Comments on: Former ACLU Chapter President Arrested for Child Pornography

By: Roy

Roy — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 07:42:07 +0000

I have read some disturbing studies that law enforcement actually puts child porn on the internet in order to entrap people searching for it. Does anyone have any evidence of this?

By: FrmrArtyOffcr

FrmrArtyOffcr — Wed, 28 Feb 2007 05:51:15 +0000

A degenerate pervert is a degenerate pervert regardless of political or religious affiliation. What makes this pervert’s arrest and affiliation to the ACLU important is the continuing efforts of the ACLU to actually legalize this form of degenerate behavior by claiming that it is a form of free expression.

By: snowy egret

snowy egret — Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:06:40 +0000

SFL is just another liberal wacko who thinks JIMMY CARTER and BILL CLINTON were americas best presidents in its history what dweeb:razz:

By: PCD

PCD — Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:39:30 +0000

SFL, is just another of hack propagandist sent out by the drunk that is chairman of the California Democrat party. The bast quote I have about Art Torres is from within his own family, “Art made more sense when he was drinking. Art is making more money as Chair of the CA Democrats than he ever did doing anything else.”

By: TedintheShed

TedintheShed — Mon, 26 Feb 2007 02:57:37 +0000

“This sick man getting busted has nothing to do with the ACLU…”

Incorrect, as I’ve pointed out the ACLU’s position before. If they would have won the case in 1982, then this man would not have “gotten busted” to begin with.

Can’t you see how your position screams utter hypocrisy? This isn’t about political factions as you and many other folks on this BBS tend to slight things. This is about an organization that at one time was a noble institution, but now takes radical positions and routinely attempted to take rights away from America citizens.

In that manner, the ACLU is no better than the KKK, the Republicans or the Democrats.

By: Peejz

Peejz — Mon, 26 Feb 2007 02:47:40 +0000

Where did it say in the article that Rust-Tierney was a Democrat? I know Republicans that are members of the ACLU…you made this about political parties when I posted a topic on an ACLU attorney that was busted on child porn charges…

By: San Francisco Liberal

San Francisco Liberal — Mon, 26 Feb 2007 01:55:37 +0000

Except, I’m not the one who “started this whole thing” in the first place…you’re the one (along with other far-right-extremist sites) who posted this garbage.

Clearly these weak kinds of attacks are ineffective because they can too easily swing both ways…like me bringing up Republican pervert Mark Foley.

This sick man getting busted has nothing to do with the ACLU, just as Rep. Foley and the like getting busted had nothing to do with the Republican party.

Get it?

Cheap partisan trick.

lame.

By: TedintheShed

TedintheShed — Mon, 26 Feb 2007 01:44:07 +0000

“How does the Union have anything to do with this man being a pedophile?”.
And here is where we get into the crux of the matter, isn’t it?
Acoording to the ACLU, this man would not be a pedophile. It should be perfectly within his Constitutional rights to have child pornography on his computer, just against the law to create it. In 1982, the ACLU took this position when oppposing New York v. Ferber.
The ACLU would support this man, whom you yourself has deemed a “pedophile”.

By: Peejz

Peejz — Mon, 26 Feb 2007 00:35:18 +0000

19- Said SF:

This pervert and the ACLU. Pervert Rep. Mark Foley and the Republican Party.

Guilt by association.

It always works on the weak minded.

Which is hysterical that you would say it considering that you are the one that started this whole thing back up in #2 when you said:

In the interest of partisianship, there are plenty of folks on the “Right”who have been busted looking at this garbage, too.
So:

By: San Francisco Liberal

San Francisco Liberal — Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:23:40 +0000

doesn’t work on me.