Comments on: How Networks Distort a Good Economy and Batter President Bush http://rightvoices.com/2006/10/19/how-networks-distort-a-good-economy-and-batter-president-bush/ in all matter of opinion, our adversaries are insane. Sun, 08 Aug 2010 14:43:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: snowy egret http://rightvoices.com/2006/10/19/how-networks-distort-a-good-economy-and-batter-president-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-258873 snowy egret Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:05:38 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2006/10/19/how-networks-distort-a-good-economy-and-batter-president-bush/#comment-258873 So whats wrong with gas prices going down is it a hinious crime for gas prices to fall?:lol: So whats wrong with gas prices going down is it a hinious crime for gas prices to fall?:lol:

]]> By: Fred Dawes http://rightvoices.com/2006/10/19/how-networks-distort-a-good-economy-and-batter-president-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-258661 Fred Dawes Fri, 20 Oct 2006 01:46:56 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2006/10/19/how-networks-distort-a-good-economy-and-batter-president-bush/#comment-258661 wait until the end of 2007, it may not be as good as you think:oops: the stock market will go up and up to about 16,000 and after that come down to almost 0. when that happens the real wars will start and may god help you all. buy land away from the big population areas buy guns to save your families. but if i am wrong buy more and have fun. wait until the end of 2007, it may not be as good as you think:oops:
the stock market will go up and up to about 16,000 and after that come down to almost 0. when that happens the real wars will start and may god help you all. buy land away from the big population areas buy guns to save your families. but if i am wrong buy more and have fun.

]]> By: Peejz http://rightvoices.com/2006/10/19/how-networks-distort-a-good-economy-and-batter-president-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-258656 Peejz Fri, 20 Oct 2006 01:35:10 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2006/10/19/how-networks-distort-a-good-economy-and-batter-president-bush/#comment-258656 Zelda, the Dow reaching 12,000 is huge and there is a great deal more than your 30 stock explanation. The Dow is a good indicator of how the economy is functioning. It is the job of the POTUS to have sound economic policies in place and like it or not, they are responsible for the policies they set forth which have an effect on the stock market Zelda, the Dow reaching 12,000 is huge and there is a great deal more than your 30 stock explanation. The Dow is a good indicator of how the economy is functioning. It is the job of the POTUS to have sound economic policies in place and like it or not, they are responsible for the policies they set forth which have an effect on the stock market

]]> By: Zelda http://rightvoices.com/2006/10/19/how-networks-distort-a-good-economy-and-batter-president-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-258655 Zelda Fri, 20 Oct 2006 01:22:06 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2006/10/19/how-networks-distort-a-good-economy-and-batter-president-bush/#comment-258655 Sorry, I meant GM stock; not GW. (Ha; GM has done better than GW. in the last year) Sorry for the type-O Sorry, I meant GM stock; not GW.

(Ha; GM has done better than GW. in the last year) Sorry for the type-O

]]> By: Zelda http://rightvoices.com/2006/10/19/how-networks-distort-a-good-economy-and-batter-president-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-258652 Zelda Fri, 20 Oct 2006 01:20:08 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2006/10/19/how-networks-distort-a-good-economy-and-batter-president-bush/#comment-258652 "The Dow reaching 12,000 is huge considering all the factors that drive it:It is the POTUS's job to have economic polices in place to keep the economy growing or at the very least not going downwards:” 1. The Dow reaching 12,000 isn't huge by any measure. (Unless perhaps you bought a bunch of GW stock a year ago) The Dow is only 30 stocks. 2. President Bush isn't responsible for the Dow at 12,000 any more than President Clinton is responsible for the Dow at 11,722 eight years ago. 3. I'm still happy to see the Dow at 12,000. “The Dow reaching 12,000 is huge considering all the factors that drive it:It is the POTUS’s job to have economic polices in place to keep the economy growing or at the very least not going downwards:”

1. The Dow reaching 12,000 isn’t huge by any measure. (Unless perhaps you bought a bunch of GW stock a year ago) The Dow is only 30 stocks.

2. President Bush isn’t responsible for the Dow at 12,000 any more than President Clinton is responsible for the Dow at 11,722 eight years ago.

3. I’m still happy to see the Dow at 12,000.

]]> By: Peejz http://rightvoices.com/2006/10/19/how-networks-distort-a-good-economy-and-batter-president-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-258648 Peejz Fri, 20 Oct 2006 01:08:49 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2006/10/19/how-networks-distort-a-good-economy-and-batter-president-bush/#comment-258648 I agree that things are easy to manipulate, but i disagree on you Dow outlook. The Dow reaching 12,000 is huge considering all the factors that drive it...It is the POTUS's job to have economic polices in place to keep the economy growing or at the very least not going downwards... I agree that things are easy to manipulate, but i disagree on you Dow outlook. The Dow reaching 12,000 is huge considering all the factors that drive it…It is the POTUS’s job to have economic polices in place to keep the economy growing or at the very least not going downwards…

]]> By: Stanford Matthews http://rightvoices.com/2006/10/19/how-networks-distort-a-good-economy-and-batter-president-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-258640 Stanford Matthews Fri, 20 Oct 2006 00:45:24 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2006/10/19/how-networks-distort-a-good-economy-and-batter-president-bush/#comment-258640 The media, surveys, polls and statistics are easy to manipulate. Spin works on them too. Making a big deal in the news about the DOW reaching 12000, considering when it first reached 11000, is silly. As well, if you look at the labor dept graph of unemployment figures for the last 14 years you can see a linear decline in unemployment until Bush was in office. I don't hold the President responsible for that, but lately I hear comments about the improving job market. That's crap. Blaming a President or praising him for the economic condition makes little sense in a TEAM sport which running a country is. You might care to review the inflation rate for the last several years and compare what you spend over the same period on most products and services. I suspect you will find that the prices you are paying are higher than the inflation rate. My personal opinion is the economy is stagnant and I do not blame the President. I have other things to blame him for but not that. The media, surveys, polls and statistics are easy to manipulate. Spin works on them too. Making a big deal in the news about the DOW reaching 12000, considering when it first reached 11000, is silly. As well, if you look at the labor dept graph of unemployment figures for the last 14 years you can see a linear decline in unemployment until Bush was in office. I don’t hold the President responsible for that, but lately I hear comments about the improving job market. That’s crap. Blaming a President or praising him for the economic condition makes little sense in a TEAM sport which running a country is.
You might care to review the inflation rate for the last several years and compare what you spend over the same period on most products and services. I suspect you will find that the prices you are paying are higher than the inflation rate.
My personal opinion is the economy is stagnant and I do not blame the President. I have other things to blame him for but not that.

]]> By: bill http://rightvoices.com/2006/10/19/how-networks-distort-a-good-economy-and-batter-president-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-258528 bill Thu, 19 Oct 2006 20:28:37 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2006/10/19/how-networks-distort-a-good-economy-and-batter-president-bush/#comment-258528 When it comes to politics, the US press is about as honest as Parvda was in the old USSR. They favor the Dumb-o-crats because the press is every bit as amoral as the Dumb-o-crats When it comes to politics, the US press is about as honest as Parvda was in the old USSR. They favor the Dumb-o-crats because the press is every bit as amoral as the Dumb-o-crats

]]>