Estimates of human evolution may be off by 400,000 years

Posted by on 6/24/2007

I thought the ”debate” was over? 

National News

4 Comments.

  1. snowy egret 6/24/2007 at June 24, 2007 - 10:11 PM

    still trying to prove this evolution poppycock and all they have to show for it is afew puny bone fragments and some crack-pot theory and wackos like RICHARD DAWKINS and his redculous babble:razz:

  2. San Francisco Liberal 6/25/2007 at June 25, 2007 - 08:01 PM

    Certainly the debate over the reality of evolution is over…

    …but this isn’t about biological evolution. It’s about the timing of mankinds shift from hunter-gatherer to agricultural society.

    The research from this one guy still needs to be looked over and peer reviewed, so I would hold off any knee-jerk judgements.

  3. snowy egret 6/26/2007 at June 26, 2007 - 08:07 AM

    Charles Darwin never saw evolution happen and all we can get from NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC is a front covor showing a little oratang shaved:razz:

  4. San Francisco Liberal 6/26/2007 at June 26, 2007 - 09:17 PM

    dude, you are f*cking crazy.

    :lol: