<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Updated: LOST Is The Appropriate Description For The Justification For: Law of the Sea Treaty; The Navy Approves?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/29/lost-is-the-appropriate-description-for-the-justification-for-law-of-the-sea-treaty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/29/lost-is-the-appropriate-description-for-the-justification-for-law-of-the-sea-treaty/</link>
	<description>in all matter of opinion, our adversaries are insane.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 14:43:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrmrArtyOffcr</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/29/lost-is-the-appropriate-description-for-the-justification-for-law-of-the-sea-treaty/comment-page-1/#comment-666654</link>
		<dc:creator>FrmrArtyOffcr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 05:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/29/lost-is-the-appropriate-description-for-the-justification-for-law-of-the-sea-treaty/#comment-666654</guid>
		<description>Sounds to me like the Admiral thinks that this is a maritime version of the Geneva Conventions on land warfare. While I&#039;m certain that me may have concerned himself with that aspect of this, treaties with the UN or any organization that degrades US sovereignty are bad ideas. That is the reason why the Democrats will try to pass it, it&#039;s bad for the US military and intelligence community. Remember this is the same party that allows and has members who support someone who claims that he saw and communicated with an UFO recently to run for President. The same person who wants to have a cabinet level &quot;Department of Peace&quot; to counter the Department of Defense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds to me like the Admiral thinks that this is a maritime version of the Geneva Conventions on land warfare. While I&#8217;m certain that me may have concerned himself with that aspect of this, treaties with the UN or any organization that degrades US sovereignty are bad ideas. That is the reason why the Democrats will try to pass it, it&#8217;s bad for the US military and intelligence community. Remember this is the same party that allows and has members who support someone who claims that he saw and communicated with an UFO recently to run for President. The same person who wants to have a cabinet level &#8220;Department of Peace&#8221; to counter the Department of Defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right Voices &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ALERT:American sovereignty on the line; LOST MOVES TO SENATE FOR A VOTE</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/29/lost-is-the-appropriate-description-for-the-justification-for-law-of-the-sea-treaty/comment-page-1/#comment-666479</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Voices &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ALERT:American sovereignty on the line; LOST MOVES TO SENATE FOR A VOTE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/29/lost-is-the-appropriate-description-for-the-justification-for-law-of-the-sea-treaty/#comment-666479</guid>
		<description>[...] I blogged about this on Monday. LOST must be stopped! Michelle has a great roundup: Update 11:44am Eastern. The vote: 17-4. LOST moves to the Senate floor. Stay tuned. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I blogged about this on Monday. LOST must be stopped! Michelle has a great roundup: Update 11:44am Eastern. The vote: 17-4. LOST moves to the Senate floor. Stay tuned. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gene</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/29/lost-is-the-appropriate-description-for-the-justification-for-law-of-the-sea-treaty/comment-page-1/#comment-664433</link>
		<dc:creator>gene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/29/lost-is-the-appropriate-description-for-the-justification-for-law-of-the-sea-treaty/#comment-664433</guid>
		<description>I have read many articles as to why we shouldn&#039;t sign this (so called) treaty but have not read one saying why we should. If it doesn&#039;t aid this country in any way, why would we agree to it? It also boggles my mind why the US Navy thinks it&#039;s such a good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read many articles as to why we shouldn&#8217;t sign this (so called) treaty but have not read one saying why we should. If it doesn&#8217;t aid this country in any way, why would we agree to it? It also boggles my mind why the US Navy thinks it&#8217;s such a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/29/lost-is-the-appropriate-description-for-the-justification-for-law-of-the-sea-treaty/comment-page-1/#comment-664413</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/29/lost-is-the-appropriate-description-for-the-justification-for-law-of-the-sea-treaty/#comment-664413</guid>
		<description>If viewed as a threat to our sovereignty, you can bet the Democrats will try to push it through:-w</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If viewed as a threat to our sovereignty, you can bet the Democrats will try to push it through:-w</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TedintheShed</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/29/lost-is-the-appropriate-description-for-the-justification-for-law-of-the-sea-treaty/comment-page-1/#comment-664389</link>
		<dc:creator>TedintheShed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/29/lost-is-the-appropriate-description-for-the-justification-for-law-of-the-sea-treaty/#comment-664389</guid>
		<description>Per th Reagan Diaries, this kept President Reagan up at night- he rightfully viewed it as a huge threat to our sovereignty.

It is even bigger than the border issue folks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Per th Reagan Diaries, this kept President Reagan up at night- he rightfully viewed it as a huge threat to our sovereignty.</p>
<p>It is even bigger than the border issue folks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snowy egret</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/29/lost-is-the-appropriate-description-for-the-justification-for-law-of-the-sea-treaty/comment-page-1/#comment-664388</link>
		<dc:creator>snowy egret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2007/10/29/lost-is-the-appropriate-description-for-the-justification-for-law-of-the-sea-treaty/#comment-664388</guid>
		<description>We dont want or need the LOST treaty is nothing more then a attempt by the sinister UN to control the world this is one treaty that should be deep sixed:-ss</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We dont want or need the LOST treaty is nothing more then a attempt by the sinister UN to control the world this is one treaty that should be deep sixed:-ss</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

