<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Senators-in-Chief? Congress has no Constitutional power to micromanage a war.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/25/senators-in-chief-congress-has-no-constitutional-power-to-micromanage-a-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/25/senators-in-chief-congress-has-no-constitutional-power-to-micromanage-a-war/</link>
	<description>in all matter of opinion, our adversaries are insane.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:16:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matthias Roggenbuck</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/25/senators-in-chief-congress-has-no-constitutional-power-to-micromanage-a-war/comment-page-1/#comment-313461</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthias Roggenbuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/25/senators-in-chief-congress-has-no-constitutional-power-to-micromanage-a-war/#comment-313461</guid>
		<description>28-
Man, how I hate those Monday mornings without having sth. to laugh. I owe &lt;em&gt;you&lt;/em&gt; one for &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt;.. :mrgreen:

So, now it is up to the army to determine the politics of a country and not the people- interesting. I guess Cpt Galt would be very welcome in countries like Cuba or North Corea...

But serious, Article IV, Section 4:
&quot;The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence.&quot;

So, when did the Iraq invade the US- did I miss something?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>28-<br />
Man, how I hate those Monday mornings without having sth. to laugh. I owe <em>you</em> one for <em>that</em>.. <img src='http://rightvoices.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif' alt=':mrgreen:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>So, now it is up to the army to determine the politics of a country and not the people- interesting. I guess Cpt Galt would be very welcome in countries like Cuba or North Corea&#8230;</p>
<p>But serious, Article IV, Section 4:<br />
&#8220;The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, when did the Iraq invade the US- did I miss something?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrmrArtyOffcr</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/25/senators-in-chief-congress-has-no-constitutional-power-to-micromanage-a-war/comment-page-1/#comment-313376</link>
		<dc:creator>FrmrArtyOffcr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 06:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/25/senators-in-chief-congress-has-no-constitutional-power-to-micromanage-a-war/#comment-313376</guid>
		<description>Wrong again Matthias. The members of the US Military swear an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic. You&#039;re entire comment was nonsense. You don&#039;t know what you are talking about.

You have insulted Cpt Gault and you owe him an apology. You are the one who is as usual incorrect and showing your lack of knowledge. Last I checked, Clausewitz and Sun Tzu were on the list of recommended reading for Army officers. I personally opted for &quot;A Bridge Too Far&quot; for the report I had to write. Operation Market Garden was a true example of a military operation gone awry from the very beginning. It was in fact a military operation that was wholly based on bad intelligence. However that intelligence failed to indicate exactly how strong a threat was present versus the current situation wherein intelligence indicated a stronger one than existed. I would still rather destroy a city to prevent nuclear or chemical weapons from falling into the hands of terrorists and be wrong than to not do so and have the terrorists end up with them due to my inaction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrong again Matthias. The members of the US Military swear an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic. You&#8217;re entire comment was nonsense. You don&#8217;t know what you are talking about.</p>
<p>You have insulted Cpt Gault and you owe him an apology. You are the one who is as usual incorrect and showing your lack of knowledge. Last I checked, Clausewitz and Sun Tzu were on the list of recommended reading for Army officers. I personally opted for &#8220;A Bridge Too Far&#8221; for the report I had to write. Operation Market Garden was a true example of a military operation gone awry from the very beginning. It was in fact a military operation that was wholly based on bad intelligence. However that intelligence failed to indicate exactly how strong a threat was present versus the current situation wherein intelligence indicated a stronger one than existed. I would still rather destroy a city to prevent nuclear or chemical weapons from falling into the hands of terrorists and be wrong than to not do so and have the terrorists end up with them due to my inaction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AKD</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/25/senators-in-chief-congress-has-no-constitutional-power-to-micromanage-a-war/comment-page-1/#comment-312908</link>
		<dc:creator>AKD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 22:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/25/senators-in-chief-congress-has-no-constitutional-power-to-micromanage-a-war/#comment-312908</guid>
		<description>My favorite quote: &lt;em&gt;Air Force Staff Sgt. Tassi McKee, 26, an intelligence specialist at Fort Meade, Md., said she joined the Air Force because of patriotism, travel and money for college. &quot;After we went to Iraq, I began to see through the lies,&quot; she said.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite quote: <em>Air Force Staff Sgt. Tassi McKee, 26, an intelligence specialist at Fort Meade, Md., said she joined the Air Force because of patriotism, travel and money for college. &#8220;After we went to Iraq, I began to see through the lies,&#8221; she said.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AKD</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/25/senators-in-chief-congress-has-no-constitutional-power-to-micromanage-a-war/comment-page-1/#comment-312907</link>
		<dc:creator>AKD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 22:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/25/senators-in-chief-congress-has-no-constitutional-power-to-micromanage-a-war/#comment-312907</guid>
		<description>The American people are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/01/27/ap3368500.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;speaking&lt;/a&gt;.  Will the current administration listen??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The American people are <a href="http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/01/27/ap3368500.html" rel="nofollow">speaking</a>.  Will the current administration listen??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peejz</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/25/senators-in-chief-congress-has-no-constitutional-power-to-micromanage-a-war/comment-page-1/#comment-312788</link>
		<dc:creator>Peejz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 14:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/25/senators-in-chief-congress-has-no-constitutional-power-to-micromanage-a-war/#comment-312788</guid>
		<description>23- Thank god you aren&#039;t in the military any longer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>23- Thank god you aren&#8217;t in the military any longer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthias Roggenbuck</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/25/senators-in-chief-congress-has-no-constitutional-power-to-micromanage-a-war/comment-page-1/#comment-312738</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthias Roggenbuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 11:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/25/senators-in-chief-congress-has-no-constitutional-power-to-micromanage-a-war/#comment-312738</guid>
		<description>21-
Robert, please apologize my direct expression, but saying &quot;The only way to fight a war is to win!&quot; sounds like the kind of propaganda the nobody on this site needs, because the one side shares your view anyway and the other side won&#039;t be impressed by such unsubstantial statements.
My advice, read/learn from people like Clausewitz or Sun Tsu who made useful statements like &quot;avoid a battle if you don&#039;t expect to win it&quot;, etc.



20-
John, it is quite frightening that somebody with your level of education/knowledge has be become a Captain, has the command over (I would guess) one hundred men and perhaps equipment for around a two-digit million dollars...
A constitution is the base for the law. It is (together with all other laws) given/maintained by your elected government. Your goverment is elected by the citizens of your country. And you serve the decision that have been made by your government, who represent the will of the citizens of your country.

John: You serve and protect your fellow countrymen- not an ancient piece of paper! This has got nothing to do with left or right- this has to do with democracy. Look it up in wikipedia. It&#039;s greek for &quot;rule by the people&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>21-<br />
Robert, please apologize my direct expression, but saying &#8220;The only way to fight a war is to win!&#8221; sounds like the kind of propaganda the nobody on this site needs, because the one side shares your view anyway and the other side won&#8217;t be impressed by such unsubstantial statements.<br />
My advice, read/learn from people like Clausewitz or Sun Tsu who made useful statements like &#8220;avoid a battle if you don&#8217;t expect to win it&#8221;, etc.</p>
<p>20-<br />
John, it is quite frightening that somebody with your level of education/knowledge has be become a Captain, has the command over (I would guess) one hundred men and perhaps equipment for around a two-digit million dollars&#8230;<br />
A constitution is the base for the law. It is (together with all other laws) given/maintained by your elected government. Your goverment is elected by the citizens of your country. And you serve the decision that have been made by your government, who represent the will of the citizens of your country.</p>
<p>John: You serve and protect your fellow countrymen- not an ancient piece of paper! This has got nothing to do with left or right- this has to do with democracy. Look it up in wikipedia. It&#8217;s greek for &#8220;rule by the people&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stageleft</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/25/senators-in-chief-congress-has-no-constitutional-power-to-micromanage-a-war/comment-page-1/#comment-312592</link>
		<dc:creator>stageleft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 03:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/25/senators-in-chief-congress-has-no-constitutional-power-to-micromanage-a-war/#comment-312592</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;So we need to withdraw and appologise? Oh please..&lt;/em&gt;

Actually yeah. That is, I think, the appropriate response for something that the US government has balled up as badly as it has.

&lt;em&gt;So based on what you said, the plan is surrender..just as we have been saying since day one..&lt;/em&gt;

Call it what you will, I see it as common sense. Once the horse is dead beating it with more and bigger sticks will not force it to get up and run again.

&lt;em&gt;The Nazis is a valid arguement, but you would need to be intelligent enough to be able to see it. &lt;/em&gt;

Sorry dude, any argument that begins with &lt;em&gt;&quot;If the left had it&#039;s way we&#039;d all be speaking German or Japanese&quot;&lt;/em&gt; is, quite frankly, not valid.

You don&#039;t seem to have given any sort of thought to what happens if the Iraqi government does not, or is not able to, look after things to the satisfaction of the Bush administration before their patience runs out, what happens then?

-- or is that &lt;em&gt;we don&#039;t have unending patience&lt;/em&gt; line just something he talks about to keep the electorate happy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>So we need to withdraw and appologise? Oh please..</em></p>
<p>Actually yeah. That is, I think, the appropriate response for something that the US government has balled up as badly as it has.</p>
<p><em>So based on what you said, the plan is surrender..just as we have been saying since day one..</em></p>
<p>Call it what you will, I see it as common sense. Once the horse is dead beating it with more and bigger sticks will not force it to get up and run again.</p>
<p><em>The Nazis is a valid arguement, but you would need to be intelligent enough to be able to see it. </em></p>
<p>Sorry dude, any argument that begins with <em>&#8220;If the left had it&#8217;s way we&#8217;d all be speaking German or Japanese&#8221;</em> is, quite frankly, not valid.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t seem to have given any sort of thought to what happens if the Iraqi government does not, or is not able to, look after things to the satisfaction of the Bush administration before their patience runs out, what happens then?</p>
<p>&#8211; or is that <em>we don&#8217;t have unending patience</em> line just something he talks about to keep the electorate happy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnGalt</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/25/senators-in-chief-congress-has-no-constitutional-power-to-micromanage-a-war/comment-page-1/#comment-312493</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnGalt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 22:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/25/senators-in-chief-congress-has-no-constitutional-power-to-micromanage-a-war/#comment-312493</guid>
		<description>Peejz,  I am doing fine.  I for one have lost much over the course of this war.  I still do my duty and call those who derail the effort for political gain want us to loose for selfish reasons and they are traitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peejz,  I am doing fine.  I for one have lost much over the course of this war.  I still do my duty and call those who derail the effort for political gain want us to loose for selfish reasons and they are traitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/25/senators-in-chief-congress-has-no-constitutional-power-to-micromanage-a-war/comment-page-1/#comment-312484</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 21:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/25/senators-in-chief-congress-has-no-constitutional-power-to-micromanage-a-war/#comment-312484</guid>
		<description>18 what is stupid about it? The only &quot;stupid&quot; is those who seem to have forgotten that simple, logical truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>18 what is stupid about it? The only &#8220;stupid&#8221; is those who seem to have forgotten that simple, logical truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnGalt</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/25/senators-in-chief-congress-has-no-constitutional-power-to-micromanage-a-war/comment-page-1/#comment-312479</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnGalt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/01/25/senators-in-chief-congress-has-no-constitutional-power-to-micromanage-a-war/#comment-312479</guid>
		<description>The Constitution of the United States.  Peddle your recycled communism with someone else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Constitution of the United States.  Peddle your recycled communism with someone else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
