As court date nears, this timeline will make it understandable to the MSM:
NEW WHISTLEBLOWER WEBSITE - Equal Justice Foundation of America. See the latest trailer here.
FULL DOCUMENTATION AT HILLCAP.ORG
MARK LEVIN RANT
This story is about the Clinton role in the collapse of a public company, Stan Lee Media, Bill Clinton’s failure to honor a verbal agreement with Peter Paul to come aboard Stan Lee Media as a rainmaker, four false FEC reports, a conspiracy at the highest levels of the DNC, and the greatest campaign finance fraud in U.S. history. It is a crime that was done in broad daylight, but if people don’t see it on network news or read it in the NEW YORK TIMES or WASHPOST (or WSJ), apparently it never happened.
This case will be documented in an upcoming film: HILLARY EXPOSED (yes, I am sorry for the mental picture)
Start with an explanation of THE SMOKING GUN VIDEO recently obtained after a 2-year battle with a US attorney.
Through spokespersons, Senator Clinton has denied that she had any anything to do with coordinating the August 2000 event or soliciting contributions directly from donors. Doing so would make Peter Paul’s substantial contributions a direct donation to her Senate campaign rather than her joint fundraising committee, violating federal statutes that limit “hard money” contributions to a candidate to $2,000 per person. Furthermore, knowingly accepting or soliciting $25,000 or more in a calendar year is a felony carrying a prison sentence of up to five years.
Hillary was involved in solicitation and coordination of the massive illegal donation. It was clearly not to benefit any joint committee — it was to benefit her. You can hear Tonken tell her that she was the only reason people were attending. Hillary even solicited Cher, the in-kind value of which was never declared. None of the in-kind value of any of the performers was declared. On the tape, Hillary admits being extensively briefed by Craighead. She offers her help for the gala. In her declaration, she even accidentally admits the truth that the concert portion done by Gary Smith was for “my Senate campaign.” She must have been tired when she admitted that. Had she carried on the previous lies of her counsel, she would have said that it was for her joint fundraising committee.
After two false FEC reports, claiming only $366,000 of the more than $1.6 mil spent by Paul, Paul filed a civil suit. On July 18, 2001, his counsel held a press conference at the National Press Club, and a messenger hand delivered a demand letter to Hillary’s office. On July 11, 2001, David Kendall had accepted service for Hillary. Included were bank deposits, cancelled checks, and invoices for $1.6 mil spent by Paul. Nevertheless, Hillary allowed her treasurer, Andrew Grossman, to file a third fraudulent FEC report on July 30, claiming $401,000 for Event 39.
In Dec. 2005 was executed a Conciliation Agreement with the FEC, in which Treasurer Andrew Grossman was forced to admit hiding $721K. The campaign was fined $35,000 and ordered to file a fourth amended report, which they did in Jan. 2006. It was the fourth fraud. That report has “Spiderman” Stan Lee giving $225,000. Pursuant to his sworn video testimony, Lee gave no money. They know he gave no money.
Page 11 of the FEC General Counsel’s report exonerates Hillary. Unfortunately, their entire investigation was flawed because they were not provided with sufficient evidence, particularly evidence withheld by a US attorney. When the Senate Ethics Committee took a look at this case, they relied on the flawed FEC report and took no action against Hillary. I have a letter from their chief cousel responding to the offer of Peter Paul being willing to testify before them.
Hillary’s amazing declaration: Surprisingly, she doesn’t recall anything. Because of Paul’s extensive home videos and testimony in the David Rosen criminal trial, “I don’t recall” is not going to fly this time.
For six years, David Kendall has been maintaining that Hillary has fully cooperated with the investigations. We have found no information that she was ever called to testify to the Justice Department or the FEC. Had she fully cooperated, the campaign would have filed properly, paid their fine, returned the illegal donation, and moved on. It would have ended there.
In his book KING OF CONS, Aaron Tonken tells of sitting in the back of a van describing in detail everything that was being spent on her. It is my belief that had she filed an honest report on July 30, 2001, Rosen would have never been indicted.
There is substantial evidence that the Clintons stole SLM’s Japanese investor, and when his additional $5 million did not come to the company as promised in Nov. 2000, the cash crunch caused its collapse.
We’ll see how this is not reported and suddenly how many Clinton appointed judges get involved to dismiss or minimize the case.
Thought you might want to reference the post from which that Mark Levin rant came…
http://marklevinfan.com/?p=768