Comments on: BREAKING: SCOTUS UPHOLDS BAN ON PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTION, GINSBURG OUTRAGED

By: Sarai

Sarai — Sat, 30 Jun 2007 15:52:49 +0000

Every single person that aborts is wrong May be if the women dont open there legs then they dont have to abort I think its so dum.. Ima have my kids no matter even If My baby daddy dont want them or my mother .

from sarai

By: Observer.

Observer. — Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:12:19 +0000

Robert.

You forget, the abortion procedure lovers don’t have a brain.

By: Robert

Robert — Fri, 20 Apr 2007 07:15:06 +0000

I’d like to see a dozen or so supporters of this procedure to kill viable babies laid face down on a table. Then someone can come up behind them and shove a pointed scissors into their brain.
Then immediately ask them how they liked it!

By: FrmrArtyOffcr

FrmrArtyOffcr — Fri, 20 Apr 2007 04:06:50 +0000

One small thought for those screaming about this decision. If it doesn’t endanger the woman’s health for her to deliver a dead fetus, exactly how will it endanger her health to deliver a live baby? It’s not like the baby is going to be any larger than the fetus. If they are going to pull it out anyway, why not save the trouble of suctioning out the brain by just delivering it? There are plenty of couples out there looking to adopt new borns. Exactly how much worse for the baby will adoption be than abortion? Just a pragmatic thought. If she’s not going to be able to deliver normally, why not simply perform a c section? The only reason why to use this procedure is for the convenience of the mother.

By: Robert

Robert — Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:22:31 +0000

It is very difficult for me to even look at the graphics in this thread (above). Yea, I know, I am responding emotionally, but it just does.

By: Robert

Robert — Thu, 19 Apr 2007 20:46:54 +0000

SFL once again you are apparently unable to distinguish the argument here. We are talking about so-called partial-birth abortion, which includes the intentional murder of a viable baby just because the mother decides so.

We are not taking about abortion in general.

By: TedintheShed

TedintheShed — Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:53:16 +0000

“The Right won’t have the presidency or congress for quite some time, come 2008.”

I’ll take that bet. I see Guiliani as the next President. If the Dem Congress continues to screw up as they have been in the short time period that they’ve had it, they’ll loose congress in 2010.

By: Rightwing Redhead

Rightwing Redhead — Thu, 19 Apr 2007 02:28:24 +0000

Yea San Fran Lib, you are indeed the winners when it comes to killing babies, taking away land from the Boy Scouts and forbidding the flag from being flown on Fire Engines a week after 9-11 and taking God out of the Pledge of Allegiance. You should be proud of your useless accomplishments toward your war on democracy and journey to socialism. Truely pathetic.

By: San Francisco Liberal

San Francisco Liberal — Thu, 19 Apr 2007 02:03:17 +0000

While this is still a “kick in the nuts” to the Pro-Choice crowd, this ruling really doesn’t effect the 90+% of abortions that take place in the first 12 weeks.

Abortion in America isn’t going anywhere…and Bush/The Right have less than 2 years to make any signifigant legal changes, and even that isn’t very likely to occur, much more than something like this.

The Right won’t have the presidency or congress for quite some time, come 2008.

This is a bump in the road for the reproductive rights movement, but nothing more.

Savor the taste of victory, my righty friends…it’s not going to last long for your team. (!)

By: Toasted Tofu

Toasted Tofu — Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:44:07 +0000

Okay,

Looking for ’search’ function so I can type in [tag="Partial-birth"]

whoops, no search option. Forgot this isn’t dKos.