Comments on: The Democrat Math On Republican Filibusters: February 29, 2008= 72 Vs April 15, 2008= 65 http://rightvoices.com/2008/04/15/the-democrat-math-on-republican-filibusters-february-29-2008-72-vs-april-15-2008-65/ in all matter of opinion, our adversaries are insane. Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:05:09 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: pro tempore http://rightvoices.com/2008/04/15/the-democrat-math-on-republican-filibusters-february-29-2008-72-vs-april-15-2008-65/comment-page-1/#comment-721168 pro tempore Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:48:06 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/04/15/the-democrat-math-on-republican-filibusters-february-29-2008-72-vs-april-15-2008-65/#comment-721168 [...] seem to have a living, breathing definition of the word filibuster. It seems if the Democrats blohttp://rightvoices.com/2008/04/15/the-democrat-math-on-republican-filibusters-february-29-2008-72-vs...Tenn. proposal aims to keep students out of debt AP via Yahoo! Finance House Speaker pro tempore [...] [...] seem to have a living, breathing definition of the word filibuster. It seems if the Democrats blohttp://rightvoices.com/2008/04/15/the-democrat-math-on-republican-filibusters-february-29-2008-72-vs…Tenn. proposal aims to keep students out of debt AP via Yahoo! Finance House Speaker pro tempore [...]

]]> By: Ed Driscoll.com http://rightvoices.com/2008/04/15/the-democrat-math-on-republican-filibusters-february-29-2008-72-vs-april-15-2008-65/comment-page-1/#comment-721030 Ed Driscoll.com Thu, 17 Apr 2008 03:37:01 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/04/15/the-democrat-math-on-republican-filibusters-february-29-2008-72-vs-april-15-2008-65/#comment-721030 <strong>I Was Told That There Would Be No Math</strong> "The Democrat Math On Republican Filibusters: February 29, 2008= 72 Vs April 15, 2008= 65." Is the the proverbial New Math in action? Incidentally, I thought it was typically the minority party did these sort of photo-op stunts, not the... I Was Told That There Would Be No Math

“The Democrat Math On Republican Filibusters: February 29, 2008= 72 Vs April 15, 2008= 65.” Is the the proverbial New Math in action? Incidentally, I thought it was typically the minority party did these sort of photo-op stunts, not the…

]]> By: PCD http://rightvoices.com/2008/04/15/the-democrat-math-on-republican-filibusters-february-29-2008-72-vs-april-15-2008-65/comment-page-1/#comment-720963 PCD Wed, 16 Apr 2008 02:13:14 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/04/15/the-democrat-math-on-republican-filibusters-february-29-2008-72-vs-april-15-2008-65/#comment-720963 Way to go, Generalissimo, my former boss. Way to go, Generalissimo, my former boss.

]]> By: Pam http://rightvoices.com/2008/04/15/the-democrat-math-on-republican-filibusters-february-29-2008-72-vs-april-15-2008-65/comment-page-1/#comment-720956 Pam Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:33:48 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/04/15/the-democrat-math-on-republican-filibusters-february-29-2008-72-vs-april-15-2008-65/#comment-720956 Thanks for that Mark, I will note it in the post! :) Thanks for that Mark, I will note it in the post! :)

]]> By: Mark http://rightvoices.com/2008/04/15/the-democrat-math-on-republican-filibusters-february-29-2008-72-vs-april-15-2008-65/comment-page-1/#comment-720954 Mark Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:16:28 +0000 http://rightvoices.com/2008/04/15/the-democrat-math-on-republican-filibusters-february-29-2008-72-vs-april-15-2008-65/#comment-720954 Schumer and Reid are arrogant assholes. That being said, I don't think Reid was talking about President Bush. They have a decorum where they don't speak to each other, they speak to the President pro tempore. So all of their statements begin "Mr. President." Same with the House. Schumer and Reid are arrogant assholes. That being said, I don’t think Reid was talking about President Bush. They have a decorum where they don’t speak to each other, they speak to the President pro tempore. So all of their statements begin “Mr. President.” Same with the House.

]]>