offices said targeted
Not likely, say Mike Rogers and John Aravosis, the two men loosely heading an ongoing outing campaign on the Hill. As the date nears for a Senate vote on the Federal Marriage Amendment, which would ban gay marriages in the Constitution, Rogers said the outings have picked up steam ” from 13 documented offices to nearly 20 currently on a target list provided by Rogers to the Blade.

Both members of Congress have long been the subject of rumors about their sexual orientation.
Foley abused his position and may have been involved in criminal activity.