<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NYT: Military Expands Domestic Surveillance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/13/nyt-military-expands-domestic-surveillance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/13/nyt-military-expands-domestic-surveillance/</link>
	<description>in all matter of opinion, our adversaries are insane.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:20:40 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peejz</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/13/nyt-military-expands-domestic-surveillance/comment-page-1/#comment-308043</link>
		<dc:creator>Peejz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 01:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/13/nyt-military-expands-domestic-surveillance/#comment-308043</guid>
		<description>5-&lt;em&gt;I understand FISA. Does this &quot;Right to&quot;Financial Privacy Act of 1978 have independent oversight? If not, why not? Why is the new right wing so ignorant about governmental abuses?&lt;/em&gt;  I guess you just overlooked or are too old to pay attention to the portion of the article that clearly states: &lt;strong&gt;Congressional officials said members of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees had been briefed on the use of the letters by the military and the C.I.A.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5-<em>I understand FISA. Does this &#8220;Right to&#8221;Financial Privacy Act of 1978 have independent oversight? If not, why not? Why is the new right wing so ignorant about governmental abuses?</em>  I guess you just overlooked or are too old to pay attention to the portion of the article that clearly states: <strong>Congressional officials said members of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees had been briefed on the use of the letters by the military and the C.I.A.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sky-Ho</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/13/nyt-military-expands-domestic-surveillance/comment-page-1/#comment-308027</link>
		<dc:creator>Sky-Ho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 23:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/13/nyt-military-expands-domestic-surveillance/#comment-308027</guid>
		<description>Liberals in a snit?

Well, count me, an Eisenhower Republican, as greatly disturbed over this issue.  I also believe Ben Franklins comment on giving up liberty for &quot;security&quot;.

I understand FISA.  Does this &quot;Right to&quot; Financial Privacy Act of 1978 have independent oversight?  If not, why not?  Why is the new right wing so ignorant about governmental abuses?

I see so many parallels with &quot;socialist party&quot; in Germany in the &#039;30s and the lately styled &quot;Republican party&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberals in a snit?</p>
<p>Well, count me, an Eisenhower Republican, as greatly disturbed over this issue.  I also believe Ben Franklins comment on giving up liberty for &#8220;security&#8221;.</p>
<p>I understand FISA.  Does this &#8220;Right to&#8221; Financial Privacy Act of 1978 have independent oversight?  If not, why not?  Why is the new right wing so ignorant about governmental abuses?</p>
<p>I see so many parallels with &#8220;socialist party&#8221; in Germany in the &#8217;30s and the lately styled &#8220;Republican party&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snowy egret</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/13/nyt-military-expands-domestic-surveillance/comment-page-1/#comment-308009</link>
		<dc:creator>snowy egret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 22:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/13/nyt-military-expands-domestic-surveillance/#comment-308009</guid>
		<description>S.F Lib must have brains walnut sized becuase they spend too much time sitting in the hills lotus style whole going OOOMMM OOOMMM OOOMMM or howling like a wolf when the full moon rises:razz:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>S.F Lib must have brains walnut sized becuase they spend too much time sitting in the hills lotus style whole going OOOMMM OOOMMM OOOMMM or howling like a wolf when the full moon rises:razz:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TedintheShed</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/13/nyt-military-expands-domestic-surveillance/comment-page-1/#comment-307989</link>
		<dc:creator>TedintheShed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 21:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/13/nyt-military-expands-domestic-surveillance/#comment-307989</guid>
		<description>Re 1:

If you read the article, you may find this intersint:

&lt;em&gt;&quot;Military officials say the Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1978, which establishes procedures for government access to sensitive banking data, first authorized them to issue national security letters.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

Bush was not President in 1978. Care to contemplate who was?

I didn&#039;t think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re 1:</p>
<p>If you read the article, you may find this intersint:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Military officials say the Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1978, which establishes procedures for government access to sensitive banking data, first authorized them to issue national security letters.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Bush was not President in 1978. Care to contemplate who was?</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Super Lib</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/13/nyt-military-expands-domestic-surveillance/comment-page-1/#comment-307970</link>
		<dc:creator>Super Lib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 20:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/13/nyt-military-expands-domestic-surveillance/#comment-307970</guid>
		<description>Only a Liberal, anti-war, hate-America President and Administration can succeed! I&#039;d say bring back our most respected icon, Jimmy Carter, but frankly he&#039;s a little too old. 

But the point is well taken, San Francisco Liberal. And you are exactly right: the voters recently mandated Liberalism, Socialism, and Progressivism. It is the will of the people!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only a Liberal, anti-war, hate-America President and Administration can succeed! I&#8217;d say bring back our most respected icon, Jimmy Carter, but frankly he&#8217;s a little too old. </p>
<p>But the point is well taken, San Francisco Liberal. And you are exactly right: the voters recently mandated Liberalism, Socialism, and Progressivism. It is the will of the people!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: San Francisco Liberal</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/13/nyt-military-expands-domestic-surveillance/comment-page-1/#comment-307962</link>
		<dc:creator>San Francisco Liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/13/nyt-military-expands-domestic-surveillance/#comment-307962</guid>
		<description>How long, 2009?

We need a new president, executive branch.

This one BLOWS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How long, 2009?</p>
<p>We need a new president, executive branch.</p>
<p>This one BLOWS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mahablog &#187; The Pentagon Goes Fishin&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/13/nyt-military-expands-domestic-surveillance/comment-page-1/#comment-307892</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mahablog &#187; The Pentagon Goes Fishin&#8217;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 14:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/13/nyt-military-expands-domestic-surveillance/#comment-307892</guid>
		<description>[...] Indeed, as near as I can tell from Technorati and Memeorandum, the only rightie blogger commenting on this story as of yet is this one, who says what the Pentagon is doing is &#8220;all perfectly legal,&#8221; and adds, &#8220;As usual, the left is in a snit! Gee, big surprise huh?&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Indeed, as near as I can tell from Technorati and Memeorandum, the only rightie blogger commenting on this story as of yet is this one, who says what the Pentagon is doing is &#8220;all perfectly legal,&#8221; and adds, &#8220;As usual, the left is in a snit! Gee, big surprise huh?&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
