“When it comes to the First Amendment, too many people in this country have a distorted sense of what that document actually means”
This is especially true of the liberal elite media which construe the First Amendment in the following manner: 1) Congress shall not make any attempt to censor or diminish the rights of any media outlet–except those dominated by the right. 2) Congress shall not restrict flag burning or any form of pornography. 3) Religious people do not have the right to express their religion in public. 4) Political speech is equal to money and therefore can be censored at whim.
Matthew links to Jonah Goldberg, who points out that liberals and media “reformists” have misrecognized what free speech laws really were intended to be :Â
For a long time, we concluded the best way to protect political speech was to defend other forms of expression – commercial, artistic and just plain wacky – so as to make sure that our core right to political speech was kept safe. Like establishing outposts in hostile territory, we safeguarded the outer boundaries of acceptable expression to keep the more important home fire of political speech burning freely. That’s why in the 1960s and 1970s, all sorts of stuff – pornography, strip clubs, etc, – was deregulated by the Supreme Court on the grounds that this was legitimate “expression” of some sort. [...]
[S]uch buffoonery would be pardonable if the grand bargain of defending marginal speech so as to better fortify the protective cocoon around sacrosanct political speech were still in effect. But that bargain fell apart almost from the get-go. At the same moment we were letting our freak flags fly when it came to unimportant speech, we started turning the screws on political speech. After Watergate, campaign finance laws started restricting what independent political groups could say and when they could say it, culminating in the McCain-Feingold law that barred “outside” criticism of politicians when it would matter most – i.e., around an election.
And that’s why we live in a world where cutting NEA grants is called censorship, a student’s “Bong Hits 4 Jesus” sign is hailed as vital political speech, and a group of citizens asking fellow citizens to petition their elected representatives to change their minds is supposedly guilty of illegal speech.
That is until this week. In one case, the Supreme Court ruled that a student attending a mandatory school event can be disciplined by the school’s principal for holding up a sign saying “Bong Hits 4 Jesus,” and in another it ruled that a pro-life group can, in fact, urge citizens to contact their senators even if one of the senators happens to be running for re-election. Staggeringly, these were close and controversial calls.
Trackposted to Outside the Beltway, The Virtuous Republic, Perri Nelson’s Website, Right Truth, Big Dog’s Weblog, Stuck On Stupid, The Amboy Times, Leaning Straight Up, Pursuing Holiness, CatSynth.com “catback” weekend, The Magical Rose Garden, Right Celebrity, third world county, Woman Honor Thyself, Nuke’s news and views, Pirate’s Cove, The Pink Flamingo, Dumb Ox Daily News, Church and State, Blog @ MoreWhat.com, Committees of Correspondence, The Random Yak, A Blog For All, 123beta, DeMediacratic Nation, Jeanette’s Celebrity Corner, Webloggin, Cao’s Blog, , Conservative Cat, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, The World According to Carl, Walls of the City, Blue Star Chronicles, High Desert Wanderer, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
July 2, 2007 - 07:56 AM on July 2nd, 2007
Liberal Brainwashing for Dummies
If your 12-year-old suddenly has a bad attitude toward church, gun owners, loggers, or meat-eaters and is showing way too much interest in running the mall with boys, check her backpack for Girls’ Life magazine.
…
July 2, 2007 - 08:05 AM on July 2nd, 2007
And they have distorted the meaning of the 2nd amendment as well they still cant get past the word MILITIA and say it just means our armed forces i mean even REGIS FILBIN and WHO WANTS TO BE A MILLIONARE is totaly ingorant about the 2nd amendment:razz:
July 2, 2007 - 08:39 AM on July 2nd, 2007
Closing Open classrpoms
I thought open classrooms were a dumb design idea thirty years ago. It is long past time for Florida to be eliminating them.
July 2, 2007 - 10:10 AM on July 2nd, 2007
Oh Dear….Hamas Mickey Killed by Israeli – the Fa
Further lessons from Hamas, Palestine and the rest of their ilk that Israel is EVIL….Poor, sweet, innocent Hamas Mickey murdered in cold blood….
July 2, 2007 - 10:38 AM on July 2nd, 2007
Monday Frivol: Who’s the Weenie Now?
The Oscar Meyer Wienermobile travels around the country making appearances and handing out hot dogs and assorted wiener-themed memorabilia. During a recent trip through Arizona, the giant rolling hot dog caught the attention of Arizona Highway Patro…
July 2, 2007 - 10:40 AM on July 2nd, 2007
Hillary Clinton Counts on You Not Remembering
It is almost unbelievable that Hillary Clinton is feigning disbelief that someone � anyone � would think illegal Cuban immigrants might pose a terrorists threat.
I would think she wouldn�t want to go there. At. All.
July 2, 2007 - 11:10 AM on July 2nd, 2007
Martyrs, Jihadists Are NOT the Brightest Bulbs on
Interesting reads today from NRO from three very good writers. The overall impression put forward by the media has been that these latest attacks by terrorists are not really al Qaeda link …
July 2, 2007 - 12:19 PM on July 2nd, 2007
Why no one other than the US has ever used nuclear weapons
As to why we are the only nation that has ever used nuclear weapons, there are three reasons:
1) Because we used them when we had to. That has put the fear of god into many nations.
2_ Others who have nuclear weapons do not have more than we have and a…
July 2, 2007 - 01:17 PM on July 2nd, 2007
[...] Trackposted to Outside the Beltway, The Virtuous Republic, Perri Nelson’s Website, Right Truth, Big Dog’s Weblog, Stuck On Stupid, The Amboy Times, Leaning Straight Up, Adeline and Hazel, CatSynth.com “catback”weekend, The Magical Rose Garden, Right Celebrity, third world county, Woman Honor Thyself, Stageleft, Nuke’s news and views, Pirate’s Cove, The Pink Flamingo, Dumb Ox Daily News, Right Voices, Church and State, Blog @ MoreWhat.com, Committees of Correspondence, A Blog For All, The Random Yak, DeMediacratic Nation, 123beta, Jeanette’s Celebrity Corner, Webloggin, Cao’s Blog, , Conservative Cat, Diary of the Mad Pigeon, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, The World According to Carl, Walls of the City, Blue Star Chronicles, High Desert Wanderer, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe. Filed under Christian Living | | Trackback URI [...]
July 2, 2007 - 01:26 PM on July 2nd, 2007
[...] A very heartfelt welcome to readers MoreWhat.com, Perri Nelson’s Website, Committees Of Correspondence, The Random Yak, DeMediacratic Nation, Big Dog’s Weblog, Stuck On Stupid, Webloggin’, Leaning Straight Up, Conservative Cat, Adeline And Hazel, Pursuing Holiness, Diary Of The Mad Pigeon, third world county, Stageleft, The Crazy Rants Of Samantha Burns, Blue Star Chronicles, Pirate’s Cove, The Pink Flamingo, High Desert Wanderer, Right Voices, The Yankee Sailor. Also thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe. [...]
July 2, 2007 - 05:31 PM on July 2nd, 2007
Senate No Amnesty Scorecard: The Sellouts
Now we have the Sellouts. Go figure, all Dems and one pseudo-Independent
…
July 2, 2007 - 06:26 PM on July 2nd, 2007
Summer of Terror?
It’s certainly within the realm of possibility. AQ took eight years between WTC attacks, Jose Padilla was caught in an alleged dirty bomb plot in 2002, and Islamists are still bound by the Koran to wage jihad. Couple that with
July 2, 2007 - 10:51 PM on July 2nd, 2007
What’s Happened to Women?
Truth and Hope Report Show Notes
Cynthia Rodriguez wearing a profanity-laden tank top to Yankee Stadium reminds us of a time when women were the protectors of decency and virtue in society, not among those most likely to violate them.
Feminism has pu…
July 4, 2007 - 11:02 PM on July 4th, 2007
‘It is undoubtedly true that all citizens capable of bearing arms contitute the reserve military or the reserve militia of the United States….”
US Supreme Court, 1886
July 5, 2007 - 05:40 AM on July 5th, 2007
Only in the last 60 or so years has the SCOTUS twisted the 2nd Amendment to be interpreted as a state’s right and not an individual right.
July 5, 2007 - 06:39 AM on July 5th, 2007
[...] Trackposted to Outside the Beltway, The Virtuous Republic, Perri Nelson’s Website, Right Truth, Big Dog’s Weblog, Stuck On Stupid, The Amboy Times, Leaning Straight Up, CatSynth.com “catback”weekend, The Magical Rose Garden, Right Celebrity, third world county, Woman Honor Thyself, Nuke’s news and views, Pirate’s Cove, The Pink Flamingo, Dumb Ox Daily News, Right Voices, Church and State, Blog @ MoreWhat.com, Committees of Correspondence, The Random Yak, A Blog For All, DeMediacratic Nation, 123beta, Jeanette’s Celebrity Corner, Webloggin, Cao’s Blog, , Conservative Cat, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, The World According to Carl, Walls of the City, Blue Star Chronicles, High Desert Wanderer, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe. [...]
July 5, 2007 - 07:22 PM on July 5th, 2007
Actually the Supreme Court has been fairly solidly behind the 2nd Amendment. It’s pretty hard to twist the meaning of anything that short.
A Well regulated (in 1800s that meant well armed)Militia (see above post on definition of militia as every law abiding adult capable of bearing arms), being necessary to the security of a free State (as in country), the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
The bold is the text of the amendment, the italic is my commentary on it. It seems pretty damn straight forward doesn’t it? I just have to ask the liberal left wingers what part of “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED” do they not understand?
The US District court for DC has just overturned a number of provisions of the DC gun ban on the grounds that it is unconstitutional. DC has promised to appeal it to the Supreme Court. The real problem with gun ban laws is that before you can sue to get one overturned, you have to have standing. If you can’t show injury from the implementation of the statute, you can’t even get a day in court. Over half of the plaintiffs in the DC case were found to not have standing because they didn’t actually live in DC. It didn’t matter that they were subject to the laws on a daily basis by working there, they were found to not have standing because they didn’t reside in the district. One woman DID live in DC and the judges ruled that the DC requirement that she not be allowed to maintain a weapon in her home without it being unloaded and disassembled essentially deprived her of her right to a viable weapon should she be attacked at home. On those grounds, those portions of the law were overturned because they infringed on her right to own and BEAR arms. I think other provisions that required that all handguns in the District had to be registered there over 20 years ago may have also been struck down as effectively preventing law abiding citizens from owning firearms. The district even tried to claim immunity from the US Constitution because it isn’t a state. That argument flew like a lead balloon.
September 3, 2007 - 06:10 PM on September 3rd, 2007
[...] Right Voices » Blog Archive » “When it comes to the First Amendment, too many people in this cou… [...]