Comments on: Big Shocker: Clinton campaign kills negative story

By: San Francisco Liberal

San Francisco Liberal — Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:19:18 +0000

#5…wrong again, guy.

I don’t advocate censorship at all.

Let the crappy show be shown…I don’t care.

Just put a disclaimer in front of it saying that the show is mostly fiction.

As far as DVD sales…I can only image Wal-Mart carrying this kind of garbage.

By: snowy egret

snowy egret — Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:57:43 +0000

Of course thats where her flying monkeys some in:-$

By: Robert

Robert — Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:48:16 +0000

A HilLiary Klinton Presidency would bring Marxism to the White House.

By: PCD

PCD — Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:06:22 +0000

4, SFL, all for censorship when you’re doing the censoring, eh? You are just another totalitarian trying to look all warm, fuzzy, and loving when you aren’t. The truth hurts you libs, and we all notice when you take a powder because you are on the wrong side of an issue and can’t admit it.

By: San Francisco Liberal

San Francisco Liberal — Tue, 25 Sep 2007 05:15:27 +0000

Boring.

The “path to 9/11″ show sucked.

By: FrmrArtyOffcr

FrmrArtyOffcr — Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:52:10 +0000

Funny isn’t it that the “Path to 9/11″ miniseries that the Clintons fought so hard to suppress hasn’t been released on video, nor is it slated to be. Despite being the highest rated program for the nights it aired. Normally the DVD would’ve been out within 90 days for a miniseries that popular, but it isn’t even scheduled for release, much to the chagrin of the writer/director who is slated to receive a substantial percentage of the DVD sales.

By: Pam

Pam — Tue, 25 Sep 2007 01:57:57 +0000

What is the ‘this’ that you are referring to?

By: Rick

Rick — Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:29:46 +0000

And this is different from Republicans as a whole, how?