Comments on: Why Liberals Can’t Be Trusted With National Security http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/28/why-liberals-cant-be-trusted-with-national-security/ in all matter of opinion, our adversaries are insane. Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:20:40 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: PCD http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/28/why-liberals-cant-be-trusted-with-national-security/comment-page-1/#comment-688951 PCD Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:00:27 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/28/why-liberals-cant-be-trusted-with-national-security/#comment-688951 4, SFL and clowns like him make me want THEIR calls monitored. SFL, fair warning, if one domestic terrorist attack gets traced to a phone call from your community, YOU are going to face scrutiny and investigation that will make what happened to Clinton seem like privacy. 4, SFL and clowns like him make me want THEIR calls monitored.

SFL, fair warning, if one domestic terrorist attack gets traced to a phone call from your community, YOU are going to face scrutiny and investigation that will make what happened to Clinton seem like privacy.

]]> By: FrmrArtyOffcr http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/28/why-liberals-cant-be-trusted-with-national-security/comment-page-1/#comment-688919 FrmrArtyOffcr Wed, 30 Jan 2008 06:53:22 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/28/why-liberals-cant-be-trusted-with-national-security/#comment-688919 Yes, heaven forbid we actually listen in to calls coming from known terrorist hotbeds. We certainly have MILLIONS of law abiding citizens with no connection to terrorists making short duration calls to the Waziristan area of Pakistan, or taliban controlled parts of Afghanistan. Who knows if we do that, we might actually get the information we need to be able to stop another terrorist attack before another 3000 American citizens die. Yes, heaven forbid we actually listen in to calls coming from known terrorist hotbeds. We certainly have MILLIONS of law abiding citizens with no connection to terrorists making short duration calls to the Waziristan area of Pakistan, or taliban controlled parts of Afghanistan. Who knows if we do that, we might actually get the information we need to be able to stop another terrorist attack before another 3000 American citizens die.

]]> By: Hillary Clinton » Why Liberals Can't Be Trusted With National Security http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/28/why-liberals-cant-be-trusted-with-national-security/comment-page-1/#comment-688655 Hillary Clinton » Why Liberals Can't Be Trusted With National Security Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:24:27 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/28/why-liberals-cant-be-trusted-with-national-security/#comment-688655 [...] Right Voices wrote an interesting post today on Why Liberals Can’t Be Trusted With National SecurityHere’s a quick excerpt The Senate vote was 48-45, 12 votes short of the 60 needed to extend the law. Also on Monday, House Democratic leaders delayed until Tuesday a vote on whether to extend the law. From Michelle: "as anticipated by the nutroots, both Clinton and Obama have voted no on cloture (e.g., voted to block press on the Rockefeller-Bond FISA reform bill):5:12pm Eastern. Motion is not agreed to. Vote is 48-45:.McConnell's on the floor, next vote is on the 30-day extension:urging a no vote on cloture for [...] [...] Right Voices wrote an interesting post today on Why Liberals Can’t Be Trusted With National SecurityHere’s a quick excerpt The Senate vote was 48-45, 12 votes short of the 60 needed to extend the law. Also on Monday, House Democratic leaders delayed until Tuesday a vote on whether to extend the law. From Michelle: “as anticipated by the nutroots, both Clinton and Obama have voted no on cloture (e.g., voted to block press on the Rockefeller-Bond FISA reform bill):5:12pm Eastern. Motion is not agreed to. Vote is 48-45:.McConnell’s on the floor, next vote is on the 30-day extension:urging a no vote on cloture for [...]

]]> By: San Francisco Liberal http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/28/why-liberals-cant-be-trusted-with-national-security/comment-page-1/#comment-688646 San Francisco Liberal Mon, 28 Jan 2008 23:55:19 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/28/why-liberals-cant-be-trusted-with-national-security/#comment-688646 Umm Pam, the Senate voted to NOT extend the presidents program past Feb 1st. That's quite a rebuke, if you ask me. Umm Pam, the Senate voted to NOT extend the presidents program past Feb 1st.

That’s quite a rebuke, if you ask me.

]]> By: Pam http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/28/why-liberals-cant-be-trusted-with-national-security/comment-page-1/#comment-688638 Pam Mon, 28 Jan 2008 23:45:56 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/28/why-liberals-cant-be-trusted-with-national-security/#comment-688638 Umm SFL, the fight is only about the retroactive immunity, otherwise the bill sails through..it kinda looks like alot of Democrats agree.. Umm SFL, the fight is only about the retroactive immunity, otherwise the bill sails through..it kinda looks like alot of Democrats agree..

]]> By: Robert http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/28/why-liberals-cant-be-trusted-with-national-security/comment-page-1/#comment-688631 Robert Mon, 28 Jan 2008 23:33:13 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/28/why-liberals-cant-be-trusted-with-national-security/#comment-688631 No doubt the Democrite party leaders, upset by their recent inability to help the terrorists and ensure American defeat in Iraq, are filled with rage and hate and looking to do anything they can to cause as much damage as possible before the next election. No doubt the Democrite party leaders, upset by their recent inability to help the terrorists and ensure American defeat in Iraq, are filled with rage and hate and looking to do anything they can to cause as much damage as possible before the next election.

]]> By: San Francisco Liberal http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/28/why-liberals-cant-be-trusted-with-national-security/comment-page-1/#comment-688630 San Francisco Liberal Mon, 28 Jan 2008 23:31:00 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/01/28/why-liberals-cant-be-trusted-with-national-security/#comment-688630 "The expiration of the law is more of a political deadline than a practical one, congressional Democrats say. All existing electronic surveillance activities can continue uninterrupted for at least a year from their commencement. New domestic eavesdropping activities, however, would follow the old procedures established by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, the 30-year old law created to dictate when the government has to get permission from a secret court to tap Americans' phone and computer lines." ---------------------------- Sounds good to me. Bush is a lame duck, and a very unpopular one at that. Why should anyone want to continue his misguided policies? “The expiration of the law is more of a political deadline than a practical one, congressional Democrats say. All existing electronic surveillance activities can continue uninterrupted for at least a year from their commencement.

New domestic eavesdropping activities, however, would follow the old procedures established by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, the 30-year old law created to dictate when the government has to get permission from a secret court to tap Americans’ phone and computer lines.”

—————————-

Sounds good to me.

Bush is a lame duck, and a very unpopular one at that.

Why should anyone want to continue his misguided policies?

]]>