Obama made the following statement in last nights debate:
OBAMA: You know, I’ve heard from an Army captain who was the head of a rifle platoon ” supposed to have 39 men in a rifle platoon. Ended up being sent to Afghanistan with 24 because 15 of those soldiers had been sent to Iraq.
And as a consequence, they didn’t have enough ammunition, they didn’t have enough Humvees. They were actually capturing Taliban weapons, because it was easier to get Taliban weapons than it was for them to get properly equipped by our current commander in chief.
Immediately, people started asking questions, and the story has opened a can of Obama is ignorant worms. Stephen Spruiell spoke with Obama advisor David Axelrod to get clarification on the statement:
AXELROD: That was a discussion that a captain in the military had with our staff, and he asked that that be passed along to Senator Obama.
Chris G made this comment at Flopping Aces:
What a crock of outright lies and BS!!!! Platoons are not split up along theater level lines. A Platoon is the smallest tactical element commonly employed. Normal Squads, which make up Platoons, do not go out alone unless covered by something big (Tank/Infantry squad teams for example).
Units are not halved for combat!! Units in Afghanistan were not used in Iraq and the two events occurred almost a year apart!! 10th Mountain went into Afghanistan fully manned. 10th Mountain was not used in Iraq. Also, all units have organic vehicles. Divisions are not stripped of vehicles for another theater operation. We have APS fleets to cover this (pre-deployed assets in Kuwait)!!! Obama should know about this as funding for the APS fleets are in the appropriations bills.
So on this aspect: FLAT OUT LIE by Obama!!!!!!
Now, as for Obama’s military skills, exactly WHAT captain leads a platoon?????? 2LTs lead platoons with a few 1LTs who might lead one as the senior platoon leader in a company, COMMANDED by a captain. Maybe this was a captain who lead a platoon You know, I’ve heard from an Army captain who was the head of a
rifle platoon ” supposed to have 39 men in a rifle platoon. Ended up
being sent to Afghanistan with 24 because 15 of those soldiers had been
sent to Iraq.And as a consequence, they didn’t have enough ammunition,
they didn’t have enough Humvees. They were actually capturing Taliban
weapons, because it was easier to get Taliban weapons than it was for
them to get properly equipped by our current commander in chief. years ago, however, Obama’s lack of knowledge betrays him. Even if Obama is not slandering/making up a story by the officer, it will be the first anyone I know of has heard about this lack of equipment and ammo issue.Now as for weapons. No kidding we use the enemy’s when we can. The same is true for the initial invasion of Iraq. Ammunition is always a sought commodity, but there was no shortage of transports getting it to Afghanistan. HOWEVER, in the midst of a fire fight, ammo runs low and many Soldiers/Marines know how to use the AK series (AKM/AK-74 and SVD). Since a majority of US Military Members are gun owners/shooters and many are NRA members, we tend to learn all we can about weapons and teach those who are not hunters/shooters in our ranks. A light infantry unit can only carry so much ammo on extended missions. Air resupply is not always available while in combat (helicopters draw enemy fire for some reason) and ground resupply is not always able to get up the goat trails that comprise Afghanistan.
However, I know a captain who commanded in 10th Mountain in Afghanistan during the most intense fighting there and he NEVER had problems with lack of men, equipment, or ammo. But then, I am an Army officer who, like a VAST, near total majority of us, supports the war so my opinion is unwanted by the left.
The more Obama speaks, the more he digs holes.
Jack Tapper at ABC tried to shed light on the story, but as failed, as the AP points out:
He underscored his point in the Democratic debate Thursday by telling a story about a rifle platoon in Afghanistan that allegedly didn’t have enough soldiers or weapons to do its job, leaving the platoon to scrounge for weapons from the Taliban:
The captain said [to ABC], however, that the unit did not go after the Taliban for the purpose of getting their weapons, but sometimes used those weapons when some were captured.
Obama said the platoon was supposed to have 39 soldiers. A platoon does not have to consist of 39, but can have between 16 to 40 soldiers, according to standard Army unit organization. It is also commanded by a lieutenant and not a captain.
According to Michael Goldfarb, Senator John Warner sent a letter to Barack Obama. Please take the time to read the letter, but here is a synopsis from Michael:
Warner refers to Obama’s comments as “a disturbing framework of factual allegations.”
According to Jake Tapper’s report earlier today, the unnamed captain to whom Obama attributed the account was deployed to Afghanistan in the summer of 2003. Warner was, at the time, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee. As such, he explains that he has “a responsibility to establish where in the military chain of command rests the ‘accountability’ [for the shortfalls], depending of course, on the accuracy of the facts.”
Warner informs Obama that he is working with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs to determine the facts of the incident described in last nights debate, and that he intends to raise the issues next Tuesday when Secretary of the Army Pete Green and General Casey appear before the committee.
Further, he asks Obama to provide the “essential facts of when- the dates- the unit was deployed, to which brigade combat team, or other unit it was assigned, the name and current location of the captain, or other military personnel who shared the alleged facts with you, so that the committee staff can debrief them.”
This comes just hours after Reuters reported doubts within the Pentagon as to the veracity of Obama’s account.
Trackposted to Outside the Beltway, The Virtuous Republic, Rosemary’s Thoughts, 123beta, Right Truth, Shadowscope, Leaning Straight Up, Big Dog’s Weblog, Cao’s Blog, Conservative Cat, Adeline and Hazel, Diary of the Mad Pigeon, Nuke Gingrich, Woman Honor Thyself, Pirate’s Cove, Celebrity Smack, The Pink Flamingo, Wolf Pangloss, Dumb Ox Daily News, , Gone Hollywood, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.


Did you read what the article said? Do you know who Casey is?
Pretty much backs up what Obama was told and what he then said at the debate…
Another “scandal” bites the dust…
No, what it said was Obama should have done his homework. It says that the unit was staffed, and there may have been spot shortages, but these guys were not out scrounging enemy ammo and guns.
It negates what Obama said! Had Obmama talked to the proper people that he has access to, he could have found this out.
43, FAO, SFL’s demonstrated inability to read with understanding is posted by himself in 50 and 52. He is an idiot.
Regardless of the technical details behind the story, the fact that Obama regurgitated it, complete with fundamental errors and logic holes you could drive a truck through, demonstrates he is utterly ignorant about the composition, doctrine, role, and command of the US Military.
Translation: He’s not ready for primetime, especially in wartime.
And HilLiary loathes the Military. So there’s nothing on the Democrite side that can do that job.
In fact, I will now make the point that unless someone has served in the US Military, they are not qualified to be CIC.
I agree Robert. With things the way they are in the world, countries first hating us then begging us for our help when things get tough for them I think it would be in our best interest to elect a military man for President. Anyone less and they’ll go the diplomacy route right down the path of destruction for us.
Conversation with a liberal just the other day regarding the non vote of surveillance laws by the House.
“So you feel safer now that we can’t surveil terrorists?”
“Yes, I do.”
“Great, then you’re okay with hundreds, maybe thousands of Americans killed in another terrorist attack?”
Silence. Complete blank stare.
Yup, those non military types sure do like to TALK. :-w