Comments on: Nancy Throws Out Thomas Jefferson’s Procedures ” Rejects Procedural Issue On Books Since 1822,House Democrats Just Blinked http://rightvoices.com/2007/05/16/nancy-throws-out-thomas-jeffersons-procedures-%e2%80%94-rejects-procedural-issue-on-books-since-1822house-democrats-just-blinked/ in all matter of opinion, our adversaries are insane. Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:05:09 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: The Populist http://rightvoices.com/2007/05/16/nancy-throws-out-thomas-jeffersons-procedures-%e2%80%94-rejects-procedural-issue-on-books-since-1822house-democrats-just-blinked/comment-page-1/#comment-481961 The Populist Fri, 18 May 2007 05:39:35 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2007/05/16/nancy-throws-out-thomas-jeffersons-procedures-%e2%80%94-rejects-procedural-issue-on-books-since-1822house-democrats-just-blinked/#comment-481961 Man, I dunno what happened up there... But this is a <strong>Blog</strong> and <em>NOT </em>a <strong>BBS</strong> Sorry.... :mrgreen::roll::razz: -TP Man, I dunno what happened up there…

But this is a Blog and NOT a BBS

Sorry…. :mrgreen: :roll::razz:

-TP

]]> By: The Populist http://rightvoices.com/2007/05/16/nancy-throws-out-thomas-jeffersons-procedures-%e2%80%94-rejects-procedural-issue-on-books-since-1822house-democrats-just-blinked/comment-page-1/#comment-481957 The Populist Fri, 18 May 2007 05:38:09 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2007/05/16/nancy-throws-out-thomas-jeffersons-procedures-%e2%80%94-rejects-procedural-issue-on-books-since-1822house-democrats-just-blinked/#comment-481957 Sorry but I won't go there on here or on any other <strong>BBS</strong>. I strive stay above the fray, although admitedly sometimes fail. I've been on this <strong>BBS </strong>for a very long time.Blog I used to run a <strong>BBS</strong>! So, I know the difference. :lol: -TP Sorry but I won’t go there on here or on any other BBS. I strive stay above the fray, although admitedly sometimes fail.

I’ve been on this BBS for a very long time.Blog

I used to run a BBS! So, I know the difference.

:lol:

-TP

]]> By: Peejz http://rightvoices.com/2007/05/16/nancy-throws-out-thomas-jeffersons-procedures-%e2%80%94-rejects-procedural-issue-on-books-since-1822house-democrats-just-blinked/comment-page-1/#comment-480494 Peejz Thu, 17 May 2007 20:32:35 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2007/05/16/nancy-throws-out-thomas-jeffersons-procedures-%e2%80%94-rejects-procedural-issue-on-books-since-1822house-democrats-just-blinked/#comment-480494 11- What criminal activities? <a href="http://rightvoices.com/2007/05/17/paul-wolfowitzs-judges-may-have-ethical-issues-of-their-own/" rel="nofollow">Did you miss this post</a>? Or convienently overlook it? 11- What criminal activities? Did you miss this post? Or convienently overlook it?

]]> By: Peejz http://rightvoices.com/2007/05/16/nancy-throws-out-thomas-jeffersons-procedures-%e2%80%94-rejects-procedural-issue-on-books-since-1822house-democrats-just-blinked/comment-page-1/#comment-480488 Peejz Thu, 17 May 2007 20:31:06 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2007/05/16/nancy-throws-out-thomas-jeffersons-procedures-%e2%80%94-rejects-procedural-issue-on-books-since-1822house-democrats-just-blinked/#comment-480488 9 and 10- You've got that right!:wink: 9 and 10- You’ve got that right!:wink:

]]> By: snowy egret http://rightvoices.com/2007/05/16/nancy-throws-out-thomas-jeffersons-procedures-%e2%80%94-rejects-procedural-issue-on-books-since-1822house-democrats-just-blinked/comment-page-1/#comment-480238 snowy egret Thu, 17 May 2007 18:50:38 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2007/05/16/nancy-throws-out-thomas-jeffersons-procedures-%e2%80%94-rejects-procedural-issue-on-books-since-1822house-democrats-just-blinked/#comment-480238 And i see that the demacrat controled CONgress is rating 29% in latest polls bad news for the liberals:razz: And i see that the demacrat controled CONgress is rating 29% in latest polls bad news for the liberals:razz:

]]> By: AKD http://rightvoices.com/2007/05/16/nancy-throws-out-thomas-jeffersons-procedures-%e2%80%94-rejects-procedural-issue-on-books-since-1822house-democrats-just-blinked/comment-page-1/#comment-479816 AKD Thu, 17 May 2007 16:17:18 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2007/05/16/nancy-throws-out-thomas-jeffersons-procedures-%e2%80%94-rejects-procedural-issue-on-books-since-1822house-democrats-just-blinked/#comment-479816 (I didn't see post 10 when I posted 11). (I didn’t see post 10 when I posted 11).

]]> By: AKD http://rightvoices.com/2007/05/16/nancy-throws-out-thomas-jeffersons-procedures-%e2%80%94-rejects-procedural-issue-on-books-since-1822house-democrats-just-blinked/comment-page-1/#comment-479813 AKD Thu, 17 May 2007 16:16:24 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2007/05/16/nancy-throws-out-thomas-jeffersons-procedures-%e2%80%94-rejects-procedural-issue-on-books-since-1822house-democrats-just-blinked/#comment-479813 10. OK...I'll withdraw the question about who the automatons are. I guess that it's fairly clear anyway. 10. OK…I’ll withdraw the question about who the automatons are. I guess that it’s fairly clear anyway.

]]> By: AKD http://rightvoices.com/2007/05/16/nancy-throws-out-thomas-jeffersons-procedures-%e2%80%94-rejects-procedural-issue-on-books-since-1822house-democrats-just-blinked/comment-page-1/#comment-479799 AKD Thu, 17 May 2007 16:11:57 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2007/05/16/nancy-throws-out-thomas-jeffersons-procedures-%e2%80%94-rejects-procedural-issue-on-books-since-1822house-democrats-just-blinked/#comment-479799 <em>So, tell me why you approve of Pelosi's actions- simply becasue it may be legal, or becasue you think payback is deserved to the Republicans, or perhaps becasue Jefferson's precedence are irrelevant?</em> Where did I say that I approve? Actually, the actions being a legal payback seems reasonable enough. Basically, I was calling attention to the fact that while Wolfowitz' criminal activities are downplayed or ignored, we get 5,000 posts about Pelosi wearing white after labor day. I have never seen you criticize any poster on this site for this sort of one-sided mind-set. Please link to where I'm wrong, where you've argued with one of the automatons (which one?? as only a handful of folks post here). So, tell me why you approve of Pelosi’s actions- simply becasue it may be legal, or becasue you think payback is deserved to the Republicans, or perhaps becasue Jefferson’s precedence are irrelevant?

Where did I say that I approve? Actually, the actions being a legal payback seems reasonable enough. Basically, I was calling attention to the fact that while Wolfowitz’ criminal activities are downplayed or ignored, we get 5,000 posts about Pelosi wearing white after labor day.

I have never seen you criticize any poster on this site for this sort of one-sided mind-set. Please link to where I’m wrong, where you’ve argued with one of the automatons (which one?? as only a handful of folks post here).

]]> By: TedintheShed http://rightvoices.com/2007/05/16/nancy-throws-out-thomas-jeffersons-procedures-%e2%80%94-rejects-procedural-issue-on-books-since-1822house-democrats-just-blinked/comment-page-1/#comment-479790 TedintheShed Thu, 17 May 2007 16:07:54 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2007/05/16/nancy-throws-out-thomas-jeffersons-procedures-%e2%80%94-rejects-procedural-issue-on-books-since-1822house-democrats-just-blinked/#comment-479790 <em>"Incidentally, who are some of the "the mindless Reublican automatons"you have in mind? Robert? PCD? BonBon? I've never seen you argue with one of them."</em> Sorry but I won't go there on here or on any other BBS. I strive stay above the fray, although admitedly sometimes fail. I've been on this BBS for a very long time. They know my positions already. Peejz and I had our heated discussion before- ask her if you don't believe me. Mike and I used to regularly tumble. Robert and I and FAO have also debated issue. We've long ago already had our wars. They disagree with me on about half the issue, maybe a little less. In all of those instances they may disagree with me, but in most (not all instances) they don't "argue" with me. I don't approach issues from an elitist stand point. I don't appraoch them in an aggressive attack stance either. I try to approach them from a position of basic respect and in a tone that reflects that. “Incidentally, who are some of the “the mindless Reublican automatons”you have in mind? Robert? PCD? BonBon? I’ve never seen you argue with one of them.”

Sorry but I won’t go there on here or on any other BBS. I strive stay above the fray, although admitedly sometimes fail.

I’ve been on this BBS for a very long time. They know my positions already. Peejz and I had our heated discussion before- ask her if you don’t believe me. Mike and I used to regularly tumble. Robert and I and FAO have also debated issue. We’ve long ago already had our wars.

They disagree with me on about half the issue, maybe a little less. In all of those instances they may disagree with me, but in most (not all instances) they don’t “argue” with me. I don’t approach issues from an elitist stand point. I don’t appraoch them in an aggressive attack stance either. I try to approach them from a position of basic respect and in a tone that reflects that.

]]> By: TedintheShed http://rightvoices.com/2007/05/16/nancy-throws-out-thomas-jeffersons-procedures-%e2%80%94-rejects-procedural-issue-on-books-since-1822house-democrats-just-blinked/comment-page-1/#comment-479755 TedintheShed Thu, 17 May 2007 15:55:03 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2007/05/16/nancy-throws-out-thomas-jeffersons-procedures-%e2%80%94-rejects-procedural-issue-on-books-since-1822house-democrats-just-blinked/#comment-479755 <em>"You portray yourself, Ted, as an "independent voice,"disillusioned with both sides of the aisle, etc, etc. Guess what? You're posting on right voices and you're agreeing with the RV party line 98% of the time. You're a company man reluctant to give up the airs of a rock-and-roll-rebel past. Let it go."</em> LOL...if you say so. I never portayed myself as anything- that's more your interpretation. I post on RV, but also post on a dozen other BBS's and blogs. I've been called Nazi by your side and Commie by Peejz's side. I'm okay with that and your accusations as well- it tells me I am doing something right. If you want to know exactly what my thoughts are on an issue- just ask me. I will gladly clarify my position. However, I will charatcerize myself as a conservative leaning moderate, if you really need a label. But like you, I've critisized the right on a right blog, but unlike you will also critisize the left on a right blog. I will not preclude one for the other- that's called taking a side. Yeah- I am disillusioned by both sides of the isle. The Democrats and the Republicans will be the death of this country. So, I should deflect what Pelosi is doing to a Wolfowitz based comment like you? What is the connection? I've never once here or anywhere else justified poor behaviour by pointing to other's poor behaviour and I never will. We can get in depth as to why I consider Wolfiwitz action to be less relevant than Pelosi's if you wish. But don't use deflections tactics- you'll be called on it. Bacck to topic. So, tell me why you approve of Pelosi's actions- simply becasue it may be legal, or becasue you think payback is deserved to the Republicans, or perhaps becasue Jefferson's precedence are irrelevant? “You portray yourself, Ted, as an “independent voice,”disillusioned with both sides of the aisle, etc, etc. Guess what? You’re posting on right voices and you’re agreeing with the RV party line 98% of the time. You’re a company man reluctant to give up the airs of a rock-and-roll-rebel past. Let it go.”

LOL…if you say so. I never portayed myself as anything- that’s more your interpretation. I post on RV, but also post on a dozen other BBS’s and blogs. I’ve been called Nazi by your side and Commie by Peejz’s side. I’m okay with that and your accusations as well- it tells me I am doing something right. If you want to know exactly what my thoughts are on an issue- just ask me. I will gladly clarify my position. However, I will charatcerize myself as a conservative leaning moderate, if you really need a label.

But like you, I’ve critisized the right on a right blog, but unlike you will also critisize the left on a right blog. I will not preclude one for the other- that’s called taking a side.

Yeah- I am disillusioned by both sides of the isle. The Democrats and the Republicans will be the death of this country. So, I should deflect what Pelosi is doing to a Wolfowitz based comment like you? What is the connection? I’ve never once here or anywhere else justified poor behaviour by pointing to other’s poor behaviour and I never will.

We can get in depth as to why I consider Wolfiwitz action to be less relevant than Pelosi’s if you wish. But don’t use deflections tactics- you’ll be called on it.

Bacck to topic.

So, tell me why you approve of Pelosi’s actions- simply becasue it may be legal, or becasue you think payback is deserved to the Republicans, or perhaps becasue Jefferson’s precedence are irrelevant?

]]>