Comments on: WaPo on SCOTUS: Abortion Ban Is ‘Paternalistic’ Vs Hand Gun Ban “Every right, no matter how precious, is subject to some limits” http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/17/wapo-on-scotus-abortion-ban-is-paternalistic-vs-hand-gun-ban-every-right-no-matter-how-precious-is-subject-to-some-limits/ in all matter of opinion, our adversaries are insane. Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:20:40 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Rebekah Worsham http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/17/wapo-on-scotus-abortion-ban-is-paternalistic-vs-hand-gun-ban-every-right-no-matter-how-precious-is-subject-to-some-limits/comment-page-1/#comment-736400 Rebekah Worsham Fri, 06 Mar 2009 02:59:52 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/17/wapo-on-scotus-abortion-ban-is-paternalistic-vs-hand-gun-ban-every-right-no-matter-how-precious-is-subject-to-some-limits/#comment-736400 Abortion should be allowed legally without being looked down upon. For cases of rape and incest, adoption could be an answer. However, with rape, who on earth would want to wake up with something growing in them as a daily reminder to the trauma that the mother was forced to endure. With incest, the chances of the child being deformed are greatly increased, whether physically or emotionally deformed. With either of those circumstances and adoption being an option, you run the risk of that child never being adopted, never having a true home, and never feeling wanted or loved. For those reasons, I think abortion should be allowed. Only up to a certain point- nine weeks should be the cut off. Nine weeks is when the mass of cells actually forms a fetus; partial birth abortions should not be allowed. Abortion should be allowed legally without being looked down upon. For cases of rape and incest, adoption could be an answer. However, with rape, who on earth would want to wake up with something growing in them as a daily reminder to the trauma that the mother was forced to endure. With incest, the chances of the child being deformed are greatly increased, whether physically or emotionally deformed. With either of those circumstances and adoption being an option, you run the risk of that child never being adopted, never having a true home, and never feeling wanted or loved. For those reasons, I think abortion should be allowed. Only up to a certain point- nine weeks should be the cut off. Nine weeks is when the mass of cells actually forms a fetus; partial birth abortions should not be allowed.

]]> By: Bosco http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/17/wapo-on-scotus-abortion-ban-is-paternalistic-vs-hand-gun-ban-every-right-no-matter-how-precious-is-subject-to-some-limits/comment-page-1/#comment-733540 Bosco Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:38:49 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/17/wapo-on-scotus-abortion-ban-is-paternalistic-vs-hand-gun-ban-every-right-no-matter-how-precious-is-subject-to-some-limits/#comment-733540 SHMAJAY- The pictures showing the procedure are factual, not old or outdated, however there is yet another method for partial birth abortion called Dilation and extraction in which the fetus is basically quartered.. Cut into about six pieces, legs and arms, torso, than the head is the last to be removed. Is that recent enough for you? You should go to the National Right to Life's website.  ANYONE who performs any of these so-called procedures or has had one is pure evil as far as I'm concerned and I would hold them on a scale of evil equivalent to that of Jeffery Dahmer. Worse even because these victims are completely defenseless. SHMAJAY- The pictures showing the procedure are factual, not old or outdated, however there is yet another method for partial birth abortion called Dilation and extraction in which the fetus is basically quartered.. Cut into about six pieces, legs and arms, torso, than the head is the last to be removed. Is that recent enough for you? You should go to the National Right to Life’s website.  ANYONE who performs any of these so-called procedures or has had one is pure evil as far as I’m concerned and I would hold them on a scale of evil equivalent to that of Jeffery Dahmer. Worse even because these victims are completely defenseless.

]]> By: Robert http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/17/wapo-on-scotus-abortion-ban-is-paternalistic-vs-hand-gun-ban-every-right-no-matter-how-precious-is-subject-to-some-limits/comment-page-1/#comment-732433 Robert Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:46:22 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/17/wapo-on-scotus-abortion-ban-is-paternalistic-vs-hand-gun-ban-every-right-no-matter-how-precious-is-subject-to-some-limits/#comment-732433 uh, well, yes, um, you know, uh Obama does not believe in the second amendment and we've already seen what the Left thinks of the First Amendment. And of course unborn babies have no rights. But no doubt some rights are sacred to them: The right to be a degenerate, and to attack others who choose not to live that way for whatever reason is the first one that comes to mind. uh, well, yes, um, you know, uh Obama does not believe in the second amendment and we’ve already seen what the Left thinks of the First Amendment. And of course unborn babies have no rights.

But no doubt some rights are sacred to them: The right to be a degenerate, and to attack others who choose not to live that way for whatever reason is the first one that comes to mind.

]]> By: Shmajay http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/17/wapo-on-scotus-abortion-ban-is-paternalistic-vs-hand-gun-ban-every-right-no-matter-how-precious-is-subject-to-some-limits/comment-page-1/#comment-731445 Shmajay Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:25:26 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/17/wapo-on-scotus-abortion-ban-is-paternalistic-vs-hand-gun-ban-every-right-no-matter-how-precious-is-subject-to-some-limits/#comment-731445 The images above are in fact old and outdated, the partial birth system is no longer in use. I do stand by the Pro-life and will stand up for it, but its the extremely biased pics that this one that give the pro-life a bad name. The right to pro-choice is a farce because the women who do get these abortions took the risk of having unprotected sex, and not taking responsibility for their actions. Unless the mothers life is at risk or its rape it should be illegal The images above are in fact old and outdated, the partial birth system is no longer in use. I do stand by the Pro-life and will stand up for it, but its the extremely biased pics that this one that give the pro-life a bad name. The right to pro-choice is a farce because the women who do get these abortions took the risk of having unprotected sex, and not taking responsibility for their actions. Unless the mothers life is at risk or its rape it should be illegal

]]> By: kaela hood http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/17/wapo-on-scotus-abortion-ban-is-paternalistic-vs-hand-gun-ban-every-right-no-matter-how-precious-is-subject-to-some-limits/comment-page-1/#comment-729661 kaela hood Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:22:48 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/17/wapo-on-scotus-abortion-ban-is-paternalistic-vs-hand-gun-ban-every-right-no-matter-how-precious-is-subject-to-some-limits/#comment-729661 those picture are fuckin sad those picture are fuckin sad

]]> By: snowy egret http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/17/wapo-on-scotus-abortion-ban-is-paternalistic-vs-hand-gun-ban-every-right-no-matter-how-precious-is-subject-to-some-limits/comment-page-1/#comment-712360 snowy egret Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:06:14 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/17/wapo-on-scotus-abortion-ban-is-paternalistic-vs-hand-gun-ban-every-right-no-matter-how-precious-is-subject-to-some-limits/#comment-712360 As usial the WASHINGTON COMPOST favors gun bans and the right to kill the unborn while always supporting some crazy SAVE THE REDWOOD POPPYCOCK;)) As usial the WASHINGTON COMPOST favors gun bans and the right to kill the unborn while always supporting some crazy SAVE THE REDWOOD POPPYCOCK;))

]]> By: Right Voices » Blog Archive » Media shield law remains in doubt http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/17/wapo-on-scotus-abortion-ban-is-paternalistic-vs-hand-gun-ban-every-right-no-matter-how-precious-is-subject-to-some-limits/comment-page-1/#comment-712263 Right Voices » Blog Archive » Media shield law remains in doubt Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:33:51 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/17/wapo-on-scotus-abortion-ban-is-paternalistic-vs-hand-gun-ban-every-right-no-matter-how-precious-is-subject-to-some-limits/#comment-712263 [...] WaPo on SCOTUS: Abortion Ban Is ‘Paternalistic’ Vs Hand Gun Ban “Every right, no m... [...] [...] WaPo on SCOTUS: Abortion Ban Is ‘Paternalistic’ Vs Hand Gun Ban “Every right, no m… [...]

]]> By: FrmrArtyOffcr http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/17/wapo-on-scotus-abortion-ban-is-paternalistic-vs-hand-gun-ban-every-right-no-matter-how-precious-is-subject-to-some-limits/comment-page-1/#comment-712117 FrmrArtyOffcr Tue, 18 Mar 2008 02:23:06 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/17/wapo-on-scotus-abortion-ban-is-paternalistic-vs-hand-gun-ban-every-right-no-matter-how-precious-is-subject-to-some-limits/#comment-712117 Since when is DC NOT the nation's most dangerous city? It has only gotten SUBSTANTIALLY worse since the passage of the gun bill, not better. Criminals and Democrats love unarmed victims. Since when is DC NOT the nation’s most dangerous city? It has only gotten SUBSTANTIALLY worse since the passage of the gun bill, not better. Criminals and Democrats love unarmed victims.

]]> By: WaPo on SCOTUS: Abortion Ban Is ‘Paternalistic' Vs Hand Gun Ban “Every right, no matter how precious, is subject to some limits” http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/17/wapo-on-scotus-abortion-ban-is-paternalistic-vs-hand-gun-ban-every-right-no-matter-how-precious-is-subject-to-some-limits/comment-page-1/#comment-712077 WaPo on SCOTUS: Abortion Ban Is ‘Paternalistic' Vs Hand Gun Ban “Every right, no matter how precious, is subject to some limits” Tue, 18 Mar 2008 00:08:24 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/03/17/wapo-on-scotus-abortion-ban-is-paternalistic-vs-hand-gun-ban-every-right-no-matter-how-precious-is-subject-to-some-limits/#comment-712077 [...] Freedom wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt Got that? The WaPo seems to think that The Second Amendment, while ensconced in the Bill of Rights among provisions protecting freedom of speech and freedom from unreasonable searches, is different. Words can be offensive; bullets can be lethal. Every right, no matter how precious, is subject to some limits. If the justices recognize an individual right, they can and should allow lawmakers maximum flexibility to enact reasonable regulation. In our view, that flexibility should include the Dis [...] [...] Freedom wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt Got that? The WaPo seems to think that The Second Amendment, while ensconced in the Bill of Rights among provisions protecting freedom of speech and freedom from unreasonable searches, is different. Words can be offensive; bullets can be lethal. Every right, no matter how precious, is subject to some limits. If the justices recognize an individual right, they can and should allow lawmakers maximum flexibility to enact reasonable regulation. In our view, that flexibility should include the Dis [...]

]]>