Interesting clip. I have some problems with it though such as he didn’t show any evidence. I’d love to hear and see what he has to prove it. Otherwise, he has no credibility.
I know others might think the Clinton machine is behind this and that may well be true but for now I need more proof.
And also, I can’t say this doesn’t please me because this muslim needs to be stopped. hehehe
Heh heh heh! The KKKlinton smear machine has swung into action; the attack dogs have been unleashed. Young Obama is now going to learn firsthand about the politics of personal destruction. He is going to understand what it’s like to get in the mud and slug it out with political vermin who are quite comfortable operating in that venue.
Robert, I he did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky. I he never told anybody to lie, not a single time – never. These allegations are false [-x :^o
Pam, has there ever been a documented case of a Klinton telling the truth? In any situation, ever? I mean the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. Not parsed truth, not half truth, not just a grain of truth. Pure, simple, 100% Truth. Ever? I can’t think of any right off.
In recognition of the Democritic campaign now officially turning dirty, I have a word of advice for young Obama: Watch your back, and stay far, far away from public parks at night…
I think i understand now…it is actually a question of definition. Like what is “is”? My definition of truth does not coincide with theirs.
I foolishly forgot that they are part of the Relativist movement, where there is no such thing as right or wrong, good or bad, truth or falsehood. Everything is situational and 100% subjective.
I once had an ROTC instructor ask if anyone believed in situational ethics, and then began railing about there was no such thing. I kept my mouth shut but was so tempted to ask “But Sir, if a person did believe in situational ethics, wouldn’t they know that this would be a good time to NOT admit it?” Personally, I always believed that being a warrior required a certain degree of situational ethics. Ethically, it’s wrong to kill. In war, it’s not only a possibility, it’s a necessity. The situation dictates that actions that would be otherwise unethical are necessary. I have to have a lot of respect for the conscientious objectors who serve in combat zones anyway. It takes a lot more guts than I have to go into one of those places unarmed. With my neighborhood, I don’t like going into my backyard unarmed.
Likewise when at OBC they presented us with the scenario of being low on fuel, facing being overrun and the locals refusing to accept the US military credit card for gas, I told them that I had a 5.56 credit card that insured I got all of the fuel that I needed to get out of town. When they told me that that was against the Geneva convention and I’d be court martialled, I just looked at them and said ” Hmmm, let me see… Three hots and a cot in Leavenworth and my men in friendly territory, or all of us in a Soviet POW camp? I think I’ll take option A.” The Captains didn’t like my answer, but couldn’t fault my logic.
Interesting clip. I have some problems with it though such as he didn’t show any evidence. I’d love to hear and see what he has to prove it. Otherwise, he has no credibility.
I know others might think the Clinton machine is behind this and that may well be true but for now I need more proof.
And also, I can’t say this doesn’t please me because this muslim needs to be stopped. hehehe
Heh heh heh! The KKKlinton smear machine has swung into action; the attack dogs have been unleashed. Young Obama is now going to learn firsthand about the politics of personal destruction. He is going to understand what it’s like to get in the mud and slug it out with political vermin who are quite comfortable operating in that venue.
Weak. Not even worth watching.
Clinton had better watch out…the “politics of personal destruction” will backfire on her if she goes overboard trying to take on Obama.
Obama supporters, independants and moderates are NOT as easily influenced by these kinds of garbage-attacks as others might be.
1- But Bon Bon, I thought that the only proof needed was the word of a homosexual..afterall, that’s how the left does it
3- Your plagiarist hasn’t even found the connection between Larry and the Hillary camp! =))
Oh but look, he has accepted a challenge . Larry Sinclair Accepts WhiteHouse.com $100,000 Polygraph Challenge
5. How could I forget? I’m just crossing my fingers that it really is true and the Clintons are behind it. I will be laughing my a__ off =))
“Obama supporters, independants and moderates are NOT as easily influenced by these kinds of garbage-attacks as others might be.”
Oh puh-leeze.
If they are simple minded enough to believe the “change” campaign that Obama is peddling, then they are stupid enough to believe anything.
“It feels good” is absolutely no reason to vote for anything or anyone.
What’s the big deal anyway about an Obama sex and drug party, anyway? For BillyJeff, that was just an average day at the office!!!
Ba da da dum, pssh! (drum flourish)
Robert,
Ihe did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky.Ihe never told anybody to lie, not a single time – never. These allegations are false [-x :^oJay Leno, you have my permission to use the above material…
Pam, has there ever been a documented case of a Klinton telling the truth? In any situation, ever? I mean the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. Not parsed truth, not half truth, not just a grain of truth. Pure, simple, 100% Truth. Ever? I can’t think of any right off.
That would be an interesting project…
In recognition of the Democritic campaign now officially turning dirty, I have a word of advice for young Obama: Watch your back, and stay far, far away from public parks at night…
12- Robert, everything they say is the truth, you just don’t recognize it because it is their truth
)
I think i understand now…it is actually a question of definition. Like what is “is”? My definition of truth does not coincide with theirs.
I foolishly forgot that they are part of the Relativist movement, where there is no such thing as right or wrong, good or bad, truth or falsehood. Everything is situational and 100% subjective.
That explains it.
Correct again my friend!
I once had an ROTC instructor ask if anyone believed in situational ethics, and then began railing about there was no such thing. I kept my mouth shut but was so tempted to ask “But Sir, if a person did believe in situational ethics, wouldn’t they know that this would be a good time to NOT admit it?” Personally, I always believed that being a warrior required a certain degree of situational ethics. Ethically, it’s wrong to kill. In war, it’s not only a possibility, it’s a necessity. The situation dictates that actions that would be otherwise unethical are necessary. I have to have a lot of respect for the conscientious objectors who serve in combat zones anyway. It takes a lot more guts than I have to go into one of those places unarmed. With my neighborhood, I don’t like going into my backyard unarmed.
Likewise when at OBC they presented us with the scenario of being low on fuel, facing being overrun and the locals refusing to accept the US military credit card for gas, I told them that I had a 5.56 credit card that insured I got all of the fuel that I needed to get out of town. When they told me that that was against the Geneva convention and I’d be court martialled, I just looked at them and said ” Hmmm, let me see… Three hots and a cot in Leavenworth and my men in friendly territory, or all of us in a Soviet POW camp? I think I’ll take option A.” The Captains didn’t like my answer, but couldn’t fault my logic.