BUMPED&UPDATED: Voter cited by opponents of Indiana’s ID law registered in two states …. SCOTUS Not Likely To Alter/Ban Indiana Voter ID

January 9, 2008 7:47 PM
Posted By:Pam
Filed in: Supreme Court

UPDATED AND BUMPED: Voter cited by opponents of Indiana’s ID law registered in two states :

Faye Buis-Ewing, 72, who has been telling the media she is a 50-year resident of Indiana, at one point in the past few years also

claimed two states as her primary residence and received a homestead exemption on her property taxes in both states.

Monday night from her Florida home, Ewing said she and her husband Kenneth “winter in Florida and summer in Indiana.” She admitted to registering to vote in both states, but stressed that she¹s never voted in Florida. She also has a Florida driver’s license, but when she tried to use it as her photo ID in the Indiana elections in November 2006, poll workers wouldn’t accept it.

Subsequently, Ewing became a sort-of poster child for the opposition when the Indiana League of Women Voters (ILWV) told media that the problems Ewing had voting that day shows why the high court should strike it down……..
…..
I¹m confused’

According to Ewing and Ann Nucatola, public information director for the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, Ewing surrendered her Indiana driver¹s license in 2000, when she moved to Florida and obtained her Florida license. Nucatola said that a driver must have a Florida address to obtain a Florida driver¹s license.

“And if they own property in two states they have to get a license that says ‘valid in Florida only,’” Nucatola said.

Ewing said Monday that her license is a “regular” one that she uses in both states. She renewed it in 2007 on a Punta Gorda, Fla. address.

At the Charlotte County, Fla. voter registration office, Sandy Wharton, vote qualifying office manager, said Ewing registered to vote in Charlotte County on Sept. 18, 2002, and signed an oath that she was a Florida resident and understood that falsifying the voter application was a third-degree felony punishable by prison and a fine up to $5,000. Wharton said her office checked Ewing’s Florida residency and qualified her on Oct. 2, 2002. On Oct. 4, 2002, they mailed her Florida voter card to her, to the West Lafayette, Ind. address that Ewing gave as a mailing address.

However, Ewing didn’t vote in Florida that year, nor has she ever voted in Charlotte County, Wharton said. But, just a month after receiving her Florida voter card, she did vote in the November 2002 elections in Tippecanoe County, Ind., according to Heather Maddox, co-director of elections and registration in Tippecanoe.

Ewing confirmed that she is registered in both states to vote, but at first said the Florida registration came automatically with her driver’s license. She repeatedly denied signing the oath on the Florida application. She also said Indiana mailed her an absentee ballot, but she didn’t use it or vote that year.

However, Heather Maddox, co-director of election registration in Tippecanoe County, said Ewing voted in Indiana in 2002, 2003 and 2004, before the Indiana ID law took effect in 2005.

When informed that the Florida voter office said she’d registered personally in 2002 for a Florida voter card, and that this newspaper had a copy of her application, Ewing said, “Well, why did I do that? I¹m confused. I can’t recall.” She reiterated that, even though she’s registered in two states, she only votes in Indiana, adding that she does have a car plated in Florida.

That doesn’t satisfy Florida officials.

“She can only be registered to vote in the place where she claims residency,² Wharton said. “You can’t be registered in two states. She has to claim one place or the other.”

Ordinarily when someone registers to vote in Florida, the state informs the election board where the applicant was previously registered. But according to Wharton, Ewing did not inform Florida that she was ever registered to vote anywhere else.

“She signed an oath saying she was a qualified elector and a legal resident of Florida,” Wharton said. “And the space where she was supposed to tell us where she was previously registered, she left blank.”

Homestead
A check with Charlotte County, Fla.’s online property tax records shows that Ewing owns property there. One requirement in Florida to claim homestead is to show a valid voter ID or sign an affidavit of residency – which she did when she applied for her voter card there. She claimed a homestead exemption on the Florida property in 2003 – the same time she was claiming a homestead exemption on property she owned in Indiana, according to Tippecanoe deputy auditor Heather Satler. Satler said that Ewing’s Indiana exemption began in 1994 and ended in 2004, when the exemption was removed because the state discovered she wasn¹t living there.

Tuesday Ewing said the homestead “problem came up” when she married in 2002. “But that was taken care of,” she said. She also said her main residence is in Indiana, and that she pays “some” taxes in Indiana on a “small annuity” she receives.

“But I feel like I’m a victim here,” Ewing said. “I never intended to do anything wrong. I know a lot of people in Florida in this same situation – they call us ‘Snowbirds,’ you know.”

Confused? Victim? Get real! My Grandfather, a Democratic politician, was a victim of voting fraud…the Democrats made sure he voted….3 months after he died!

The Scotusblog has more…

Don:

If a woman who cheats like this — claiming permanent residence in 2 states to avoid paying property taxes (a woman I might add who can afford a summer home and a winter home) is the best the Democratic Party and its League of Women Voters subsidiary can show, then justices ought to uphold the law 9-0.

And protect my vote from being diluted by double-dipping tax cheats.

The only day in court she should get is in a criminal court to explain why she is registered to vote in 2 states.

The Evening Star story is here. The Indianapolis Star whitewash is here.

See my previous post here
H/T to Memeorandum for the links
—————————————————————————————————————–
Based on the reports coming from various sources, WaPo, CQ Politics, AJC, and the AP, it seems that the SCOTUS is poised to uphold the Indiana Voter ID Law.

Start with:

  • If one side cannot prove voter fraud and the other cannot prove a voter was unable to cast a ballot because of the law, “where do you draw the line?” Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr
  • “You want us to invalidate a statute on the ground that it’s a minor inconvenience to a small percentage of voters?” Kennedy said near the end of the lively session. Kennedy did, however, voice concern over some aspects of obtaining an ID, including the difficulty the poor have in getting the birth certificates that are needed to get photo ID.
  • And deduce what you will from this:

  • Indiana Solicitor General Thomas Fisher, who defended the law before the court, seized on the standing issue, telling the court that “we don’t have anybody in front of this court in this case who has been injured by this law.”
  • Indiana Democratic Party Chairman Dan Parker said the law is “a solution looking for a problem.” Fisher said there is a “glaring hole in the election security process,” adding that “we’ve got a problem with voter confidence.”
  • Linkfest Haven, the Blogger's Oasis
    Trackposted to Outside the Beltway, The Virtuous Republic, Blog @ MoreWhat.com, Rosemary’s Thoughts, The Random Yak, Adam’s Blog, Right Truth, Leaning Straight Up, Cao’s Blog, The Amboy Times, Conservative Cat, Pursuing Holiness, third world county, Allie is Wired, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, The World According to Carl, Celebrity Smack, The Pink Flamingo, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

  • Open Trackback Alliance
  • Use the legend to view current day Open Trackback Alliance members.

    Get the code for this blogroll

    Colbert Report
    Creative Conviction
    Daily - BIG DOG’s WEBLOG
    Daily - Blue Star Chronicles
    Daily - Conservative Cat
    Daily - Conservative Thoughts
    Daily - Don Surber
    Daily - euphoricreality.net
    Daily - Irate Nation
    Daily - Is It Just Me?
    Daily - Mike Reporter
    Daily - NIF
    Daily - Pursuing Holiness
    Daily - Stiknstein Has No Mercy
    Daily - The Dumb Ox
    Daily - The Pink Flamingo
    F. - 10ft2ft.com
    F. - Blue State Conservatives
    F. - Caos Blog
    F. - Right Wing Nation
    F. - Superuomo
    F. - The World According to Carl
    F. - Woman Honor Thyself
    F. Sa. Su. - Learning Straight Up
    M. - Mark My Words
    M. - Wake Up Americans
    M. F. - Bloggin Outloud
    M. Tu. - Third World County
    M. Tu. W. Th. F. - GM’s Corner
    M. W. F. - Perri Nelson’s Website
    Oblogatory Anecdotes
    Peakah’s Provocations
    Point Five
    Real Teen- Right on the Right
    Right Voices
    Sa. - Assorted Babble
    Sa. - Phastidio.net
    Soldiers’ Angel - Holly Aho
    Something… and Half of Something
    Su. - Otimaster
    Su. F. Sa. - The Hill Chronicles
    Su. Fr. Sa. - Publius Rendezvous
    Su. Sa. - A Tic In The Mind’s Eye
    Su. Sa. - Robinik.net
    Su. Sa. - The Right Nation
    Su. Sa. - The Uncooperative Blogger
    Su. Sa. M. - Shadowscope.com
    Su. Th. - Free Constitution
    Su. Tu. - Conservative Culture
    Su. Tu. F. Sa. - The Liberal Wrong - Wing
    Su. W. F. Sa. - Stuck On Stupid
    Th. - Diary of the Mad Pigeon
    Th. - Diva Dish
    Th. - Red_State_Blue
    Th. - The Business of America is Business
    The Tar Pit
    Tu. - Freedom Watch
    Tu. - Planck’s Constant
    Tu. - The Median Sib
    Tu. - Tor’s Rants
    Tu. Su. - Church and State
    Tu. Th. - Renaissance Blogger
    Tu. Th. - The Pirate’s Cove
    Tu. Th. Sa. - Choose Life
    Tu. W. F. Su. - Adam’s Blog
    Tu. W. Sa. - Random Thoughts Of Yet Another Military Member
    Tu. W. Th. - This May…Or Not.
    W. - Chaotic Synaptic Activity
    W. S. Su. - Urban Paradise
    W. Sa. - Gribbit’s World
    W. Sa. - Stop The ACLU
    W. Th. F. - TMH’s Bacon Bits
    WebKittyn Warbles


    Blog @ MoreWhat.com linked with MoreWhat Matters: Today’s Blog List
    Rosemary's Thoughts linked with Did God part the Red Sea?
    Planck's Constant linked with England to Arrest the Lionheart
    Big Dogs Weblog linked with Hillary Quote of the Week
    The Pink Flamingo linked with Rush Limbaugh's PMS - President McCain Syndrome
    Must Read: Success in Irregular Warfare « Wolf Pangloss linked with Must Read: Success in Irregular Warfare « Wolf Pangloss
    Fred Sez « nuke’s linked with Fred Sez « nuke’s



    11 Responses to “BUMPED&UPDATED: Voter cited by opponents of Indiana’s ID law registered in two states …. SCOTUS Not Likely To Alter/Ban Indiana Voter ID”

    TrackBack URL

    1. 1

      […] The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, The World According to Carl, Celebrity Smack, The Pink Flamingo, Right Voices, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven […]

    2. 2

      […] Flamingo, Celebrity Smack, Cao’s Blog, The Amboy Times, Conservative Cat, Pursuing Holiness, Right Voices, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven […]

    3. 3

      Rush Limbaugh’s PMS - President McCain Syndrome

      RUSHING TOWARD ONE’S WATERLOOI’ve been telling a few friends via email that Rush would hit McCain today.  I no …

    4. 4

      Hillary Quote of the Week

      This is from Hillary Clinton as she was mustering up a few fake tears for the folks:
      «I just don’t want to see us fall backwards.»
      Some might believe she meant the country or its people in the «collective» us but in reality she…

    5. PCD Says:
      5

      Excuuussssseeee MEEEEEEEE!

      If the woman has all Florida id, then she should be voting in FL and not IN. Also, Indiana ought to be going after this couple for TAX FRAUD!

    6. Pam Says:
      6

      I think the homestead item has her in some trouble! ;)

    7. 7

      England to Arrest the Lionheart

      you will not find too many Liberal blogs worrying about bloggers facing arrest for warning us against Islam

    8. snowy egret Says:
      8

      Why should anyone ever have to have ID to vote we dont want no big brother:-ss

    9. PCD Says:
      9

      8, Snowy, having experience as a Poll Worker, I never knew if the people signing in were the people they said they were. I’ve been trying to get my daughter off the local voting rolls (Dubuque, IA) as she is a resident and voting in SoCal. A dishonest Democrat could be voting in her name here. This is why we need a picture ID. You have to produce one to cash a check. Is voting more or less important than cashing a check, and is verifying the voter more or less important then verifying the ID of a check writer?

    10. 10

      Did God part the Red Sea?

      While God performed many miracles during the time Moses was trying to free the Hebrew people, was there any evidence left behind to prove that the parting of the sea actually did happen? I’ll give you some sites, and you make your own conclusions ……

    11. 11

      […] Right Voices » Blog Archive » BUMPED&UPDATED: Voter cited by opponents of Indiana’s ID law … Says: January 10th, 2008 at 4:23 am […] Trackposted to Outside the Beltway, The Virtuous Republic, Blog @ MoreWhat.com, Rosemary’s Thoughts, The Random Yak, Adam’s Blog, Right Truth, Leaning Straight Up, Cao’s Blog, The Amboy Times, Conservative Cat, Pursuing Holiness, third world county, Allie is Wired, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, The World According to Carl, Celebrity Smack, The Pink Flamingo, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe. […] […]