Samuelson: How Baby Boomers Are Robbing Our Grandchildren

January 11, 2007 9:30 PM
Posted By:Pam
Filed in: Economy, National News

Robert Samuelson wrote this piece that was published in Newsweek.  The premise:

As someone born in late 1945, I say this to the 76 million or so subsequent baby boomers and particularly to Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, our generation’s leading politicians: shame on us. We are trying to rob our children and grandchildren, putting the country’s future at risk in the process. On one of the great issues of our time, the social and economic costs of our retirement, we have adopted a policy of selfish silence.

Nancy Pelosi promises to “build a better future for all of America’s children.” If she were serious, she would back cuts in Social Security and Medicare. President Bush calls “entitlement spending” the central budget problem. If he were serious, he, too, would propose cuts in Social Security and Medicare.

He backs up this statement with the following points:

  1. 65-and-over population will double by 2030 (to almost 72 million, or 20 percent of the total population)
  2. In 2005, Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid (the main programs for the elderly) cost $1.034 trillion, twice the amount of defense spending and more than two fifths of the total federal budget. These programs are projected to equal about three quarters of the budget by 2030, if it remains constant as a share of national income.
  3. The tax increases required by 2030 could hit 50 percent, if other spending is maintained as a share of national income. Or much of the rest of government (from defense to national parks) would have to be shut down or crippled. Or budget deficits would balloon to quadruple today’s level.
  4. Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid are pay-as-you-go programs. Present taxes pay present benefits. In 2005, 86 percent of Social Security payroll taxes went to pay current retiree benefits. True, excess taxes had created a “surplus” in the Social Security trust fund (it hasn’t been “plundered”) of $1.66 trillion in 2005; but that equaled less than four years’ worth of present benefits. More important, Medicare and Medicaid represent three quarters of the projected spending increase for retirees by 2030.

 

Please read the entire piece.  He balances his condemnation equally to the right and left, and there is plenty of blame to go around.  I do not agree that you cut benefits to those that make more.  There are cuts that can and should be made but that is not one of them..I would deny any illegal a benefit first and foremost as they committed a few crimes prior to even putting those funds in.  I agree with raising the age to 70, but he assumes that the person making more will save more and doesn’t take into account that we do have poor people that will do as little as possible in order to collect a benefit!

Hat tip to Noel Sheppard

Trackposted to Outside the Beltway, Perri Nelson’s Website, The Random Yak, Big Dog’s Weblog, Right Truth, basil’s blog, Stuck On Stupid, Conservative Cat, Pursuing Holiness, Rightwing Guy, 123 Beta, Diary of the Mad Pigeon, The HILL Chronicles, Woman Honor Thyself, stikNstein… has no mercy, The World According to Carl, Pirate’s Cove, The Pink Flamingo, Dumb Ox News, Dumb Ox News, High Desert Wanderer, and Gone Hollywood, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.   

 

Linkfest Haven, the Blogger's Oasis



Renaissance Blogger linked with Two Blog Posts That You Need To Read Now
Renaissance Blogger linked with Being a Christian and Supporting War
The HILL Chronicles linked with To Halal or not to Halal tis the question
Renaissance Blogger linked with I Need Something to Read This Weekend Open Trackback Party
Gone Hollywood linked with Sienna Miller Factory Girl Nude Sex Scenes
Outside The Beltway | OTB linked with Beltway Traffic Jam
Pursuing Holiness linked with Human Rights Watch On Credibility
High Desert Wanderer linked with Russell Klika - Online
Pursuing Holiness linked with Meet My Blog-Daughter
Phastidio.net linked with Strange legitimacy (Weekend Open Trackback)
High Desert Wanderer linked with Microsoft hits bottom, begins to dig
Faultline USA linked with UNCHECKED IMMIGRATION = NATIONAL BALKANIZATION: IS
Right Truth linked with Fast food, Halal food
The Amboy Times linked with Open Trackback Weekend
Gone Hollywood linked with Air Force Sergeant Michelle Manhart in Playboy
third world county linked with A Tale of Two Times/OTP
Gone Hollywood linked with Links To Hollywood #9
Conservative Cat linked with Babysitting a Civil War
Dumb Ox Daily News linked with Now Who's the NAZI? Dems Move to Squelch Right to



26 Responses to “Samuelson: How Baby Boomers Are Robbing Our Grandchildren”

  1. FrmrArtyOffcr
    January 11, 2007 - 11:12 PM on January 11th, 2007

    I simply want them to make taking a portion of your payments private to fund your own retirement an option. EVERY FEDERAL government employee has had that option since the mid 80s and those that took the option have a much rosier retirement picture than those that didn’t. Why is it okay for all of these @#$%^&* democratic congressmen and senators to have a PORTION of their Social Security taxes go into a privatized account but not for the rest of us? I realize that to the hard core libs that doesn’t seem the least bit hypocritical, but it sure does to the rest of us. For all of those congressmen who claim that privatized accounts will lead to smaller benefits for those who opt for them, I just have to ask if they are lying or stupid. Either they are lying about privatized accounts being bad, or they are stupid to have signed up for them. Seeing as history has shown that privatized accounts pay on average more than 6 times as much in return as the current system, the facts would lead me to believe that they are lying. It’s time to bite the bullet, fix the system and allow the option for privatized accounts while it’s still possible to retire young enough to enjoy it rather than work yourself into an early grave.

  2. Robert
    January 12, 2007 - 12:36 PM on January 12th, 2007

    I remember AARP lobbying against any privatization of SS, even a portion. Their big reason was that the money might go into risky investments, like the stock market.
    While at the very same time, AARP investment counselors were oitching to members to manage their portfolios in the very same investments!

    :lol:

  3. Angel
    January 12, 2007 - 02:02 PM on January 12th, 2007

    thanks for the link..so true..the economy..one more thing to worry bout eh?:razz:

  4. Zelda
    January 13, 2007 - 06:41 PM on January 13th, 2007

    I’ve squirreled up enough crack to last me for 100 years. I will never have to rely on Social Security for my crack buys.

    I recommend the rest of you do the same because you never know…

  5. San Francisco Liberal
    January 14, 2007 - 10:28 PM on January 14th, 2007

    I think we should raise taxes.

    …particularly on the rich. (!)

    Social Security? Raise the cap.

    We also need some form of Universal Health Care.

    How much are we spending in Iraq each week? 5 billion or so? I think we can find better uses for that money.

  6. TedintheShed
    January 14, 2007 - 10:36 PM on January 14th, 2007

    “I think we should raise taxes.”

    Of course you do. It is need to fund the social programs that you so desire to- those that when implemented too heavily, would collapse our economical growth and ensure future votes by expanding the entitlement state.

    I see no reason for “univesal health care”. That is addressing (incorrectly) the sypmtoms of the ailment, and not the cause.

Leave a Reply

Right Voices uses Gravatar to display your individual icon next to your name. Visit Gravatar.com to get your own!

Related Posts on this blog:
» A Retirement Quiz For Boomers
» Kristol:The boomers will be best remembered for their self-glorification.
» Our new threat is the senior-entitlement complex
» Billy Bob Thornton
» Lieberman Supports Partial Birth Abortions
» Mary Cheney Delivers A Healthy Baby Boy!
» Deceptive Acceptance Speech
» Hillary Proposes Government Paid $5,000 Baby Bond
» MARY CHENEY: ‘THIS IS A BABY… IT IS NOT A POLITICAL STATEMENT’…
» Perspective


<< Take Me Back Home!