<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: States Ring In The New Year With New Laws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightvoices.com/2006/12/31/states-ring-in-the-new-year-with-new-laws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightvoices.com/2006/12/31/states-ring-in-the-new-year-with-new-laws/</link>
	<description>in all matter of opinion, our adversaries are insane.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:16:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2006/12/31/states-ring-in-the-new-year-with-new-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-303047</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 18:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2006/12/31/states-ring-in-the-new-year-with-new-laws/#comment-303047</guid>
		<description>Drake is correct. The idiocy of what is going on in Kalifornia is staggering. They want to reduce CO2 emissions to combat GW. So what do they do? First enact regulations that cost millions to business and the economy yet reduce CO2 by only a very tiny fraction, and that is just a best estimate. Then they anounce a plan to build new power plants that will burn coal, which is the worst, dirtiest, most polluting technology of all. But they&#039;ll be located out of state so they can pollute someone else&#039;s air. And the Enviroidiots can feel all warm and fuzzy here.

And what about CO2 and GW? 42% of all the CO2 generated in kalifornia is from power plants. If they were really serious about reducing CO2, and didn&#039;t have their heads up their politically-correct asses, they would go 100% nuclear for electric power generation. They could eliminate 42% of all CO2 generation with that alone. Plus the cost of electricity in Kalifornia would drop by 2/3, benefitting business, the comsumer, and the economy in general. The elimination of the huge market for natural gas for power generation would bring the cost of NG down, benefitting businesses and consumers again.

But no, we&#039;re locked in the death grip of the politically-correct Jane Fona China Syndrome anti-nuclear hysteria idiots, and the Governator either doesn&#039;t understand this, or doesn&#039;t have the balls to do the right thing and promote what makes sense.

The anti-nuke crowd should be rounded up and sent to Al Qaeda for use in beheading videos, imo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drake is correct. The idiocy of what is going on in Kalifornia is staggering. They want to reduce CO2 emissions to combat GW. So what do they do? First enact regulations that cost millions to business and the economy yet reduce CO2 by only a very tiny fraction, and that is just a best estimate. Then they anounce a plan to build new power plants that will burn coal, which is the worst, dirtiest, most polluting technology of all. But they&#8217;ll be located out of state so they can pollute someone else&#8217;s air. And the Enviroidiots can feel all warm and fuzzy here.</p>
<p>And what about CO2 and GW? 42% of all the CO2 generated in kalifornia is from power plants. If they were really serious about reducing CO2, and didn&#8217;t have their heads up their politically-correct asses, they would go 100% nuclear for electric power generation. They could eliminate 42% of all CO2 generation with that alone. Plus the cost of electricity in Kalifornia would drop by 2/3, benefitting business, the comsumer, and the economy in general. The elimination of the huge market for natural gas for power generation would bring the cost of NG down, benefitting businesses and consumers again.</p>
<p>But no, we&#8217;re locked in the death grip of the politically-correct Jane Fona China Syndrome anti-nuclear hysteria idiots, and the Governator either doesn&#8217;t understand this, or doesn&#8217;t have the balls to do the right thing and promote what makes sense.</p>
<p>The anti-nuke crowd should be rounded up and sent to Al Qaeda for use in beheading videos, imo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peejz</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2006/12/31/states-ring-in-the-new-year-with-new-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-303033</link>
		<dc:creator>Peejz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 16:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2006/12/31/states-ring-in-the-new-year-with-new-laws/#comment-303033</guid>
		<description>:shock: Are you serious Drake? That is..well..so typical of government:lol:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://rightvoices.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_eek.gif' alt=':shock:' class='wp-smiley' />  Are you serious Drake? That is..well..so typical of government:lol:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drake</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2006/12/31/states-ring-in-the-new-year-with-new-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-303024</link>
		<dc:creator>Drake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 16:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2006/12/31/states-ring-in-the-new-year-with-new-laws/#comment-303024</guid>
		<description>&quot;California takes steps to reduce the power-plant pollution that is thought to contribute to global warming.&quot;

Ya, by moving the plants to neighboring states.  So the solution to global warming is simply out of sight out of mind?  Brilliant Arnold!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;California takes steps to reduce the power-plant pollution that is thought to contribute to global warming.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ya, by moving the plants to neighboring states.  So the solution to global warming is simply out of sight out of mind?  Brilliant Arnold!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
