<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WaPo Headline: &#8220;Black Lawmakers in Line for Key Posts&#8221; And That Needed A Headline?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightvoices.com/2006/11/16/wapo-headline-black-lawmakers-in-line-for-key-posts-and-that-needed-a-headline/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightvoices.com/2006/11/16/wapo-headline-black-lawmakers-in-line-for-key-posts-and-that-needed-a-headline/</link>
	<description>in all matter of opinion, our adversaries are insane.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:05:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GOP Bloggers</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2006/11/16/wapo-headline-black-lawmakers-in-line-for-key-posts-and-that-needed-a-headline/comment-page-1/#comment-279314</link>
		<dc:creator>GOP Bloggers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 16:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2006/11/16/wapo-headline-black-lawmakers-in-line-for-key-posts-and-that-needed-a-headline/#comment-279314</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;We Told You So&lt;/strong&gt;

Jack Abramoff implicates Harry Reid... UPDATE: One out of five ain&#039;t bad... RightVoices looks at a WaPo story about black Democrats in line for chairmanships... and only one doesn&#039;t appear to be ethically challenged. UPDATE: And naturally, isn&#039;t a b...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>We Told You So</strong></p>
<p>Jack Abramoff implicates Harry Reid&#8230; UPDATE: One out of five ain&#8217;t bad&#8230; RightVoices looks at a WaPo story about black Democrats in line for chairmanships&#8230; and only one doesn&#8217;t appear to be ethically challenged. UPDATE: And naturally, isn&#8217;t a b&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
