Comments on: Democrats Not Serious About GWOT Yet Somehow Feel That “Iraq is preventing the U.S. from effectively preparing for other conflicts” http://rightvoices.com/2008/04/09/democrats-not-serious-about-gwot-yet-somehow-feel-that-iraq-is-preventing-the-us-from-effectively-preparing-for-other-conflicts/ in all matter of opinion, our adversaries are insane. Sun, 08 Aug 2010 14:43:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: Pam http://rightvoices.com/2008/04/09/democrats-not-serious-about-gwot-yet-somehow-feel-that-iraq-is-preventing-the-us-from-effectively-preparing-for-other-conflicts/comment-page-1/#comment-720009 Pam Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:59:55 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/04/09/democrats-not-serious-about-gwot-yet-somehow-feel-that-iraq-is-preventing-the-us-from-effectively-preparing-for-other-conflicts/#comment-720009 Thankyou FAO, that is what I was trying to say! That is the point. If they can't fight AQ in Iraq, what makes them think that the next war will be any better. Thankyou FAO, that is what I was trying to say! That is the point. If they can’t fight AQ in Iraq, what makes them think that the next war will be any better.

]]> By: FrmrArtyOffcr http://rightvoices.com/2008/04/09/democrats-not-serious-about-gwot-yet-somehow-feel-that-iraq-is-preventing-the-us-from-effectively-preparing-for-other-conflicts/comment-page-1/#comment-719843 FrmrArtyOffcr Thu, 10 Apr 2008 02:31:21 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/04/09/democrats-not-serious-about-gwot-yet-somehow-feel-that-iraq-is-preventing-the-us-from-effectively-preparing-for-other-conflicts/#comment-719843 Pardon me, but how exactly does running away from a determined enemy that you are currently mopping the floor with help prepare you for the next war? Are the Dems so stupid as to think BJ Billy was winning the war against the radical islamists by running away? The best and surest way to keep from having to fight someone a second time, is to pound him into the ground the first time. Had we followed that philosophy in Iraq to start with, our casualties would've been a lot lower. Having to go back into Ramadi or Tikrit a second and third time caused a lot of unnecessary casualties. Had we been a little less concerned with trying to fight a politically correct war versus simply fighting a war, casualties would've been lower. Handing the Islamists' their heads quickly and decisively would've greatly lessened their ability to recruit more fighters. Instead of allowing many to slip away and claim a great victory for Allah, killing nearly all of them with overwhelming brute force would've sent those that did survive away screaming in their sleep from the nightmares. It is very hard to appear brave when you can't sleep for more than an hour without waking up screaming. Pardon me, but how exactly does running away from a determined enemy that you are currently mopping the floor with help prepare you for the next war? Are the Dems so stupid as to think BJ Billy was winning the war against the radical islamists by running away? The best and surest way to keep from having to fight someone a second time, is to pound him into the ground the first time. Had we followed that philosophy in Iraq to start with, our casualties would’ve been a lot lower. Having to go back into Ramadi or Tikrit a second and third time caused a lot of unnecessary casualties.

Had we been a little less concerned with trying to fight a politically correct war versus simply fighting a war, casualties would’ve been lower. Handing the Islamists’ their heads quickly and decisively would’ve greatly lessened their ability to recruit more fighters. Instead of allowing many to slip away and claim a great victory for Allah, killing nearly all of them with overwhelming brute force would’ve sent those that did survive away screaming in their sleep from the nightmares. It is very hard to appear brave when you can’t sleep for more than an hour without waking up screaming.

]]>