<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NBC receives video, photos mailed by Cho between shootings; postmarked 9:01 a.m. Monday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightvoices.com/2007/04/18/nbc-receives-video-photos-mailed-by-cho-between-shootings-postmarked-901-am-monday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/04/18/nbc-receives-video-photos-mailed-by-cho-between-shootings-postmarked-901-am-monday/</link>
	<description>in all matter of opinion, our adversaries are insane.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:05:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daisy Bullock</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/04/18/nbc-receives-video-photos-mailed-by-cho-between-shootings-postmarked-901-am-monday/comment-page-1/#comment-736162</link>
		<dc:creator>Daisy Bullock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 05:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/04/18/nbc-receives-video-photos-mailed-by-cho-between-shootings-postmarked-901-am-monday/#comment-736162</guid>
		<description>Hmm,... I don&#039;t usually comment but yea. That was good. I concur.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm,&#8230; I don&#8217;t usually comment but yea. That was good. I concur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrmrArtyOffcr</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/04/18/nbc-receives-video-photos-mailed-by-cho-between-shootings-postmarked-901-am-monday/comment-page-1/#comment-426181</link>
		<dc:creator>FrmrArtyOffcr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 01:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/04/18/nbc-receives-video-photos-mailed-by-cho-between-shootings-postmarked-901-am-monday/#comment-426181</guid>
		<description>Better a liberal crackpot than a liberal who&#039;s a crack shot. Oh wait, what am I saying, liberals don&#039;t like guns well enough to actually fire them enough to become crack shots. LOL

I got into a gun control argument with a person who turned out to be a Poli Sci professor. Of course she had a high and mighty, I have a piled higher and deeper tone to her, but she still refused to logically discuss the point that gun control has no history of stopping violent crime. I wonder how she&#039;d respond if I told her that while she was still in elementary school, I had asked Ramsey Clark a question about crime prevention that refuted his entire evening&#039;s commentary and he refused to respond to it. Or perhaps I could point out that I got my BA in Poli Sci with a minor in history while she was still in jr high at best? Other than become attornies, exactly what use is a Poli Sci degree, especially an advanced one? It doesn&#039;t teach anyone how to produce anything but idiotic treatises on utopian societies that are contrary to human nature. One of the best comments I ever heard from a Poli Sci Professor was &quot; I used to be a communist until I realized that communism just doesn&#039;t work.&quot; There is a reason why I can argue Constitutional law questions, I did very well in that class, despite being the youngest one in it. The professor required that we be able to make cogent logical arguments based on case law and precedence. We also had to explain the logic behind various Supreme Court decisions. I used to do this for grades, now I do it for fun. Of course being a recovering used car salesman doesn&#039;t hurt. :wink:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better a liberal crackpot than a liberal who&#8217;s a crack shot. Oh wait, what am I saying, liberals don&#8217;t like guns well enough to actually fire them enough to become crack shots. LOL</p>
<p>I got into a gun control argument with a person who turned out to be a Poli Sci professor. Of course she had a high and mighty, I have a piled higher and deeper tone to her, but she still refused to logically discuss the point that gun control has no history of stopping violent crime. I wonder how she&#8217;d respond if I told her that while she was still in elementary school, I had asked Ramsey Clark a question about crime prevention that refuted his entire evening&#8217;s commentary and he refused to respond to it. Or perhaps I could point out that I got my BA in Poli Sci with a minor in history while she was still in jr high at best? Other than become attornies, exactly what use is a Poli Sci degree, especially an advanced one? It doesn&#8217;t teach anyone how to produce anything but idiotic treatises on utopian societies that are contrary to human nature. One of the best comments I ever heard from a Poli Sci Professor was &#8221; I used to be a communist until I realized that communism just doesn&#8217;t work.&#8221; There is a reason why I can argue Constitutional law questions, I did very well in that class, despite being the youngest one in it. The professor required that we be able to make cogent logical arguments based on case law and precedence. We also had to explain the logic behind various Supreme Court decisions. I used to do this for grades, now I do it for fun. Of course being a recovering used car salesman doesn&#8217;t hurt. <img src='http://rightvoices.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=':wink:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/04/18/nbc-receives-video-photos-mailed-by-cho-between-shootings-postmarked-901-am-monday/comment-page-1/#comment-425577</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/04/18/nbc-receives-video-photos-mailed-by-cho-between-shootings-postmarked-901-am-monday/#comment-425577</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;It seems that she was just another liberal crackpot...&lt;/em&gt;

There is an oversupply of them these days...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>It seems that she was just another liberal crackpot&#8230;</em></p>
<p>There is an oversupply of them these days&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peejz</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/04/18/nbc-receives-video-photos-mailed-by-cho-between-shootings-postmarked-901-am-monday/comment-page-1/#comment-425349</link>
		<dc:creator>Peejz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 13:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/04/18/nbc-receives-video-photos-mailed-by-cho-between-shootings-postmarked-901-am-monday/#comment-425349</guid>
		<description>The above info I provided coincides with the exhibit at Fords museum....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The above info I provided coincides with the exhibit at Fords museum&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peejz</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/04/18/nbc-receives-video-photos-mailed-by-cho-between-shootings-postmarked-901-am-monday/comment-page-1/#comment-425345</link>
		<dc:creator>Peejz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 13:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/04/18/nbc-receives-video-photos-mailed-by-cho-between-shootings-postmarked-901-am-monday/#comment-425345</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.answers.com/topic/sara-jane-moore&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sara Jane Moore &lt;/a&gt;(born Sara Jane Kahn[1] on February 15, 1930[2] in Charleston, West Virginia[1]) attempted to assassinate US President Gerald Ford on September 22, 1975 outside the St. Francis Hotel in San Francisco, just seventeen days after Lynette &quot;Squeaky&quot; Fromme had attempted to assassinate Ford.[3] Moore was 40 feet away from the President[4] when she fired a single shot at him.[3] The bullet missed the President because bystander Oliver Sipple grabbed Moore&#039;s arm and then pulled her to the ground, using his hand to keep the gun from firing a second time.[5][6] Sipple said at the time: &quot;I saw [her gun] pointed out there and I grabbed for it. [...] I lunged and grabbed the woman&#039;s arm and the gun went off.&quot;[7] The single shot which Moore did manage to fire from her .38-caliber revolver ricocheted off the entrance to the hotel[8] and slightly injured a bystander.[9]

Moore had been evaluated by the Secret Service earlier in 1975, but they had decided she presented no danger to the President.[10] She had been picked up by police on an illegal handgun charge the day before the Ford incident but was released. Police kept the .44 pistol and 113 rounds of ammunition.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.answers.com/topic/lynette-fromme&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;And Squeaky&lt;/a&gt;:

Assassination attempt
On the morning of September 5, 1975, she went to Sacramento&#039;s Capitol Park (purportedly to plead with President Gerald Ford about the plight of the California redwoods) dressed as a nun and armed with a .45 Colt automatic, which she pointed at Ford. The weapon was loaded with four rounds, but none were in the firing chamber. She was immediately restrained by Secret Service agents, and while she was being further restrained and handcuffed, managed to say a few sentences to the on-scene cameras, emphasizing that the gun did not &quot;go off&quot;.[1] Fromme is reported to have subsequently told the Sacramento Bee that she had deliberately ejected the round in her weapon&#039;s chamber before leaving home that morning, and a .45 ACP round was later found in her bathroom by investigators.[2]

After a lengthy trial in which she refused to cooperate with her own defense, she was convicted of the attempted assassination of the president and received a life sentence under a 1965 law (prompted by the assassination of President John F. Kennedy) which specified a maximum sentence of life in prison for attempted presidential assassinations. When U.S. Attorney Duane Keyes recommended severe punishment because she was &quot;full of hate and violence,&quot; Fromme threw an apple at him, hitting him between the eyes. &quot;If you find a apple that has a little spot on it. You cut out that spot.&quot;~ Lynette Fromme</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.answers.com/topic/sara-jane-moore" rel="nofollow">Sara Jane Moore </a>(born Sara Jane Kahn[1] on February 15, 1930[2] in Charleston, West Virginia[1]) attempted to assassinate US President Gerald Ford on September 22, 1975 outside the St. Francis Hotel in San Francisco, just seventeen days after Lynette &#8220;Squeaky&#8221; Fromme had attempted to assassinate Ford.[3] Moore was 40 feet away from the President[4] when she fired a single shot at him.[3] The bullet missed the President because bystander Oliver Sipple grabbed Moore&#8217;s arm and then pulled her to the ground, using his hand to keep the gun from firing a second time.[5][6] Sipple said at the time: &#8220;I saw [her gun] pointed out there and I grabbed for it. [...] I lunged and grabbed the woman&#8217;s arm and the gun went off.&#8221;[7] The single shot which Moore did manage to fire from her .38-caliber revolver ricocheted off the entrance to the hotel[8] and slightly injured a bystander.[9]</p>
<p>Moore had been evaluated by the Secret Service earlier in 1975, but they had decided she presented no danger to the President.[10] She had been picked up by police on an illegal handgun charge the day before the Ford incident but was released. Police kept the .44 pistol and 113 rounds of ammunition.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.answers.com/topic/lynette-fromme" rel="nofollow">And Squeaky</a>:</p>
<p>Assassination attempt<br />
On the morning of September 5, 1975, she went to Sacramento&#8217;s Capitol Park (purportedly to plead with President Gerald Ford about the plight of the California redwoods) dressed as a nun and armed with a .45 Colt automatic, which she pointed at Ford. The weapon was loaded with four rounds, but none were in the firing chamber. She was immediately restrained by Secret Service agents, and while she was being further restrained and handcuffed, managed to say a few sentences to the on-scene cameras, emphasizing that the gun did not &#8220;go off&#8221;.[1] Fromme is reported to have subsequently told the Sacramento Bee that she had deliberately ejected the round in her weapon&#8217;s chamber before leaving home that morning, and a .45 ACP round was later found in her bathroom by investigators.[2]</p>
<p>After a lengthy trial in which she refused to cooperate with her own defense, she was convicted of the attempted assassination of the president and received a life sentence under a 1965 law (prompted by the assassination of President John F. Kennedy) which specified a maximum sentence of life in prison for attempted presidential assassinations. When U.S. Attorney Duane Keyes recommended severe punishment because she was &#8220;full of hate and violence,&#8221; Fromme threw an apple at him, hitting him between the eyes. &#8220;If you find a apple that has a little spot on it. You cut out that spot.&#8221;~ Lynette Fromme</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrmrArtyOffcr</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/04/18/nbc-receives-video-photos-mailed-by-cho-between-shootings-postmarked-901-am-monday/comment-page-1/#comment-424466</link>
		<dc:creator>FrmrArtyOffcr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 04:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/04/18/nbc-receives-video-photos-mailed-by-cho-between-shootings-postmarked-901-am-monday/#comment-424466</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;
Take the following post with a healthy dose of salt because it is from Wikipedia.

I stand corrected. She was picked up the day before she attempted to shoot Ford carrying a 44 and over 100 rounds of ammo. She missed because a bystander saw the gun and forced her hand down when she fired. She will be eligible for parole in September of this year. 

It seems that she was just another liberal crackpot who couldn&#039;t keep a real life and blamed it on &quot;the man&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;<br />
Take the following post with a healthy dose of salt because it is from Wikipedia.</p>
<p>I stand corrected. She was picked up the day before she attempted to shoot Ford carrying a 44 and over 100 rounds of ammo. She missed because a bystander saw the gun and forced her hand down when she fired. She will be eligible for parole in September of this year. </p>
<p>It seems that she was just another liberal crackpot who couldn&#8217;t keep a real life and blamed it on &#8220;the man&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrmrArtyOffcr</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/04/18/nbc-receives-video-photos-mailed-by-cho-between-shootings-postmarked-901-am-monday/comment-page-1/#comment-424449</link>
		<dc:creator>FrmrArtyOffcr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 04:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/04/18/nbc-receives-video-photos-mailed-by-cho-between-shootings-postmarked-901-am-monday/#comment-424449</guid>
		<description>I would guess that she meant a 357 Magnum. A 357 is the same diameter as a 38 Special and the 38 Special rounds can be used in a 357 Magnum, though not the other way around. 357 magnums can be very concealable.  About the only 44 Magnums available at the time would&#039;ve been a Smith and Wesson model 29 or a Ruger Redhawk. Neither of which are readily concealable on someone with a small frame. 

That&#039;s one of the funniest things I see on tv or movies is the little 5&#039;2&quot; woman running around with 2 44 Magnum Desert Eagles. They might try it once, but with the weight and size of a Desert Eagle, they are not going to do it more than once. Loaded those things are larger and heavier than some submachine guns. Personally, I&#039;d opt for the SMG. If you&#039;re going to prison for life without parole for attempting to kill someone, you ought to at least make sure you succeed. Who am I kidding, I&#039;d simply sit back with a hunting rifle and shoot them from beyond the limits of the security detail cordon. Why fail and go to jail, when you can succeed and have a pretty good chance of getting away with it?

BTW Moore and Fromme are both still in prison and really pissed about Chapman&#039;s treatment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would guess that she meant a 357 Magnum. A 357 is the same diameter as a 38 Special and the 38 Special rounds can be used in a 357 Magnum, though not the other way around. 357 magnums can be very concealable.  About the only 44 Magnums available at the time would&#8217;ve been a Smith and Wesson model 29 or a Ruger Redhawk. Neither of which are readily concealable on someone with a small frame. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s one of the funniest things I see on tv or movies is the little 5&#8242;2&#8243; woman running around with 2 44 Magnum Desert Eagles. They might try it once, but with the weight and size of a Desert Eagle, they are not going to do it more than once. Loaded those things are larger and heavier than some submachine guns. Personally, I&#8217;d opt for the SMG. If you&#8217;re going to prison for life without parole for attempting to kill someone, you ought to at least make sure you succeed. Who am I kidding, I&#8217;d simply sit back with a hunting rifle and shoot them from beyond the limits of the security detail cordon. Why fail and go to jail, when you can succeed and have a pretty good chance of getting away with it?</p>
<p>BTW Moore and Fromme are both still in prison and really pissed about Chapman&#8217;s treatment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PCD</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/04/18/nbc-receives-video-photos-mailed-by-cho-between-shootings-postmarked-901-am-monday/comment-page-1/#comment-421422</link>
		<dc:creator>PCD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/04/18/nbc-receives-video-photos-mailed-by-cho-between-shootings-postmarked-901-am-monday/#comment-421422</guid>
		<description>16, FAO, thanks for the correction on the names, but Sarah Moore did get off some rounds.  When arrested she said if she had her Magnum (I forget if she said .357 or .44), she have gotten Ford.  I think she used a .38Special Police Positive.  That weapon has much less recoil and muzzle rise than the .357 or especially the .44Mag.  I can see her aiming low on the first round and missing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>16, FAO, thanks for the correction on the names, but Sarah Moore did get off some rounds.  When arrested she said if she had her Magnum (I forget if she said .357 or .44), she have gotten Ford.  I think she used a .38Special Police Positive.  That weapon has much less recoil and muzzle rise than the .357 or especially the .44Mag.  I can see her aiming low on the first round and missing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrmrArtyOffcr</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/04/18/nbc-receives-video-photos-mailed-by-cho-between-shootings-postmarked-901-am-monday/comment-page-1/#comment-420798</link>
		<dc:creator>FrmrArtyOffcr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 04:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/04/18/nbc-receives-video-photos-mailed-by-cho-between-shootings-postmarked-901-am-monday/#comment-420798</guid>
		<description>BTW I heard John Lott&#039;s credentials this morning. Until he did the study that lead to the book &quot;More Guns, Less Crime&quot; he was an avowed anti gun liberal. Isn&#039;t it amazing how intelligent people with an open (even if only open a crack) mind can come around when the facts are persuasive enough. Of course on another post AKD made a number of claims about the veracity of John Lott&#039;s statistics, but I&#039;d lay money that those that AKD quoted do NOT have Lott&#039;s credentials. He wouldn&#039;t have had the positions that he had were he guilty of playing with his numbers to reach a predetermined conclusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW I heard John Lott&#8217;s credentials this morning. Until he did the study that lead to the book &#8220;More Guns, Less Crime&#8221; he was an avowed anti gun liberal. Isn&#8217;t it amazing how intelligent people with an open (even if only open a crack) mind can come around when the facts are persuasive enough. Of course on another post AKD made a number of claims about the veracity of John Lott&#8217;s statistics, but I&#8217;d lay money that those that AKD quoted do NOT have Lott&#8217;s credentials. He wouldn&#8217;t have had the positions that he had were he guilty of playing with his numbers to reach a predetermined conclusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrmrArtyOffcr</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/04/18/nbc-receives-video-photos-mailed-by-cho-between-shootings-postmarked-901-am-monday/comment-page-1/#comment-420791</link>
		<dc:creator>FrmrArtyOffcr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 03:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/04/18/nbc-receives-video-photos-mailed-by-cho-between-shootings-postmarked-901-am-monday/#comment-420791</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re welcome Robert. 

The two nutcases who tried to shoot Ford were Lynette (sp) &quot;Squeeky&quot; Fromme and Sarah Jane Moore. Neither of whom got off a shot. David Mark Chapman who was caught with a gun and planned to kill Jimmy Carter but got off on an insanity defense, and 18 months later shot and nearly killed President Reagan and James Brady (with a firearm that he had purchased illegally) is in a mental hospital, getting supervised day trips and is petitioning to get unsupervised weekend furloughs. What is wrong with that picture?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re welcome Robert. </p>
<p>The two nutcases who tried to shoot Ford were Lynette (sp) &#8220;Squeeky&#8221; Fromme and Sarah Jane Moore. Neither of whom got off a shot. David Mark Chapman who was caught with a gun and planned to kill Jimmy Carter but got off on an insanity defense, and 18 months later shot and nearly killed President Reagan and James Brady (with a firearm that he had purchased illegally) is in a mental hospital, getting supervised day trips and is petitioning to get unsupervised weekend furloughs. What is wrong with that picture?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
