Jimmy Carter to meet with : Hamas leader in Syria.

What is it with Obama supporters?

6 Responses to “Jimmy Carter Proves To Be A Useful Idiot To Terrorists”

1. snowy egret
   April 9, 2008 - 08:06 AM on April 9th, 2008

   The PEANUT EATER KID should just stay back at the wacko place or at least return to his usful job at HABITAT FOR HUMANITY the only job he was good at JIMMY CARTER THE IDIOT

2. carolyne
   April 10, 2008 - 06:50 AM on April 10th, 2008

   That ‘Peanut Brain’ Carter is just trying to keep up with the Village Idiot Obama. Two rotten peas in a peanut, and they still get on MSNBC, wonders never cease.

3. John Coffee
   April 24, 2008 - 08:36 PM on April 24th, 2008

   God forbid Mr. Carter or any other sane person from attempting peace by talking rather than bombing, why that would destroy the war industry. The peanut brains are sideliners who want to stir it up. Cowards!

4. Pam
   April 25, 2008 - 05:45 AM on April 25th, 2008

   John, you might have a point if he had come home and just one of the parties backed him up, but they didn’t. Hamas and the Palestinians used him for propaganda purposes and as soom as he claimed he made progress they set the record straight..He was asked not to go and then tried to say Rices lied about it? Even the hard left cringed at that..

5. Robert
   April 25, 2008 - 07:30 AM on April 25th, 2008

   #3 You would have a point if it was someone with some credibility. But Carter long ago squandered any of that by opening his yap and uttering some of the dumbest things ever to come out of the mouth of an ex-President.

   Carter is like a turd that just won’t go down despite repeated flushes. Somehow he just keeps circling the bowl and hangs around, long after he should have gone away.

6. Pam
   April 25, 2008 - 07:33 AM on April 25th, 2008

   The Sad End of Jimmy Carter

   The problem is how Jimmy Carter went about it.

   The problem is the spectacular and useless embrace he exchanged with the senior Hamas dignitary, Nasser Shaer, in Ramallah.

   The problem is the wreath he laid piously at the grave of Yasser Arafat, who, as Mr. Carter knows better than anyone else, was a real obstacle to peace.

   It is that in Cairo, if we are to believe another Hamas leader, Mahmoud Zahar, whose statement has so far not been denied, Mr. Carter apparently described Hamas as a “national liberation movement” – this party which has made a cult of death, a mythology of blood and race, and an anti-Semitism along the lines of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion into the linchpin of its ideology.

   The problem is also the formidable nose thumbing he got from Hamas’s exiled leader, Khaled Mashaal, who, at the very moment he was receiving Mr. Carter, also triggered the first car bombing in several months in Keren Shalom on the Gaza strip – and that this event elicited from poor Mr. Carter, all tangled up in his small-time mediator calculations, not one disapproving or empathetic word.

   The former president, it will be recalled, is an old hand at this sort of thing.

   Going off track like this is not new for the man who 30 years ago was one of the architects of peace with Egypt, but who since then has not stopped vilifying Israel, comparing its political system to that of South Africa during apartheid, ignoring Israel’s desire for peace, which is no less real than its errors, even denying its suffering.

   A year ago, he told CBS that for years his beloved Hamas had not committed any terrorist attacks resulting in civilian casualties – this, a few months after the assassination of six people at the Karni Terminal, and the attack on Aug. 30, 2004, which killed 16 passengers in two buses in Beersheba.

   And it is one thing to speak to CBS, and another to say these words, which are unofficial but have indisputable moral authority, to the belligerents.

   It is one thing to say, in Dublin on June 19, 2007, that the true criminals are not those who proclaim, like Mashaal, that “before dying” Israel must be “humiliated and degraded,” but those who would prefer that these charming characters be pushed out of the circles of power, sooner or later, with a distinct preference for “sooner.” It is quite another to come over in person and put all one’s weight behind the most radical elements, those who are the most hostile to peace, the most profoundly nihilistic in the Palestinian camp.

   The truth is, if one wished to discredit the other side, to fully humiliate and ridicule the only Palestinian leader (Mahmoud Abbas) who at the risk of his life continues to believe in the solution of two states – if with a word one wanted to ruin the last dreams of men and women of goodwill who still believe in peace – one would be absolutely on the right track.

   So what happened to this man, a Nobel Peace Prize laureate?

   It’s a great read!

Leave a Reply

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website

Right Voices uses Gravatar to display individual comment author icons. If you'd like your own icon next to your name, then go to Gravatar.com and sign up - it's easy!

more »

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail