Comments on: YUCK:Iowa Goes With Huckabee http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/03/yuckiowa-goes-with-huckabee/ in all matter of opinion, our adversaries are insane. Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:20:40 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: FrmrArtyOffcr http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/03/yuckiowa-goes-with-huckabee/comment-page-1/#comment-685922 FrmrArtyOffcr Sat, 05 Jan 2008 05:29:01 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/03/yuckiowa-goes-with-huckabee/#comment-685922 At this point in time, about the only candidate that I'd count as out is the ones who have already thrown in the towel, i.e. Tancredo, Dodd and Byden. None really had the support necessary to make a run for it, but were able to convince enough people to throw away their money. Ron Paul is bringing in a lot of cash, and has some virulent supporters. Too bad some of his biggest talking points are simply impossible to accomplish. The wouldn't be possible if he were elected emperor let alone president. I personally can't support McCain over Thompson, Romney, Huckabee, or Rudy. That's sad considering I voted for him for the Senate. My personal order of preference would be Thompson, Rudy, Huckabee and then Romney. As for the Dems. I would consider Richardson. Obama is too naive about the real world (Likable but a disaster for the country like Jimmy Carter was) Edwards and Clinton are both corrupt liars wanting to push this country over the brink into another depression with the hope of turning it into a socialist country replete with ridiculous tax rates, oppressive regulations, and sky high unemployment, inflation and crime. We might be able to recover from an Obama presidency, we would potentially face a revolution under an Edwards or Clinton one. Of Course, Thomas Jefferson did say that a revolution every so often was a good thing. I'm betting he wasn't thinking it would be against the political party that he founded. At this point in time, about the only candidate that I’d count as out is the ones who have already thrown in the towel, i.e. Tancredo, Dodd and Byden. None really had the support necessary to make a run for it, but were able to convince enough people to throw away their money.

Ron Paul is bringing in a lot of cash, and has some virulent supporters. Too bad some of his biggest talking points are simply impossible to accomplish. The wouldn’t be possible if he were elected emperor let alone president.

I personally can’t support McCain over Thompson, Romney, Huckabee, or Rudy. That’s sad considering I voted for him for the Senate. My personal order of preference would be Thompson, Rudy, Huckabee and then Romney.

As for the Dems. I would consider Richardson. Obama is too naive about the real world (Likable but a disaster for the country like Jimmy Carter was) Edwards and Clinton are both corrupt liars wanting to push this country over the brink into another depression with the hope of turning it into a socialist country replete with ridiculous tax rates, oppressive regulations, and sky high unemployment, inflation and crime. We might be able to recover from an Obama presidency, we would potentially face a revolution under an Edwards or Clinton one. Of Course, Thomas Jefferson did say that a revolution every so often was a good thing. I’m betting he wasn’t thinking it would be against the political party that he founded.

]]> By: San Francisco Liberal http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/03/yuckiowa-goes-with-huckabee/comment-page-1/#comment-685904 San Francisco Liberal Sat, 05 Jan 2008 02:26:42 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/03/yuckiowa-goes-with-huckabee/#comment-685904 Yeah, seriously, Fred will NOT win the nomination. He's in the single digits and is already an "also-ran". The Righties at FreeRepublic.com sure do like him, though. As for Romney, its unlikely he'll get nominated, IMHO. Yeah, seriously, Fred will NOT win the nomination. He’s in the single digits and is already an “also-ran”.

The Righties at FreeRepublic.com sure do like him, though.

As for Romney, its unlikely he’ll get nominated, IMHO.

]]> By: PCD http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/03/yuckiowa-goes-with-huckabee/comment-page-1/#comment-685859 PCD Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:50:46 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/03/yuckiowa-goes-with-huckabee/#comment-685859 6, How about I move next door to you? 6, How about I move next door to you?

]]> By: PCD http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/03/yuckiowa-goes-with-huckabee/comment-page-1/#comment-685858 PCD Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:50:31 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/03/yuckiowa-goes-with-huckabee/#comment-685858 7, How about I move next door to you? 7, How about I move next door to you?

]]> By: Toasted Tofu http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/03/yuckiowa-goes-with-huckabee/comment-page-1/#comment-685849 Toasted Tofu Fri, 04 Jan 2008 19:04:37 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/03/yuckiowa-goes-with-huckabee/#comment-685849 5- only if you agree to move to one of the Conservative Oases, like Saudi Arabia or Pakistan, if the Dems win the White House this year. 5- only if you agree to move to one of the Conservative Oases, like Saudi Arabia or Pakistan, if the Dems win the White House this year.

]]> By: PCD http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/03/yuckiowa-goes-with-huckabee/comment-page-1/#comment-685831 PCD Fri, 04 Jan 2008 15:37:45 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/03/yuckiowa-goes-with-huckabee/#comment-685831 4, ditto the question to you tofu. Will you move to one of the Liberal Paradises, Cuba or Zimbabwe, when the GOP wins the White House in 08? 4, ditto the question to you tofu. Will you move to one of the Liberal Paradises, Cuba or Zimbabwe, when the GOP wins the White House in 08?

]]> By: Toasted Tofu http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/03/yuckiowa-goes-with-huckabee/comment-page-1/#comment-685823 Toasted Tofu Fri, 04 Jan 2008 14:55:03 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/03/yuckiowa-goes-with-huckabee/#comment-685823 Right, Pam. The republicans will nominate the the flip-flopper with the funky underwear or the second-rate actor with one foot in the grave by all looks of it. No, the Huckster is perfect for the Republican party. Now you have a candidate who REALLY IS a religious conservative. You should be thrilled! :) Ditto SFL: "Ha Ha." Right, Pam. The republicans will nominate the the flip-flopper with the funky underwear or the second-rate actor with one foot in the grave by all looks of it.

No, the Huckster is perfect for the Republican party. Now you have a candidate who REALLY IS a religious conservative. You should be thrilled! :)

Ditto SFL: “Ha Ha.”

]]> By: PCD http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/03/yuckiowa-goes-with-huckabee/comment-page-1/#comment-685814 PCD Fri, 04 Jan 2008 13:35:49 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/03/yuckiowa-goes-with-huckabee/#comment-685814 2, SFL, Huck won't get the nomination. It will either be Fred or Romney. The Democrats will lose the WH. Will that induce you to move to the LIBERAL nirvanas of Cuba or Zimbabwe? 2, SFL, Huck won’t get the nomination. It will either be Fred or Romney. The Democrats will lose the WH. Will that induce you to move to the LIBERAL nirvanas of Cuba or Zimbabwe?

]]> By: San Francisco Liberal http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/03/yuckiowa-goes-with-huckabee/comment-page-1/#comment-685789 San Francisco Liberal Fri, 04 Jan 2008 07:07:05 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/03/yuckiowa-goes-with-huckabee/#comment-685789 Nelson voice: "HA HA!" Nelson voice: “HA HA!”

]]> By: Democrats @ 2008 Presidential Election » YUCK:Iowa Goes With Huckabee http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/03/yuckiowa-goes-with-huckabee/comment-page-1/#comment-685756 Democrats @ 2008 Presidential Election » YUCK:Iowa Goes With Huckabee Fri, 04 Jan 2008 02:31:04 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/03/yuckiowa-goes-with-huckabee/#comment-685756 [...] Right Voices added an interesting post today on YUCK:Iowa Goes With HuckabeeHere’s a small reading [...] [...] Right Voices added an interesting post today on YUCK:Iowa Goes With HuckabeeHere’s a small reading [...]

]]>