OBAMA’S LIMO SEX & DRUG PARTY
By: Pam On: Feb/19/08 - 17 Comments
Fred DawesWell yes Obama would tell his main Bitchs to back off, after all Obama said he is a Muslim over 30 times In...
The Pink FlamingoUPDATED: It has recently come to my attention that there are indeed two John Brimelows in this...
RobertWhat is needed is not to threaten or overthrow the US Govt, but to restore it. Restore it to to the health,...
libbie basherRobert Hassan has no worries, the legal arm of the Democratic party (The ACLU) will lawyer him up so...
libbie basherIt is sad the state of affairs in this country. 40+ years of liberalism has ruined this once great...
Coltonthis post has inspired me, i need to get back to posting on my blog soon, its so easy to loose track of time...
Fred DawesI do cry when i think of our future and bon bon you are right. the next blood bath will be 100 million dead.
Scotty HancockI just wanted to thank you very much for this illuminating article. I have already bookmarked your...
RobertBy now Hassan should be an icon and martyr of the American Left. Because he’s a victim! He always tried...
The Pink Flamingo“If my people who are called by my name humble themselves, pray, seek my face, and turn from...
Teh Resistance BlogItem Number Three: Democrats are pitching a fit over plans to burn Nancy Pelosi in effigy at an...
BonBonCan anyone even begin to imagine what the left would be shouting if Bush had told Congress to back off of an...
BonBonHistorically speaking REAL americans are not above a revolution. I can definitely see one coming. Sometimes I...
RobertThe Nobama Administration is reportedly working behind the scenes to sign international treaties that would ban...
snowy egretIts too bad none of those victims had a gun and sent that shooter to the morgue with a bullet holes in his...
RobertI’m not even thinking about the concept of a second term for this disaster. I’m still worried about...
BonBonOne term president. God help us if he gets elected again. My fears are that the next time we’ll get a...
RobertYes, you’re right, it has and will. Predictably, of course as you point out. Just as we all predicted...
BonBonBut you know Robert, not admitting their mistakes is going to cost a whole lot more american lives. I’m...
RobertIn their rush to undermine and discredit Bush the Left has painted itslef into a corner. Now even the ones that...
February 19, 2008 - 12:38 PM on February 19th, 2008
Interesting clip. I have some problems with it though such as he didn’t show any evidence. I’d love to hear and see what he has to prove it. Otherwise, he has no credibility.
I know others might think the Clinton machine is behind this and that may well be true but for now I need more proof.
And also, I can’t say this doesn’t please me because this muslim needs to be stopped. hehehe
February 19, 2008 - 01:01 PM on February 19th, 2008
Heh heh heh! The KKKlinton smear machine has swung into action; the attack dogs have been unleashed. Young Obama is now going to learn firsthand about the politics of personal destruction. He is going to understand what it’s like to get in the mud and slug it out with political vermin who are quite comfortable operating in that venue.
February 19, 2008 - 01:41 PM on February 19th, 2008
[...] Right Voices wrote an interesting post today on OBAMA’S LIMO SEX & DRUG PARTYHere’s a quick excerpt Tags: Barack, Obama,, Gay, Sex,, Larry, Sinclair [...]
February 19, 2008 - 02:12 PM on February 19th, 2008
Weak. Not even worth watching.
Clinton had better watch out…the “politics of personal destruction” will backfire on her if she goes overboard trying to take on Obama.
Obama supporters, independants and moderates are NOT as easily influenced by these kinds of garbage-attacks as others might be.
February 19, 2008 - 02:16 PM on February 19th, 2008
1- But Bon Bon, I thought that the only proof needed was the word of a homosexual..afterall, that’s how the left does it
February 19, 2008 - 02:20 PM on February 19th, 2008
3- Your plagiarist hasn’t even found the connection between Larry and the Hillary camp!
Oh but look, he has accepted a challenge . Larry Sinclair Accepts WhiteHouse.com $100,000 Polygraph Challenge
February 19, 2008 - 02:45 PM on February 19th, 2008
5. How could I forget? I’m just crossing my fingers that it really is true and the Clintons are behind it. I will be laughing my a__ off
February 19, 2008 - 03:06 PM on February 19th, 2008
“Obama supporters, independants and moderates are NOT as easily influenced by these kinds of garbage-attacks as others might be.”
Oh puh-leeze.
If they are simple minded enough to believe the “change” campaign that Obama is peddling, then they are stupid enough to believe anything.
“It feels good” is absolutely no reason to vote for anything or anyone.
February 19, 2008 - 03:27 PM on February 19th, 2008
What’s the big deal anyway about an Obama sex and drug party, anyway? For BillyJeff, that was just an average day at the office!!!
Ba da da dum, pssh! (drum flourish)
February 19, 2008 - 03:34 PM on February 19th, 2008
Robert,
Ihe did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky.Ihe never told anybody to lie, not a single time – never. These allegations are falseFebruary 19, 2008 - 03:39 PM on February 19th, 2008
Jay Leno, you have my permission to use the above material…
February 19, 2008 - 03:42 PM on February 19th, 2008
Pam, has there ever been a documented case of a Klinton telling the truth? In any situation, ever? I mean the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. Not parsed truth, not half truth, not just a grain of truth. Pure, simple, 100% Truth. Ever? I can’t think of any right off.
That would be an interesting project…
February 19, 2008 - 03:46 PM on February 19th, 2008
In recognition of the Democritic campaign now officially turning dirty, I have a word of advice for young Obama: Watch your back, and stay far, far away from public parks at night…
February 19, 2008 - 04:23 PM on February 19th, 2008
12- Robert, everything they say is the truth, you just don’t recognize it because it is their truth
February 19, 2008 - 06:20 PM on February 19th, 2008
I think i understand now…it is actually a question of definition. Like what is “is”? My definition of truth does not coincide with theirs.
I foolishly forgot that they are part of the Relativist movement, where there is no such thing as right or wrong, good or bad, truth or falsehood. Everything is situational and 100% subjective.
That explains it.
February 19, 2008 - 07:10 PM on February 19th, 2008
Correct again my friend!
February 19, 2008 - 11:48 PM on February 19th, 2008
I once had an ROTC instructor ask if anyone believed in situational ethics, and then began railing about there was no such thing. I kept my mouth shut but was so tempted to ask “But Sir, if a person did believe in situational ethics, wouldn’t they know that this would be a good time to NOT admit it?” Personally, I always believed that being a warrior required a certain degree of situational ethics. Ethically, it’s wrong to kill. In war, it’s not only a possibility, it’s a necessity. The situation dictates that actions that would be otherwise unethical are necessary. I have to have a lot of respect for the conscientious objectors who serve in combat zones anyway. It takes a lot more guts than I have to go into one of those places unarmed. With my neighborhood, I don’t like going into my backyard unarmed.
Likewise when at OBC they presented us with the scenario of being low on fuel, facing being overrun and the locals refusing to accept the US military credit card for gas, I told them that I had a 5.56 credit card that insured I got all of the fuel that I needed to get out of town. When they told me that that was against the Geneva convention and I’d be court martialled, I just looked at them and said ” Hmmm, let me see… Three hots and a cot in Leavenworth and my men in friendly territory, or all of us in a Soviet POW camp? I think I’ll take option A.” The Captains didn’t like my answer, but couldn’t fault my logic.