Yuck,Yuck, and more Yuck! Were the prayers answered? Was it the doggie daycare?

Good news? Mitt and Fred still look good… Bad news? Rudy got beat by Ron!

Observation: Look at the number of voters..that is ridiculous!

10 Responses to “YUCK:Iowa Goes With Huckabee”

1. Democrats @ 2008 Presidential Election » YUCK:Iowa Goes With Huckabee
   January 3, 2008 - 08:31 PM on January 3rd, 2008

   [...] Right Voices added an interesting post today on YUCK:Iowa Goes With HuckabeeHere’s a small reading [...]

2. San Francisco Liberal
   January 4, 2008 - 01:07 AM on January 4th, 2008

   Nelson voice: “HA HA!”

3. PCD
   January 4, 2008 - 07:35 AM on January 4th, 2008

   2, SFL, Huck won’t get the nomination. It will either be Fred or Romney. The Democrats will lose the WH. Will that induce you to move to the LIBERAL nirvanas of Cuba or Zimbabwe?

4. Toasted Tofu
   January 4, 2008 - 08:55 AM on January 4th, 2008

   Right, Pam. The republicans will nominate the the flip-flopper with the funky underwear or the second-rate actor with one foot in the grave by all looks of it.

   No, the Huckster is perfect for the Republican party. Now you have a candidate who REALLY IS a religious conservative. You should be thrilled!

   Ditto SFL: “Ha Ha.”

5. PCD
   January 4, 2008 - 09:37 AM on January 4th, 2008

   4, ditto the question to you tofu. Will you move to one of the Liberal Paradises, Cuba or Zimbabwe, when the GOP wins the White House in 08?

6. Toasted Tofu
   January 4, 2008 - 01:04 PM on January 4th, 2008

   5- only if you agree to move to one of the Conservative Oases, like Saudi Arabia or Pakistan, if the Dems win the White House this year.

7. PCD
   January 4, 2008 - 02:50 PM on January 4th, 2008

   7, How about I move next door to you?

8. PCD
   January 4, 2008 - 02:50 PM on January 4th, 2008

   6, How about I move next door to you?

9. San Francisco Liberal
   January 4, 2008 - 08:26 PM on January 4th, 2008

   Yeah, seriously, Fred will NOT win the nomination. He’s in the single digits and is already an “also-ran”.

   The Righties at FreeRepublic.com sure do like him, though.

   As for Romney, its unlikely he’ll get nominated, IMHO.

10. FrmrArtyOffcr
    January 4, 2008 - 11:29 PM on January 4th, 2008

    At this point in time, about the only candidate that I’d count as out is the ones who have already thrown in the towel, i.e. Tancredo, Dodd and Byden. None really had the support necessary to make a run for it, but were able to convince enough people to throw away their money.

    Ron Paul is bringing in a lot of cash, and has some virulent supporters. Too bad some of his biggest talking points are simply impossible to accomplish. The wouldn’t be possible if he were elected emperor let alone president.

    I personally can’t support McCain over Thompson, Romney, Huckabee, or Rudy. That’s sad considering I voted for him for the Senate. My personal order of preference would be Thompson, Rudy, Huckabee and then Romney.

    As for the Dems. I would consider Richardson. Obama is too naive about the real world (Likable but a disaster for the country like Jimmy Carter was) Edwards and Clinton are both corrupt liars wanting to push this country over the brink into another depression with the hope of turning it into a socialist country replete with ridiculous tax rates, oppressive regulations, and sky high unemployment, inflation and crime. We might be able to recover from an Obama presidency, we would potentially face a revolution under an Edwards or Clinton one. Of Course, Thomas Jefferson did say that a revolution every so often was a good thing. I’m betting he wasn’t thinking it would be against the political party that he founded.

Leave a Reply

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website

Right Voices uses Gravatar to display individual comment author icons. If you'd like your own icon next to your name, then go to Gravatar.com and sign up - it's easy!

more »

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail