Comments on: Spitzer: The Expected Reaction From The Left http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/10/spitzer-the-expected-reaction-from-the-left/ in all matter of opinion, our adversaries are insane. Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:05:09 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Pam http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/10/spitzer-the-expected-reaction-from-the-left/comment-page-1/#comment-710077 Pam Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:14:51 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/10/spitzer-the-expected-reaction-from-the-left/#comment-710077 =)) =))

]]> By: Robert http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/10/spitzer-the-expected-reaction-from-the-left/comment-page-1/#comment-710068 Robert Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:55:21 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/10/spitzer-the-expected-reaction-from-the-left/#comment-710068 I saw Spitzer on TV last night and he is an ugly SOB! :-j No wonder he had to pay $5k/pop for those hookers! They probably charge most clients $500. :)) I saw Spitzer on TV last night and he is an ugly SOB! :-j No wonder he had to pay $5k/pop for those hookers! They probably charge most clients $500. :))

]]> By: TedintheShed http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/10/spitzer-the-expected-reaction-from-the-left/comment-page-1/#comment-709817 TedintheShed Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:05:09 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/10/spitzer-the-expected-reaction-from-the-left/#comment-709817 Isn't Larry Craig still in office? J/W... Isn’t Larry Craig still in office?

J/W…

]]> By: FrmrArtyOffcr http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/10/spitzer-the-expected-reaction-from-the-left/comment-page-1/#comment-709709 FrmrArtyOffcr Wed, 12 Mar 2008 05:21:13 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/10/spitzer-the-expected-reaction-from-the-left/#comment-709709 I kind of doubt that someone runs a set up for over 6 years and charges the mark in excess of $80,000 for services rendered during that time. I kind of doubt that someone runs a set up for over 6 years and charges the mark in excess of $80,000 for services rendered during that time.

]]> By: Pam http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/10/spitzer-the-expected-reaction-from-the-left/comment-page-1/#comment-709592 Pam Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:13:19 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/10/spitzer-the-expected-reaction-from-the-left/#comment-709592 I'm pretty sure that had this been a set-up, they'd have outted him before he was elected. I’m pretty sure that had this been a set-up, they’d have outted him before he was elected.

]]> By: Ivor banks http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/10/spitzer-the-expected-reaction-from-the-left/comment-page-1/#comment-709585 Ivor banks Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:54:34 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/10/spitzer-the-expected-reaction-from-the-left/#comment-709585 What is the tie between the mysterious high priced call girl " Kristen" who serviced the Governor and Roger and Nydia Stone the acknowldeged " swingers" who were outed by the National Enquirer a few years ago? The Stone's frequented a Swingers sex club called le Trapeze in NYC and were " regulars" in a 3-some with a beutiful girl named "Kristen" who worked as a prostitute. I heard the Stones were trying to 'flip" the girl to the Feds because she had a hush-hush high profile client who I know believe is Eliot Spitzer. Thais was a SET-UP ! What is the tie between the mysterious high priced call girl ” Kristen” who serviced the Governor and Roger and Nydia Stone the acknowldeged ” swingers” who were outed by the National Enquirer a few years ago?

The Stone’s frequented a Swingers sex club called le Trapeze in NYC and were ” regulars” in a 3-some with a beutiful girl named “Kristen” who worked as a prostitute.

I heard the Stones were trying to ‘flip” the girl to the Feds because she had a hush-hush high profile client who I know believe is Eliot Spitzer.

Thais was a SET-UP !

]]> By: Robert http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/10/spitzer-the-expected-reaction-from-the-left/comment-page-1/#comment-709502 Robert Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:46:34 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/10/spitzer-the-expected-reaction-from-the-left/#comment-709502 Oh, yes! Circle the wagons, rationalize it all away! He's a Democrite, so it is just a personal matter. Frankly, I wouldn't give a damn if Spitzer hadn't been such a zealous prosecutor/persecutor of others. Oh, yes! Circle the wagons, rationalize it all away! He’s a Democrite, so it is just a personal matter.

Frankly, I wouldn’t give a damn if Spitzer hadn’t been such a zealous prosecutor/persecutor of others.

]]> By: TedintheShed http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/10/spitzer-the-expected-reaction-from-the-left/comment-page-1/#comment-709395 TedintheShed Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:30:03 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/10/spitzer-the-expected-reaction-from-the-left/#comment-709395 Look! Another criminal and crooked politician fgrom one of the two major parties. The line drawing the differences between your parties are absolutely blurred. Look! Another criminal and crooked politician fgrom one of the two major parties.

The line drawing the differences between your parties are absolutely blurred.

]]> By: FrmrArtyOffcr http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/10/spitzer-the-expected-reaction-from-the-left/comment-page-1/#comment-709230 FrmrArtyOffcr Tue, 11 Mar 2008 06:18:33 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/10/spitzer-the-expected-reaction-from-the-left/#comment-709230 Spitzer a capitalist? What moron wrote that line? Spitzer has been pushing for one tax hike after another. That's absolutely antithetical to being a capitalist. Anyone with two functioning brain cells knows that tax rate increases do NOT promote capitalism, but rather stifle it. WHY? Because Taxes are an expense that does nothing to contribute to the bottom line. They don't buy inventory, they don't pay labor expenses, they don't produce sales. They simply take money out of the company coffers that would otherwise be used to grow the company. That's why tax rate reductions always lead to tax revenue increases. The ebst analogy I've been able to come up with is to look at money as seeds. The more seeds that the farmer has to plant in his fields, the more crop that he can grow. The higher the percentage of seed that the government takes, the lower the amount of remaining seed that the farmer has available to plant. If one planted seed produces 200 more seeds when the crop comes in, it makes much more sense to take a smaller percentage of seeds and get more seeds in the long run. A farmer who pays 20% of his 300 seeds in taxes only has 240 seeds to plant and only produces 48000 new seeds. After paying 20 % again, the farmer has paid 9660 seeds and only has 38400 seeds to plant. However had the farmer paid 10% of his harvest in taxes the first year, he'd have had 270 seeds to plant with a yield of 54000 seeds. Paying 10% would've yielded 5300 seeds to the government and 49000 to plant. After 8 years, the amount of seed paid in tax at the lower rate is double that at the higher rate. Which is better, to raise rates, stifle growth and reduce revenues? Or to lower rates, increase growth and increase revenues? Spitzer a capitalist? What moron wrote that line? Spitzer has been pushing for one tax hike after another. That’s absolutely antithetical to being a capitalist. Anyone with two functioning brain cells knows that tax rate increases do NOT promote capitalism, but rather stifle it. WHY? Because Taxes are an expense that does nothing to contribute to the bottom line. They don’t buy inventory, they don’t pay labor expenses, they don’t produce sales. They simply take money out of the company coffers that would otherwise be used to grow the company. That’s why tax rate reductions always lead to tax revenue increases. The ebst analogy I’ve been able to come up with is to look at money as seeds. The more seeds that the farmer has to plant in his fields, the more crop that he can grow. The higher the percentage of seed that the government takes, the lower the amount of remaining seed that the farmer has available to plant. If one planted seed produces 200 more seeds when the crop comes in, it makes much more sense to take a smaller percentage of seeds and get more seeds in the long run. A farmer who pays 20% of his 300 seeds in taxes only has 240 seeds to plant and only produces 48000 new seeds. After paying 20 % again, the farmer has paid 9660 seeds and only has 38400 seeds to plant.
However had the farmer paid 10% of his harvest in taxes the first year, he’d have had 270 seeds to plant with a yield of 54000 seeds. Paying 10% would’ve yielded 5300 seeds to the government and 49000 to plant. After 8 years, the amount of seed paid in tax at the lower rate is double that at the higher rate. Which is better, to raise rates, stifle growth and reduce revenues? Or to lower rates, increase growth and increase revenues?

]]>