Click hear to get an idea of what this is about.

 

  Click on Image to watch the video

42 Responses to “San Francisco “anti-militarism” Hits a New low”

1. San Francisco Liberal
   February 15, 2007 - 09:51 PM on February 15th, 2007

   I love this City.

2. Peejz
   February 15, 2007 - 10:30 PM on February 15th, 2007

   I think I would be a bit worried about teaching these kids the basics. These scores are pitiful!

   Out of 24 high schools, 10 scored at or above the state average…14 didn’t.

3. Rocky Lore
   February 15, 2007 - 10:43 PM on February 15th, 2007

   San Francisco hates the American military, but they love the freedoms that were only won thanks to the American military.

4. Down with Libbies
   February 16, 2007 - 01:30 PM on February 16th, 2007

   Hmmmmm San Fransisco hates the military, yet 99% of the boys in town are Rear Admirals. Go figure.

5. snowy egret
   February 16, 2007 - 05:50 PM on February 16th, 2007

   I will never ever visit that trash dump on the bay its full of the nations most vile life forms that gose by the name of HUMAN BEINGS we should just boycott all having to do with HANOI ON THE BAY including RICE A RONIE:mad:

6. BonBon
   February 17, 2007 - 08:19 AM on February 17th, 2007

   1. Hey San Fran, next time your city has an earthquake don’t call the National Guard….they are not allowed. Just curios though. What is your plan?

7. Robert
   February 17, 2007 - 10:33 AM on February 17th, 2007

   Rocky is 100% right. The reason that San Francisco can exist, with their freedom of speech and lifestyle, is because of the service and sacrifices of the Military they so loathe.

   Anti-military degenerates: we loathe you too.

8. Down with Libbies
   February 17, 2007 - 12:41 PM on February 17th, 2007

   Bonbon

   Earthquake hits all the Frisco boys have to do is flutter thiers wings to evacuate. No maybe not, all they got in Frisco is leftwings.

9. Eben
   February 17, 2007 - 04:29 PM on February 17th, 2007

   #8

   Earthquake hits all the Frisco boys have to do is flutter thiers wings to evacuate.

   Down with Libbies?

   Do you mean that in that same sense is all you boys have to do is pass gas good and loud by lifting a cheek in order to escape your earthquakes?

   I prefer the flying method. It’s less offensive.:lol:

   Yes, I thought that’s what you meant.

10. Eben
    February 17, 2007 - 04:31 PM on February 17th, 2007

    Robert

    #7 Anti-military degenerates: we loathe you too.

    Frightened, self-questioning, warmongering bigots? We loathe you too.

    Make no mistake.:smile:

11. AKD
    February 17, 2007 - 05:06 PM on February 17th, 2007

    Wow, as soon as SF comes up all the hate-filled, homophobic, right wing bigots show their true colors. I’m shocked.

12. Robert
    February 17, 2007 - 07:00 PM on February 17th, 2007

    How’s the Church of Global Warming Missionary work coming, AKD? Get any new converts lately?

13. Peejz
    February 17, 2007 - 08:14 PM on February 17th, 2007

    11- Actually, we aren’t homophobic, but Eben, a homosexual, is a bigot.

14. snowy egret
    February 17, 2007 - 10:47 PM on February 17th, 2007

    San Fran Liberal has the brain the size of a walnut and so dose anyone who thinks this dump hear is a good place to live:mad:

15. TedintheShed
    February 17, 2007 - 10:59 PM on February 17th, 2007

    It is their city- if they want to be anti-military they have the right to be anti-military.

    It’s the same as flag burning- if someone wants to burn a flag it is their right. I may not agree with it, but it IS their right.

16. AKD
    February 18, 2007 - 02:33 AM on February 18th, 2007

    13. we aren’t homophobic

    So, the “degenerate” (post 7) “rear admiral” (post 4) “Frisco boys” should “flutter their wings” (post next time there’s an earthquake.

    Peejz, honey, if you’re going to lie so blatantly, maybe you should doctor the posts before doing so.

17. AKD
    February 18, 2007 - 02:36 AM on February 18th, 2007

    Hmmmm…. cool emoticon should be a reference to post eight.

18. Peejz
    February 18, 2007 - 08:51 AM on February 18th, 2007

    Ted, this is not on par with flag burning. This is a public school receiving public funds.

19. TedintheShed
    February 18, 2007 - 09:00 AM on February 18th, 2007

    “Ted, this is not on par with flag burning. This is a public school receiving public funds.”.

    I wasn’t referring to the school itself, but San Fransisco in general. So, should have quoted post 3 to which I was referring. So yes it it.

    However if they want to limit funding to area tax payers and fore go federal funding for their schools, then it’s still fine by me. But that opens up a can of worms that I don’t think liberals would like to see- such as religion taught in public school and the Ten Commandments being posted at local court houses.

20. Eben
    February 18, 2007 - 09:10 AM on February 18th, 2007

    #11?

    AKD, and the others?

    All I can tell you fellas and gals is that stereotypes are not the sole jurisdiciton of people who call themselves “Conservatives”. Those posters I mentioned and referenced in my previous in these comments started with the negative “wings” and flying references so I just thought I’d give you back this homosexual’s equally able perspective on you guys.

    Is it productive? Course not. But you have your take we have ours. See how it works? We can “cop a take” on how you appear visually and behaviorally on us.

    Does it serve a purpose? I hope it’s (if nothing else) instructive that generalizations about entire groups of people only make the accusor look as limited in intellect and understanding as he is.

21. Eben
    February 18, 2007 - 09:12 AM on February 18th, 2007

    woooooops! Sorry guys. The bolded last piece in my last was unintentional.

    

22. Peejz
    February 18, 2007 - 09:13 AM on February 18th, 2007

    19- gotcha

23. Eben
    February 18, 2007 - 09:15 AM on February 18th, 2007

    #13 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO peejz!!

    So I’m a bigot huh?

    Do tell. I’m curious.. tell me how luv.

24. Peejz
    February 18, 2007 - 09:29 AM on February 18th, 2007

    23- do you think that your homosexuality excludes you from being able to be bigoted? That is kinda like saying blacks can’t be racists.

25. Eben
    February 18, 2007 - 09:41 AM on February 18th, 2007

    re #24

    Now now. Don’t make absurd assumptions. But you don’t support your claim in post #13.

    I’m a clever lad. Of course I don’t think that homosexuals are excluded from biases generally.

    But I also don’t think that since I’m (as you’ve chosen to name me) ‘a homosexual’ I have any reason to be held to a higher standard than say our “Snowy Egret” here when it comes to bashing entire sectors of society, eh what?

    Guess if he can spew (along we choice other posters :roll .. well I can have my tongue-in-cheek generalizations.:grin:

    You assume to much with your ‘like saying black can’t be racists’ statement. In my own experience with black people I find (personally) that the males among them tend to be more threatened by my homosexuality than their white counterparts – whatever that indicates.

    You’ve been trying to “have at me” about this homosexuality topic for some time now. I’ll give it round or two if you want. But I’ll only be directing my commentary to you since goodness knows all the other “wing” commentary posters will be weighing in.

    It’s up to you if you have the time. I have a free Sunday here.

    **rolls up sleeves**

26. Eben
    February 18, 2007 - 09:42 AM on February 18th, 2007

    woooooooooops! please read “too” much.

    I despise poor grammar!

27. Peejz
    February 18, 2007 - 09:46 AM on February 18th, 2007

    25- your words support my claim. In the stats section, you can pull up your comments. Feel free to read through them. And you are the only one that wants to have at anyone about your homosexuality.

28. Eben
    February 18, 2007 - 10:12 AM on February 18th, 2007

    27-

    You ‘pull them up’. You’re the one name-calling.

    And your endless harping on homosexuality per se at this blog would indicate that this comment;

    And you are the only one that wants to have at anyone about your homosexuality. is utter horseshit utterly reinforced by your blatant silence when your posters write things like what “Down with Libbies” said in post #8.

29. Peejz
    February 18, 2007 - 11:00 AM on February 18th, 2007

    endless harping on homosexuality That endless harping is talking about a relevant piece of today’s culture. We should talk about it, just as we talk about any other subject. Rulings in MI are important to the discussion, just as the hypocrisy of the the homosexuals that claim to be hurt by bigoted remarks.

    As I told you before, I won’t edit Down With Libbies, any more than I would edit you. You seem to think you are the only one that is allowed to throw out the bigoted comments. DWL owns those words, just as you own yours.

30. Eben
    February 18, 2007 - 12:24 PM on February 18th, 2007

    29-

    Oh before it was just me.. now it’s ‘relevant piece of today’s culture’. Sheesh- keep me up to speed will ya?

    I don’t exect you luv to ‘edit’ anyone. But your lack of commentary when those with obvious inherent biases versus your landing on those of us who are perceived as liberals is pretty obvious even from a detached standpoint.

    And you’ve yet to show me where [I] seem to think [am] the only one that (sic) is allowed to throw out the bigoted comments. That’s your inference. Never has it been my implication.

    Where once have a displayed a bigotry of any discription with perhaps the sole exception of a bigoty (to which I’ll readily admit) towards bigots themselves.

31. Peejz
    February 18, 2007 - 01:41 PM on February 18th, 2007

    30-Oh before it was just me.. now it’s ‘relevant piece of today’s culture’ It never was about you, it was about “homosexuals” and you made it about you.

    Did DWL come here to discuss anything or did they come here to post an inflamatory comment? It is the latter of the 2 and I’m not getting involved with them.

    I have told you to go read your comments, and you will find them. Are you afraid to go re-read what you wrote?

32. Eben
    February 18, 2007 - 03:04 PM on February 18th, 2007

    Of course I’m not ‘afraid to read my comments’ but you’re the first one to hold people accountable when they make an ascertion. I’m holding you to your own standard since you made the accusation.

    You called me a bigot now prove it.

    and as far as me ‘making it about me’ as far as the homosexuality comment is concern peejz I’ll refer you to post number 13 on this thread where )and I quote you wrote but Eben is a homosexual, and a bigot.

    That ought to be clear enough for you to wrap your brain around.

    You made it about me.

    Now prove it (the bigot part that is) or keep still.

33. Peejz
    February 18, 2007 - 04:59 PM on February 18th, 2007

    13 was made in reference to your #10. You made it about you. As I said, take the time to read any number of your posts, your bigotry is right there in front of you..

34. Eben
    February 18, 2007 - 06:14 PM on February 18th, 2007

    You’ve called me a bigot

    Examples my love, examples. Or button it.:wink:

    I’m not doing your homework for you.

35. Peejz
    February 18, 2007 - 06:37 PM on February 18th, 2007

    I called you a bigot because you are a bigot. I’ll not be buttoning anything.

36. AKD
    February 19, 2007 - 02:03 AM on February 19th, 2007

    I called you a bigot because you are a bigot

    Is this how you respond to the request for “examples?”

37. Robert
    February 19, 2007 - 03:59 AM on February 19th, 2007

    Another Koolaid Drinker (AKD) jumps into the argument; no doubt feeling he owes it to Eben for the compliment paid in another topic. Or maybe it was because Eben was about the only one who weighed in on AKD’s side in the Global Warming argument.

    Do you suppose AKD actually converted Eben to the Church of Global Warming? Or was AKD just preaching to choir member Eben?

    It really does seem that once someone has crossed over to the Left and into the world of mental illness, almost anything is possible.

38. AKD
    February 19, 2007 - 05:16 AM on February 19th, 2007

    Wow, Robert, what a great post. Your mind is working, as always. With careful critics of the left like you on its side, it’s no wonder the right in this country has never looked stronger.

39. Trauer
    February 19, 2007 - 06:49 AM on February 19th, 2007

    Robert never argues; he just sits on the sidelines and claps his hands. He belongs in the same group as snow egret and pcd: cheer for republicans, boo the democrats, keep your mind safely closed while you do it. He’s funny.

40. Eben
    February 19, 2007 - 08:45 PM on February 19th, 2007

    #33..

    “Whose on third”?:roll:

41. Eben
    February 19, 2007 - 08:46 PM on February 19th, 2007

    #36

    Is this how you respond to the request for “examples?”

    Apparently.

    Two sets of rules I’d wager. No surprise.

42. Eben
    February 19, 2007 - 08:47 PM on February 19th, 2007

    #35I called you a bigot because you are a bigot. I’ll not be buttoning anything.

    OH YEAH??

    NO! You are! SO there!!!:evil:

Leave a Reply

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website

Right Voices uses Gravatar to display individual comment author icons. If you'd like your own icon next to your name, then go to Gravatar.com and sign up - it's easy!

more »

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail