Comments on: Poll: 27% of Republicans Would Vote for Pro-Life Third Party Instead of Giuliani http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/04/poll-27-of-republicans-would-vote-for-pro-life-third-party-instead-of-giuliani/ in all matter of opinion, our adversaries are insane. Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:20:40 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: TedintheShed http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/04/poll-27-of-republicans-would-vote-for-pro-life-third-party-instead-of-giuliani/comment-page-1/#comment-658317 TedintheShed Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:20:29 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/04/poll-27-of-republicans-would-vote-for-pro-life-third-party-instead-of-giuliani/#comment-658317 Oh, and with that all said I will have to bow to SFL's foresight on this one and say he was right. Because of this, Hillary is more than likely going to be the next President, unless something radical happens and the Republicans can regain the support of the Radical Right Christian Fundies. Oh, and with that all said I will have to bow to SFL’s foresight on this one and say he was right. Because of this, Hillary is more than likely going to be the next President, unless something radical happens and the Republicans can regain the support of the Radical Right Christian Fundies.

]]> By: TedintheShed http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/04/poll-27-of-republicans-would-vote-for-pro-life-third-party-instead-of-giuliani/comment-page-1/#comment-658314 TedintheShed Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:13:44 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/04/poll-27-of-republicans-would-vote-for-pro-life-third-party-instead-of-giuliani/#comment-658314 "Times are moving forward, not backward." No, they aren't. That's the point. When neither party presents viable candidates, this is the result. IMO, that's moving backwards. "He says that Rudy's record isn't good in NYC?" No, he said his record appointing conservative judges in NYC isn't good. "He says it's difficult to explain? Then maybe he should just shut his mouth until he can." Yes he did, but I understood what he was saying. While I don't agree with many of his viewpoints, I do admire the man for taking a stand on what he sees as the central issue of his lifetime- abortion. No- I want Mr. Dobson and all others like him to keep talking even if I don't agree with what he said. Perhaps the Republicans will return to being conservatives. I think we'd all be better off that way. “Times are moving forward, not backward.”

No, they aren’t. That’s the point. When neither party presents viable candidates, this is the result. IMO, that’s moving backwards.

“He says that Rudy’s record isn’t good in NYC?”

No, he said his record appointing conservative judges in NYC isn’t good.

“He says it’s difficult to explain? Then maybe he should just shut his mouth until he can.”

Yes he did, but I understood what he was saying. While I don’t agree with many of his viewpoints, I do admire the man for taking a stand on what he sees as the central issue of his lifetime- abortion.

No- I want Mr. Dobson and all others like him to keep talking even if I don’t agree with what he said. Perhaps the Republicans will return to being conservatives.

I think we’d all be better off that way.

]]> By: Pam http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/04/poll-27-of-republicans-would-vote-for-pro-life-third-party-instead-of-giuliani/comment-page-1/#comment-658276 Pam Tue, 09 Oct 2007 12:22:35 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/04/poll-27-of-republicans-would-vote-for-pro-life-third-party-instead-of-giuliani/#comment-658276 Well Ted, just remember that this isn't the 70's any longer and this country can't afford the luxury of sitting through it and then hoping for a second coming of Ronald Reagan. Times are moving forward, not backward. I find him to be a hypocrite on his entire platform. He is passionate on prolife, yet will throw backing behind a radical pro-choice candidate? Somehow he thinks that if she gets in, the conservative movement can fight any legislation, yet if Rudy get in, there will be no fight? He is out of touch with the conservative base. He cited municipal judges as a basis for who Rudy would pick for S.C.? Seriously? That is what he has to go by? Were they all bad choices? How do they stack up against the pick that are in place by the Dems? He says that Rudy's record isn't good in NYC? He and those he hired, turned the city around and made it a safer place to be. He says it's difficult to explain? Then maybe he should just shut his mouth until he can. Well Ted, just remember that this isn’t the 70’s any longer and this country can’t afford the luxury of sitting through it and then hoping for a second coming of Ronald Reagan. Times are moving forward, not backward.

I find him to be a hypocrite on his entire platform. He is passionate on prolife, yet will throw backing behind a radical pro-choice candidate? Somehow he thinks that if she gets in, the conservative movement can fight any legislation, yet if Rudy get in, there will be no fight? He is out of touch with the conservative base.

He cited municipal judges as a basis for who Rudy would pick for S.C.? Seriously? That is what he has to go by? Were they all bad choices? How do they stack up against the pick that are in place by the Dems?

He says that Rudy’s record isn’t good in NYC? He and those he hired, turned the city around and made it a safer place to be.

He says it’s difficult to explain? Then maybe he should just shut his mouth until he can.

]]> By: TedintheShed http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/04/poll-27-of-republicans-would-vote-for-pro-life-third-party-instead-of-giuliani/comment-page-1/#comment-658213 TedintheShed Tue, 09 Oct 2007 04:43:06 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/04/poll-27-of-republicans-would-vote-for-pro-life-third-party-instead-of-giuliani/#comment-658213 I saw Dobson on Hannity and Colmes this evening- the man basically said that speaking strickly for himself and not Focus on the Family under no circumstance would he vote for Guiliani. He may be nuts, but I am beginning to think that four years of Hillary screwing things up so horribly that not even the media can smooth it over (like the Carter era) is what this country needs. I just might vote for sHillary myself. I saw Dobson on Hannity and Colmes this evening- the man basically said that speaking strickly for himself and not Focus on the Family under no circumstance would he vote for Guiliani.

He may be nuts, but I am beginning to think that four years of Hillary screwing things up so horribly that not even the media can smooth it over (like the Carter era) is what this country needs.

I just might vote for sHillary myself.

]]> By: FrmrArtyOffcr http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/04/poll-27-of-republicans-would-vote-for-pro-life-third-party-instead-of-giuliani/comment-page-1/#comment-657520 FrmrArtyOffcr Sat, 06 Oct 2007 05:30:29 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/04/poll-27-of-republicans-would-vote-for-pro-life-third-party-instead-of-giuliani/#comment-657520 I heard Dobson on the Sean Hannity show today. The man is nuts. While I can appreciate a man who believes he should vote with his principles, I can tell him from experience that backing a pointless third party candidacy will put Hillary in the White House for at least four years. Four Years during which this country could be irrepairably shoved into a downward spiral towards becoming a third world S%^thole just like our southern neighbor. Four years which will include pointless investigations, criminal activity, an enormous increase in tax rates, and a massive loss of liberty. Liberties that once lost might require another revolution to regain. He and his ilk need to understand that they either vote the closest candidate or get the one that's furthest away. After living through one Clinton presidency after voting for Perot, any third party candidate other than Jesse Ventura would be hard pressed to get my vote. Jesse might actually be able to muster enough support to win on a third party ticket. He's got great credentials. Former Navy Seal, great name recognition, great face recognition, published author, and did a pretty good job as governor from all I've heard. I heard Dobson on the Sean Hannity show today. The man is nuts. While I can appreciate a man who believes he should vote with his principles, I can tell him from experience that backing a pointless third party candidacy will put Hillary in the White House for at least four years. Four Years during which this country could be irrepairably shoved into a downward spiral towards becoming a third world S%^thole just like our southern neighbor. Four years which will include pointless investigations, criminal activity, an enormous increase in tax rates, and a massive loss of liberty. Liberties that once lost might require another revolution to regain. He and his ilk need to understand that they either vote the closest candidate or get the one that’s furthest away.

After living through one Clinton presidency after voting for Perot, any third party candidate other than Jesse Ventura would be hard pressed to get my vote. Jesse might actually be able to muster enough support to win on a third party ticket. He’s got great credentials. Former Navy Seal, great name recognition, great face recognition, published author, and did a pretty good job as governor from all I’ve heard.

]]> By: San Francisco Liberal http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/04/poll-27-of-republicans-would-vote-for-pro-life-third-party-instead-of-giuliani/comment-page-1/#comment-657491 San Francisco Liberal Sat, 06 Oct 2007 02:32:41 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/04/poll-27-of-republicans-would-vote-for-pro-life-third-party-instead-of-giuliani/#comment-657491 There are 34,000 Registered Republicans here in San Francisco, you know. (!) There are 34,000 Registered Republicans here in San Francisco, you know.

(!)

]]> By: Robert http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/04/poll-27-of-republicans-would-vote-for-pro-life-third-party-instead-of-giuliani/comment-page-1/#comment-657467 Robert Sat, 06 Oct 2007 00:18:19 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/04/poll-27-of-republicans-would-vote-for-pro-life-third-party-instead-of-giuliani/#comment-657467 "just who voted for those supervisors, the tooth fairy, the turf monster, the promised spending cuts by the 84 Democrat congress?" A bunch of mentally-ill, spiritually-diseased, drug-addled human debris. “just who voted for those supervisors, the tooth fairy, the turf monster, the promised spending cuts by the 84 Democrat congress?”

A bunch of mentally-ill, spiritually-diseased, drug-addled human debris.

]]> By: San Francisco Liberal http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/04/poll-27-of-republicans-would-vote-for-pro-life-third-party-instead-of-giuliani/comment-page-1/#comment-657456 San Francisco Liberal Fri, 05 Oct 2007 23:41:52 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/04/poll-27-of-republicans-would-vote-for-pro-life-third-party-instead-of-giuliani/#comment-657456 15, Who voted for them?! Uhhh, the people in their districts did. 15, Who voted for them?!

Uhhh, the people in their districts did.

]]> By: PCD http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/04/poll-27-of-republicans-would-vote-for-pro-life-third-party-instead-of-giuliani/comment-page-1/#comment-657378 PCD Fri, 05 Oct 2007 15:00:26 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/04/poll-27-of-republicans-would-vote-for-pro-life-third-party-instead-of-giuliani/#comment-657378 14, just who voted for those supervisors, the tooth fairy, the turf monster, the promised spending cuts by the 84 Democrat congress? 14, just who voted for those supervisors, the tooth fairy, the turf monster, the promised spending cuts by the 84 Democrat congress?

]]> By: San Francisco Liberal http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/04/poll-27-of-republicans-would-vote-for-pro-life-third-party-instead-of-giuliani/comment-page-1/#comment-657377 San Francisco Liberal Fri, 05 Oct 2007 14:58:27 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/04/poll-27-of-republicans-would-vote-for-pro-life-third-party-instead-of-giuliani/#comment-657377 "Your people are trying to ban that very event" ----------------- I didn't vote for them, and I certainly don't support the banning of the Blue Angles during Fleet Week. Not every SF Liberal was for the ban...it failed by a 7-2 vote. “Your people are trying to ban that very event”

—————–

I didn’t vote for them, and I certainly don’t support the banning of the Blue Angles during Fleet Week.

Not every SF Liberal was for the ban…it failed by a 7-2 vote.

]]>