Libertarianism is what your mom taught you: behave yourself and don't hit your sister.
Dr. Kenneth Bisson

UPDATE: The New York Giants Win! Super Bowl Commercials..Sucked

By: Pam On: Feb/3/08 - 18 Comments

That’s what I call a football game! After hearing Tom Brady being asked what he was thankful for outside of football, one would think that his new baby would top the list, but after a prolonged pause and a general answer of ..”my family and friends”..I thought maybe he wasn’t a winner! I was right!

Let me know your reactions…So far the first 2 are duds!

Posted on: February 3, 2008 |

Posted in: National News

18 Responses to “UPDATE: The New York Giants Win! Super Bowl Commercials..Sucked”

  1. Robert
    February 3, 2008 - 08:17 PM on February 3rd, 2008

    I have been fast-forwarding through them. I luv DVR…

  2. BonBon
    February 3, 2008 - 08:25 PM on February 3rd, 2008

    Shame on you Robert. Super Bowl commercials are the best.
    [-x

    I found the etrade commercial with the baby throwing up to be pretty funny. I didn’t expect the vomit. After that I was impressed that Carville and Frist did a coke commercial together. I think that sometimes we all need to remind ourselves that while we have different views at times we all still love this country. Well, most of us anyway :)>-

  3. Pam
    February 3, 2008 - 09:20 PM on February 3rd, 2008

    Bon Bon, I liked those and the Bud ad where the horse made the team and he high fived the dalmation..

  4. San Francisco Liberal
    February 3, 2008 - 11:25 PM on February 3rd, 2008

    Woo-Hoo!! Go Giants!!

    Awesome game for sure…commercials, so-so.

    My favorite was Coke; with the Family Guy balloon vs. Wonder Dog and Charlie Brown…

  5. FrmrArtyOffcr
    February 4, 2008 - 01:24 AM on February 4th, 2008

    It’s UNDER DOG. But the commercial was pretty amusing either way.

  6. PCD
    February 4, 2008 - 06:57 AM on February 4th, 2008

    4, The Know-It-All once again proves he knows nothing.

    Woo-hoo Charlie Brown FINALLY won one, against Underdog no less!

  7. Robert
    February 4, 2008 - 10:40 AM on February 4th, 2008

    About the game, it was a great game. Normally the low-scoring games are boring, but not this one.

    Here’s why I was rooting for New York and why I am glad they won: I was getting sick of all this talk about the Pats being the greatest team in history. Well it was nonsense, and perhaps the Giants win will put that talk to rest. The ‘85 49ers would have mopped up the field with the Pats; the game would have been over early in the 3rd quarter if not by halftime. The ‘87 Bears likewise. Those were great teams!

    The Pats were lucky to be as close as they were and lucky to have taken the lead in the fourth quarter. Their first touchdown came about as a result of that stupid penalty that gave them the ball back even after they had kicked the ball away to New York; which was pure luck and not earned. If not for that, the score could easily have been 10-0 New York in the fourth quarter.

  8. PCD
    February 4, 2008 - 11:08 AM on February 4th, 2008

    Robert, the 65, 66, and 96 Packers would have beat the Pats, and I think the current Packers would have, too.

  9. BonBon
    February 4, 2008 - 11:16 AM on February 4th, 2008

    You guys sure do love your football. I’m glad all of you enjoyed the game. <:-p

  10. Robert
    February 4, 2008 - 11:20 AM on February 4th, 2008

    Bread and Circuses (ancient) = Beer and Sports (modern)!!!

  11. Robert
    February 4, 2008 - 11:32 AM on February 4th, 2008

    BonBon (#2) I watched a couple of commercials and the ones I saw were not that good. So I just FFed through the rest.

  12. BonBon
    February 4, 2008 - 12:14 PM on February 4th, 2008

    I agree. Overall they weren’t as good as they have been in the past. I did like the one with the baby though. There was something about the way he moved, then spit up that I just thought was hysterical!!!

  13. PCD
    February 4, 2008 - 01:11 PM on February 4th, 2008

    BonBon, what can you say? I grew up in Green Bay.

    On the Commercials the 3 that stand out are the Baby ones, the Coke ones, and the Budweiser one. One of the Coke ones stimulated SFL to showcase how clueless and malinformed he is.

  14. San Francisco Liberal
    February 4, 2008 - 06:26 PM on February 4th, 2008

    Malinformed?

    Here’s a link to Dictionary.com, guy…
    http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/malinformed%20

    Do you mean to say, malformed?
    http://dictionary.reference.com/search?r=2&q=malformed

    Why is it that EVERY TIME you try one of your weak-ass put-me-downs you always end up looking stupid?

    Bad “strategery”, I think…

  15. Pam
    February 4, 2008 - 06:44 PM on February 4th, 2008

    psst..Will Farrell used the word strategery while doing a skit..Bush never said that one…

  16. San Francisco Liberal
    February 4, 2008 - 06:57 PM on February 4th, 2008

    And what’s funny about that, Pam, is that the White House, in good humor, used it once or twice after that skit aired because it kind of became such a popular/funny word…

    Saying “strategery” sure helped make Farrells character look stupid…

    And so you can see why I used it in the above post…

  17. FrmrArtyOffcr
    February 6, 2008 - 12:50 AM on February 6th, 2008

    >

    Nah, Circuses were where they held the chariot races that the populace watched more to see the crashes than who won. The most modern equivalent is Nascar.

    :d

  18. PCD
    February 6, 2008 - 09:01 AM on February 6th, 2008

    17, yeah, but the Romans didn’t put restrictions on the horses used like NASCAR Restrictor plates, and the chariots were the same as used by the army, not specialized replicas.

Leave a Reply

Right Voices uses Gravatar to display individual comment author icons. If you'd like your own icon next to your name, then go to Gravatar.com and sign up - it's easy!