Comments on: Reid: I’ll Show You Mister Macho Pen..There’ll Be No Recess …. http://rightvoices.com/2007/11/16/reid-ill-show-you-mister-macho-pentherell-be-no-recess/ in all matter of opinion, our adversaries are insane. Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:05:09 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Robert http://rightvoices.com/2007/11/16/reid-ill-show-you-mister-macho-pentherell-be-no-recess/comment-page-1/#comment-672664 Robert Sat, 17 Nov 2007 18:28:49 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2007/11/16/reid-ill-show-you-mister-macho-pentherell-be-no-recess/#comment-672664 Pam thanks for digging up those links (#4). You see SFL (#3) Reid did win reelection overwhelmingly. But since then he has become such a turd many of those who voted for him are disgusted and cannot wait for the next election to dump him. You see, I research these things in advance. I know before I post my opinion, or rhetoric, if it is true. Pam thanks for digging up those links (#4). You see SFL (#3) Reid did win reelection overwhelmingly. But since then he has become such a turd many of those who voted for him are disgusted and cannot wait for the next election to dump him.

You see, I research these things in advance. I know before I post my opinion, or rhetoric, if it is true.

]]> By: BG http://rightvoices.com/2007/11/16/reid-ill-show-you-mister-macho-pentherell-be-no-recess/comment-page-1/#comment-672622 BG Sat, 17 Nov 2007 14:18:54 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2007/11/16/reid-ill-show-you-mister-macho-pentherell-be-no-recess/#comment-672622 The problem for FSOs in Iraq was not because of the volunteers. There aren't supposed to be volunteers. It's required of their jobs. They get paid alot and that is why. Bush should have fired those FSOs who refused to honor their contract and replaced them with recess, statutory, or whatever other type of appointment works. Congress is going tosay they control those appointments because they are worried about their federal employee constituuents and term limits for them and themsleves. Because Bush and Rice are cowards, FSOs were allowed to violate their contracts and not be fired; they will continue to violate their contracts because it was allowed once.b-(:-?#:-s The problem for FSOs in Iraq was not because of the volunteers. There aren’t supposed to be volunteers. It’s required of their jobs. They get paid alot and that is why.

Bush should have fired those FSOs who refused to honor their contract and replaced them with recess, statutory, or whatever other type of appointment works. Congress is going tosay they control those appointments because they are worried about their federal employee constituuents and term limits for them and themsleves.

Because Bush and Rice are cowards, FSOs were allowed to violate their contracts and not be fired; they will continue to violate their contracts because it was allowed once.b-(:-?#:-s

]]> By: FrmrArtyOffcr http://rightvoices.com/2007/11/16/reid-ill-show-you-mister-macho-pentherell-be-no-recess/comment-page-1/#comment-672570 FrmrArtyOffcr Sat, 17 Nov 2007 06:52:23 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2007/11/16/reid-ill-show-you-mister-macho-pentherell-be-no-recess/#comment-672570 Hmmm, Try as I might, I can't find where in the Constitution it requires the President to nominate anyone from the opposition party to ANY COMMISSION. Therefore, Harry Reid's actions is once again in direct conflict with the Constitution and hence UNCONSTITUTIONAL. The President was elected to head up the Executive branch. Harry and Nancy were selected to sort of head the LEGISLATIVE branch. They have NO ability to dictate appointments. It's called Separation of Powers. I know they've heard the phrase, I've heard them spout it. Too damn bad they don't seem to know what it means. Hmmm, Try as I might, I can’t find where in the Constitution it requires the President to nominate anyone from the opposition party to ANY COMMISSION. Therefore, Harry Reid’s actions is once again in direct conflict with the Constitution and hence UNCONSTITUTIONAL. The President was elected to head up the Executive branch. Harry and Nancy were selected to sort of head the LEGISLATIVE branch. They have NO ability to dictate appointments. It’s called Separation of Powers. I know they’ve heard the phrase, I’ve heard them spout it. Too damn bad they don’t seem to know what it means.

]]> By: Pam http://rightvoices.com/2007/11/16/reid-ill-show-you-mister-macho-pentherell-be-no-recess/comment-page-1/#comment-672527 Pam Sat, 17 Nov 2007 02:39:17 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2007/11/16/reid-ill-show-you-mister-macho-pentherell-be-no-recess/#comment-672527 <a href="http://www.elynews.com/articles/2007/10/24/news/news12.txt" rel="nofollow">Sen. Harry Reid drops in Nevada poll</a> <blockquote>Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's appeal among Nevadans has plunged dramatically in a new Las Vegas Review-Journal poll, which finds him viewed unfavorably by most likely voters in his home state. Reid is still slightly more well-liked than Gov. Jim Gibbons. <strong>Both the Democratic senator and the Republican governor are less favorably viewed than President Bush.</strong></blockquote> Sen. Harry Reid drops in Nevada poll

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s appeal among Nevadans has plunged dramatically in a new Las Vegas Review-Journal poll, which finds him viewed unfavorably by most likely voters in his home state.

Reid is still slightly more well-liked than Gov. Jim Gibbons. Both the Democratic senator and the Republican governor are less favorably viewed than President Bush.

]]> By: San Francisco Liberal http://rightvoices.com/2007/11/16/reid-ill-show-you-mister-macho-pentherell-be-no-recess/comment-page-1/#comment-672524 San Francisco Liberal Sat, 17 Nov 2007 02:31:37 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2007/11/16/reid-ill-show-you-mister-macho-pentherell-be-no-recess/#comment-672524 You got some proof from that statement, Robert? In 2004, in his last Senate race, Harry Reid got 494,805 which was 61% of the vote. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Reid#Electoral_history You have something better than that regarding his popularity in his home state? You got some proof from that statement, Robert?

In 2004, in his last Senate race, Harry Reid got 494,805 which was 61% of the vote.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Reid#Electoral_history

You have something better than that regarding his popularity in his home state?

]]> By: Robert http://rightvoices.com/2007/11/16/reid-ill-show-you-mister-macho-pentherell-be-no-recess/comment-page-1/#comment-672516 Robert Sat, 17 Nov 2007 02:05:33 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2007/11/16/reid-ill-show-you-mister-macho-pentherell-be-no-recess/#comment-672516 The majority of voters in Reid's District now despise him and cannot wait for the next election to throw his ass out... The majority of voters in Reid’s District now despise him and cannot wait for the next election to throw his ass out…

]]> By: snowy egret http://rightvoices.com/2007/11/16/reid-ill-show-you-mister-macho-pentherell-be-no-recess/comment-page-1/#comment-672473 snowy egret Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:49:16 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2007/11/16/reid-ill-show-you-mister-macho-pentherell-be-no-recess/#comment-672473 So what else will this turkey do to get his notority as bad as it is now?:-w So what else will this turkey do to get his notority as bad as it is now?:-w

]]>