<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is Obama&#8217;s Strategy For Winning?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightvoices.com/2008/02/12/what-is-obamas-strategy-for-winning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightvoices.com/2008/02/12/what-is-obamas-strategy-for-winning/</link>
	<description>in all matter of opinion, our adversaries are insane.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:20:40 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: carolyne</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2008/02/12/what-is-obamas-strategy-for-winning/comment-page-1/#comment-712423</link>
		<dc:creator>carolyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 01:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2008/02/12/what-is-obamas-strategy-for-winning/#comment-712423</guid>
		<description>Same as a snowball in hell.  Haven&#039;t I heard that before, and that race is not an issue.  Humm?????

Are we repeating, as Obama said: if he heard Wright repeat the garbage he said in (church ?)  then that would have been different.  Good line, need to remember that one!  I don&#039;t think I would have wanted to hear those words &amp;XX#Z*%more that once.  By the way, Obama&#039;s toll free number is. . .1-666-SOB-MAMA  - &quot;MA MA told me there would be days like this my MA MA said.&quot; =))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same as a snowball in hell.  Haven&#8217;t I heard that before, and that race is not an issue.  Humm?????</p>
<p>Are we repeating, as Obama said: if he heard Wright repeat the garbage he said in (church ?)  then that would have been different.  Good line, need to remember that one!  I don&#8217;t think I would have wanted to hear those words &amp;XX#Z*%more that once.  By the way, Obama&#8217;s toll free number is. . .1-666-SOB-MAMA  &#8211; &#8220;MA MA told me there would be days like this my MA MA said.&#8221; <img src='http://rightvoices.com/smilies/yahoo_rotfl.gif' alt='&#61;&#41;&#41;' class='wp-smiley' width='30' height='18' title='&#61;&#41;&#41;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BonBon</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2008/02/12/what-is-obamas-strategy-for-winning/comment-page-1/#comment-698198</link>
		<dc:creator>BonBon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2008/02/12/what-is-obamas-strategy-for-winning/#comment-698198</guid>
		<description>Hopefully cooler heads will prevail in this election and realize and understand talk is just talk.  Real action and not just throwing up your fingers with the peace sign is a mark of leadership.  Anyone can talk.

And a big NOT the man does not inspire me.  In fact he reminds me of the Manchurian Candidate.  Not TO BE TRUSTED.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully cooler heads will prevail in this election and realize and understand talk is just talk.  Real action and not just throwing up your fingers with the peace sign is a mark of leadership.  Anyone can talk.</p>
<p>And a big NOT the man does not inspire me.  In fact he reminds me of the Manchurian Candidate.  Not TO BE TRUSTED.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2008/02/12/what-is-obamas-strategy-for-winning/comment-page-1/#comment-698197</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2008/02/12/what-is-obamas-strategy-for-winning/#comment-698197</guid>
		<description>Remember the Governator? He was going to go into sacramento and really shake things he up. No, he wasn&#039;t just going to move the boxes around in the org chart, he was going to &quot;...blow them up.&quot;

The DemokkkRat/Union/Trial Lawyer political machine chewed him up and spit him out. Why? Because there were too many idiot voters in Kalifornia who would not support the Governator. People complain, they say they want change. But when it came to actually doing something about it by supporting him, they went into the ballot boxes and voted to support the status quo. Undercutting him.

So if the Governator couldn&#039;t do it in Sacramento, how does anyone think Obama is going to fare better?

And judging by his extreme leftist background, I don&#039;t think I want any of his kind of change anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember the Governator? He was going to go into sacramento and really shake things he up. No, he wasn&#8217;t just going to move the boxes around in the org chart, he was going to &#8220;&#8230;blow them up.&#8221;</p>
<p>The DemokkkRat/Union/Trial Lawyer political machine chewed him up and spit him out. Why? Because there were too many idiot voters in Kalifornia who would not support the Governator. People complain, they say they want change. But when it came to actually doing something about it by supporting him, they went into the ballot boxes and voted to support the status quo. Undercutting him.</p>
<p>So if the Governator couldn&#8217;t do it in Sacramento, how does anyone think Obama is going to fare better?</p>
<p>And judging by his extreme leftist background, I don&#8217;t think I want any of his kind of change anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2008/02/12/what-is-obamas-strategy-for-winning/comment-page-1/#comment-698196</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2008/02/12/what-is-obamas-strategy-for-winning/#comment-698196</guid>
		<description>Obama is young, energetic, fresh, and not an insider. That is very appealing. The problem is he is 100% populist rhetoric. We&#039;ve herad it ALL beofre.

You see those adoring crowds of young people cheering, as though they&#039;ve just discovered something new. Well to them, maybe they have. But it has all been done before, and the problem is what Obama says just doesn&#039;t add up. It is pure rhetoric.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is young, energetic, fresh, and not an insider. That is very appealing. The problem is he is 100% populist rhetoric. We&#8217;ve herad it ALL beofre.</p>
<p>You see those adoring crowds of young people cheering, as though they&#8217;ve just discovered something new. Well to them, maybe they have. But it has all been done before, and the problem is what Obama says just doesn&#8217;t add up. It is pure rhetoric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2008/02/12/what-is-obamas-strategy-for-winning/comment-page-1/#comment-698180</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2008/02/12/what-is-obamas-strategy-for-winning/#comment-698180</guid>
		<description>SFL, Republicans aren&#039;t interested in moving stagnant issues forward. Trying to lose a war by surrendering is not in our realm of thinking. We are not into socialistic programs such as S-CHIP like the left is.  We have no interest in working with the far left..Obama has no record to except his far left record..We don&#039;t want him, you can keep him!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SFL, Republicans aren&#8217;t interested in moving stagnant issues forward. Trying to lose a war by surrendering is not in our realm of thinking. We are not into socialistic programs such as S-CHIP like the left is.  We have no interest in working with the far left..Obama has no record to except his far left record..We don&#8217;t want him, you can keep him!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2008/02/12/what-is-obamas-strategy-for-winning/comment-page-1/#comment-698148</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2008/02/12/what-is-obamas-strategy-for-winning/#comment-698148</guid>
		<description>I agree with bon Bon! Obama, bring Osama in, in handcuffs. Then we&#039;ll talk about your future...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with bon Bon! Obama, bring Osama in, in handcuffs. Then we&#8217;ll talk about your future&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: San Francisco Liberal</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2008/02/12/what-is-obamas-strategy-for-winning/comment-page-1/#comment-698130</link>
		<dc:creator>San Francisco Liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2008/02/12/what-is-obamas-strategy-for-winning/#comment-698130</guid>
		<description>BonBon, I think that one of Sen. Obama&#039;s main attractions is his extreme willingness to bring different groups together to try and reach a consensus.

He has repeatedly said that he will genuinely try to work with Republicans to move stagnant issues forward.  Healthcare, pollution controls, etc.

I would think that Republicans interested in moving America &quot;forward&quot; would be more inclined to accept an Obama presidency rather than a second Clinton gig.

The man is open to discussion and suggestion, and that&#039;s more than anyone can say about the Clintons or the majority of other politicians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BonBon, I think that one of Sen. Obama&#8217;s main attractions is his extreme willingness to bring different groups together to try and reach a consensus.</p>
<p>He has repeatedly said that he will genuinely try to work with Republicans to move stagnant issues forward.  Healthcare, pollution controls, etc.</p>
<p>I would think that Republicans interested in moving America &#8220;forward&#8221; would be more inclined to accept an Obama presidency rather than a second Clinton gig.</p>
<p>The man is open to discussion and suggestion, and that&#8217;s more than anyone can say about the Clintons or the majority of other politicians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BonBon</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2008/02/12/what-is-obamas-strategy-for-winning/comment-page-1/#comment-697396</link>
		<dc:creator>BonBon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2008/02/12/what-is-obamas-strategy-for-winning/#comment-697396</guid>
		<description>I think if he were to use his muslim muscle and get Osama Bin Laden to surrender he might have some credibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think if he were to use his muslim muscle and get Osama Bin Laden to surrender he might have some credibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BonBon</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2008/02/12/what-is-obamas-strategy-for-winning/comment-page-1/#comment-697395</link>
		<dc:creator>BonBon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2008/02/12/what-is-obamas-strategy-for-winning/#comment-697395</guid>
		<description>Obama&#039;s strategy is change but he hasn&#039;t said anything other than he would bring our troops home and then attack Pakistan.  

And I heard him say he would make tax cuts permanent yet if that&#039;s true why did he vote against them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama&#8217;s strategy is change but he hasn&#8217;t said anything other than he would bring our troops home and then attack Pakistan.  </p>
<p>And I heard him say he would make tax cuts permanent yet if that&#8217;s true why did he vote against them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://rightvoices.com/2008/02/12/what-is-obamas-strategy-for-winning/comment-page-1/#comment-697391</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightvoices.com/2008/02/12/what-is-obamas-strategy-for-winning/#comment-697391</guid>
		<description>All reports are saying Obama is poised to move solidly ahead of Hitlary. When that happens I am waiting to see if the KKKlinton attack smear machine will be unleashed. Their is risk in doing that, but I don&#039;t see how they can resist. There is almost certain defeat if they do nothing; and besides, that&#039;s how the Klintons play. That is what they know, it is what they have always done, it is who they are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All reports are saying Obama is poised to move solidly ahead of Hitlary. When that happens I am waiting to see if the KKKlinton attack smear machine will be unleashed. Their is risk in doing that, but I don&#8217;t see how they can resist. There is almost certain defeat if they do nothing; and besides, that&#8217;s how the Klintons play. That is what they know, it is what they have always done, it is who they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
