Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Benjamin Franklin

Andrew Rosenthal Emplains Why The New York Times Can’t Be Taken Seriously

By: Pam On: Sep/29/07 - 4 Comments

I would defy anyone to label Maureen Dowd by party affiliation or ideology. I’ve known her and worked closely with her for 20 years and I can’t tell you the answer to either one – Andrew Rosenthal, editorial page editor of The New York Times

Oh Mark, that made me laugh until I cried! Here are some other gems from Andrew:

The news report produced by the news staff of The Times is the heart and soul of this newspaper. Its mission is to bring our readers the best reported, best written, most carefully edited and most attractively produced report on paper and on the Internet, founded on the principle that the role of the newsroom is to provide a dispassionate accounting of events, free of political or ideological coloration.

got that all you naysayers…free of ideological coloration! Please continue Andrew:

We are passionate opponents of all forms of authoritarian behavior by the federal government.

Posted on: September 29, 2007 |

Posted in: Liberal Media

4 Responses to “Andrew Rosenthal Emplains Why The New York Times Can’t Be Taken Seriously”

  1. PCD
    September 29, 2007 - 10:11 AM on September 29th, 2007

    Andrew is a joke. Anyone can point out the biases of the NYTimes and they not only do nothing to correct the problem, THEY REINFORCE THE BIASES!

  2. Robert
    September 29, 2007 - 10:51 AM on September 29th, 2007

    The only thing that can correct the NYT is when the treasonous rag goes BK. Then maybe someone can come in and rebuild it.

    The Leftist idiot, Sulzburger, that runs it now is running it right into the ground.

  3. Right Voices
    October 19, 2007 - 10:05 PM on October 19th, 2007

    Take The New York Times’ Employee Entrance Exam

    ABC News tells us: How The New York Times Fell Apart Once the Paper of Record, the Newspaper Now has Investors Bailing. Why?
    As hard as may be for younger readers of this column to believe, twenty years ago, the New York Times was unquestionably the ne…

  4. Right Voices
    October 22, 2007 - 08:05 AM on October 22nd, 2007

    First It Was Rupert And Now It’s Drudge..The NYT’s Investigates

    Page one placement to boot! Keep in mind that the NYT’s went into cardiac arrest upon hearing the news of Murdoch’s plan to buy the Wall Street Journal, and it won’t be hard to see why they are going after Matt Drudge of The Drudge R…

Leave a Reply

Right Voices uses Gravatar to display individual comment author icons. If you'd like your own icon next to your name, then go to Gravatar.com and sign up - it's easy!