<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Blame Game has Begun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightvoices.com/2007/08/02/the-blame-game-has-begun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/08/02/the-blame-game-has-begun/</link>
	<description>in all matter of opinion, our adversaries are insane.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 14:43:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrmrArtyOffcr</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/08/02/the-blame-game-has-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-645701</link>
		<dc:creator>FrmrArtyOffcr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 02:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/08/02/the-blame-game-has-begun/#comment-645701</guid>
		<description>The last time I was in the area of Minnesota, I was stationed at Ft McCoy on a TDY assignment as a range control officer. I spent a number of evenings talking with Minnesota National Guard soldiers who were spending their summer working full time in range control at Ft McCoy. They jokingly referred to Minnesota as the land of 10,000 taxes. One told about how a Pepsi bottling plant found it more economical to relocate from western Minnesota to eastern Wisconsin ( a distance of around 400 miles) and ship their product to where they had previously been located than to continue paying the ludicrous tax rates in Minnesota. 

As for the tax cuts causing the bridge to collapse, I just have to ask. What part of increased tax REVENUES that have resulted from every tax rate reduction in the last 50 years do you not understand? What part of record high tax collections did you miss? Government may print money, but it doesn&#039;t give that money any value. (see Mexican Peso or Russian Ruble) It also doesn&#039;t produce a single bit of Gross Domestic Product. The more money left in the private sector, the more gross domestic product is produced. The more gross domestic product produced, the more taxes can be collected on it. Hence leaving more capital in the private sector (hence lower rates) increases GDP and thereby produces greater tax revenues. You don&#039;t build diddly with tax rates, you build them with tax revenues. If I told you I was going to pay you $1000 an hour but you couldn&#039;t work anywhere else and I was only going to have you work 1 hour a month, would you take that job over the one that pays $50 an hour but you would be working 40 hours a week. Your rate would be a lot higher at the $1,000 per hour, but you&#039;d take home more (higher revenue) at the $50 per hour job. Which would pay your bills better? The higher rate or the higher revenue? The dirty little secret of taxes is that money is only taxed when it changes hands. The more frequently a dollar changes hands, the greater the percentage of it ends up back in the government coffers. You don&#039;t tax wealth (see Kennedy compound in Hyannis Port), you tax when wealth changes ownership. Why do you think Teddy is so set on reinstating the estate tax? He knows that his family&#039;s wealth is tied up in a living trust and he&#039;ll never have to pay a dime of estate tax despite the estate being worth 10 times the minimum limit for the estate tax to apply. High tax rates stifle the economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last time I was in the area of Minnesota, I was stationed at Ft McCoy on a TDY assignment as a range control officer. I spent a number of evenings talking with Minnesota National Guard soldiers who were spending their summer working full time in range control at Ft McCoy. They jokingly referred to Minnesota as the land of 10,000 taxes. One told about how a Pepsi bottling plant found it more economical to relocate from western Minnesota to eastern Wisconsin ( a distance of around 400 miles) and ship their product to where they had previously been located than to continue paying the ludicrous tax rates in Minnesota. </p>
<p>As for the tax cuts causing the bridge to collapse, I just have to ask. What part of increased tax REVENUES that have resulted from every tax rate reduction in the last 50 years do you not understand? What part of record high tax collections did you miss? Government may print money, but it doesn&#8217;t give that money any value. (see Mexican Peso or Russian Ruble) It also doesn&#8217;t produce a single bit of Gross Domestic Product. The more money left in the private sector, the more gross domestic product is produced. The more gross domestic product produced, the more taxes can be collected on it. Hence leaving more capital in the private sector (hence lower rates) increases GDP and thereby produces greater tax revenues. You don&#8217;t build diddly with tax rates, you build them with tax revenues. If I told you I was going to pay you $1000 an hour but you couldn&#8217;t work anywhere else and I was only going to have you work 1 hour a month, would you take that job over the one that pays $50 an hour but you would be working 40 hours a week. Your rate would be a lot higher at the $1,000 per hour, but you&#8217;d take home more (higher revenue) at the $50 per hour job. Which would pay your bills better? The higher rate or the higher revenue? The dirty little secret of taxes is that money is only taxed when it changes hands. The more frequently a dollar changes hands, the greater the percentage of it ends up back in the government coffers. You don&#8217;t tax wealth (see Kennedy compound in Hyannis Port), you tax when wealth changes ownership. Why do you think Teddy is so set on reinstating the estate tax? He knows that his family&#8217;s wealth is tied up in a living trust and he&#8217;ll never have to pay a dime of estate tax despite the estate being worth 10 times the minimum limit for the estate tax to apply. High tax rates stifle the economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peejz</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/08/02/the-blame-game-has-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-645619</link>
		<dc:creator>Peejz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 21:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/08/02/the-blame-game-has-begun/#comment-645619</guid>
		<description>31- If only MI eould do that!:((</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>31- If only MI eould do that!:((</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TedintheShed</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/08/02/the-blame-game-has-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-645559</link>
		<dc:creator>TedintheShed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 23:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/08/02/the-blame-game-has-begun/#comment-645559</guid>
		<description>30.

One thing though- ODOT is smart enough to use the private sector to do the repairs. It gets done cheaper and at a higher quality than the gubmint could ever attain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>30.</p>
<p>One thing though- ODOT is smart enough to use the private sector to do the repairs. It gets done cheaper and at a higher quality than the gubmint could ever attain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peejz</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/08/02/the-blame-game-has-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-645543</link>
		<dc:creator>Peejz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 18:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/08/02/the-blame-game-has-begun/#comment-645543</guid>
		<description>28&amp;29-Actually, both of you are correct...In Ted&#039;s case, ODOT is responsible for the maintenence of Ohio&#039;s bridges...they maintain said bridges with funding from the state and fed&#039;s....The state is responsible for assuring that their bridges/roads are up to code.  Ohio has the resources to do the work as they budgeted correctly.

NJ looks to be a mess....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>28&amp;29-Actually, both of you are correct&#8230;In Ted&#8217;s case, ODOT is responsible for the maintenence of Ohio&#8217;s bridges&#8230;they maintain said bridges with funding from the state and fed&#8217;s&#8230;.The state is responsible for assuring that their bridges/roads are up to code.  Ohio has the resources to do the work as they budgeted correctly.</p>
<p>NJ looks to be a mess&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BonBon</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/08/02/the-blame-game-has-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-645539</link>
		<dc:creator>BonBon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 18:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/08/02/the-blame-game-has-begun/#comment-645539</guid>
		<description>Ted.  It&#039;s the states responsibility to get the job done but the federal government always has and always will kick in some money.  My knowledge from Maryland (and the Bay Bridge) is that the feds give money because it falls under their jurisdiction to keep the highway infrastructure intact.  Am I wrong?  I honestly couldn&#039;t find anything to support either position (with the exception of Peejz&#039;s link above.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted.  It&#8217;s the states responsibility to get the job done but the federal government always has and always will kick in some money.  My knowledge from Maryland (and the Bay Bridge) is that the feds give money because it falls under their jurisdiction to keep the highway infrastructure intact.  Am I wrong?  I honestly couldn&#8217;t find anything to support either position (with the exception of Peejz&#8217;s link above.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TedintheShed</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/08/02/the-blame-game-has-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-645537</link>
		<dc:creator>TedintheShed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 17:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/08/02/the-blame-game-has-begun/#comment-645537</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a state responsibilty. 

Ohio has $330 million alined this year for bridge repair and replacements alone. ODOT (The Ohio Department of Transportation) carries those repairs out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a state responsibilty. </p>
<p>Ohio has $330 million alined this year for bridge repair and replacements alone. ODOT (The Ohio Department of Transportation) carries those repairs out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snowy egret</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/08/02/the-blame-game-has-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-645530</link>
		<dc:creator>snowy egret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/08/02/the-blame-game-has-begun/#comment-645530</guid>
		<description>I figure it would,nt take long before some liberal memeber of the steupid jackas party would blame bush what a blockhead&lt;):)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I figure it would,nt take long before some liberal memeber of the steupid jackas party would blame bush what a blockhead<):)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peejz</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/08/02/the-blame-game-has-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-645527</link>
		<dc:creator>Peejz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/08/02/the-blame-game-has-begun/#comment-645527</guid>
		<description>The federal government &lt;a href=&quot;http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070803/D8QPDKKG0.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;is now providing about $40 billion a year to improve and expand &lt;/a&gt;the nation&#039;s highways and bridges...So that begs the question....

If this is a true figure:

&lt;blockquote&gt;More than 70,000 bridges across the country are rated structurally deficient like the span that collapsed in Minneapolis, and engineers estimate repairing them all would take at least a generation and cost more than $188 billion.

That works out to at least $9.4 billion a year over 20 years, according to the American Society of Civil Engineers.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Why are the bridges not in good shape?  Where is the money going?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The federal government <a href="http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070803/D8QPDKKG0.html" rel="nofollow">is now providing about $40 billion a year to improve and expand </a>the nation&#8217;s highways and bridges&#8230;So that begs the question&#8230;.</p>
<p>If this is a true figure:</p>
<blockquote><p>More than 70,000 bridges across the country are rated structurally deficient like the span that collapsed in Minneapolis, and engineers estimate repairing them all would take at least a generation and cost more than $188 billion.</p>
<p>That works out to at least $9.4 billion a year over 20 years, according to the American Society of Civil Engineers.</p></blockquote>
<p>Why are the bridges not in good shape?  Where is the money going?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthias Roggenbuck</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/08/02/the-blame-game-has-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-645524</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthias Roggenbuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 13:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/08/02/the-blame-game-has-begun/#comment-645524</guid>
		<description>24-
Regarding your aspect, that due to the various stages the fund has to go through my feeling is, that you have an average loss as in every public administration structure, but I would guess that the same waste of money (by mismanagement) takes also place in the military and so you have that drawback at both sides.

I think, that from a government perspective both areas (traffic &amp; defense) and its budget have the purpose to guarantee the safety of the citizens (though I don&#039;t share that view for the war-case). Unfortunately I guess, that your government overestimated the dangerpotential related to the &quot;war on terror&quot; and underestimated the &quot;war against rust&quot;. I mean- this kind of collapse can happen anywhere else at each moment again...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>24-<br />
Regarding your aspect, that due to the various stages the fund has to go through my feeling is, that you have an average loss as in every public administration structure, but I would guess that the same waste of money (by mismanagement) takes also place in the military and so you have that drawback at both sides.</p>
<p>I think, that from a government perspective both areas (traffic &amp; defense) and its budget have the purpose to guarantee the safety of the citizens (though I don&#8217;t share that view for the war-case). Unfortunately I guess, that your government overestimated the dangerpotential related to the &#8220;war on terror&#8221; and underestimated the &#8220;war against rust&#8221;. I mean- this kind of collapse can happen anywhere else at each moment again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sasha</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/08/02/the-blame-game-has-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-645521</link>
		<dc:creator>Sasha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 13:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/08/02/the-blame-game-has-begun/#comment-645521</guid>
		<description>21:  MR, one reason you won&#039;t find anyone asking that question is that going to war presupposes one has the resources and equipment to achieve the set objectives.

As for the 35W, the state is responsible for upkeep of its roads, and that applies to the interstates as well. The funds can come from the federal level, but each state sets its priorities in constructing and maintaining those roads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>21:  MR, one reason you won&#8217;t find anyone asking that question is that going to war presupposes one has the resources and equipment to achieve the set objectives.</p>
<p>As for the 35W, the state is responsible for upkeep of its roads, and that applies to the interstates as well. The funds can come from the federal level, but each state sets its priorities in constructing and maintaining those roads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

