RSS Feed
I mean really?!?! Just look at this line:
Murdoch’s reconceived Journal represents nothing short of a formal declaration of war on that most venerable of journalistic institutions, The New York Times.
The New York Times declared war on the readers, and Pinch has been a disaster
Matthew puts one rumor to rest:
The mag’s piece in turn sparked a newspaper industry news boomlet as other publications rushed to find out whether Newsweek’s claim that liberal Democrat Republican New York mayor Michael Bloomberg might give the New York Times Company a cash infusion to “protect the brand.”
Not so, says Bloomberg, who denied the claim that he was trying to get into the newspaper biz or purchase a share in Times Co.
Let’s take a walk down memory lane:
The New York Times Rings In The New Year With A Touching Tribute To Saddam
New York Times Reports 4Q Loss of $648M
ALERT: Rules Don’t Apply To The New York Times
NY TIMES publisher: ‘I really don’t know whether we’ll be printing in five years’…
NYT’s: If You Were a Terrorist, How Would You Attack?
UPDATE: New York Times goes after McCain again, with similar results
Jim Rutenberg has a new beat at the New York Times, and it must be called the Get McCain desk. He co-wrote the abominable story about Vicki Iseman in February that attempted to insinuate that McCain had traded legislative favors for sexual favors, only his story didn’t have a shred of evidence of either. Today, in another page-one blockbuster, Rutenberg claims that McCain gave out legislative favors in land-swap deals — but fails to mention that they had widespread support from legislators, businessmen, and environmentalists.
The New York Times’ Employee Entrance Exam
No Responses to “In Order For There To Be A War Between Rupert Murdoch And The New York Times, Doesn’t Murdoch Need An Opponent? UPDATE New York Times goes after McCain again, with similar results”
TrackBack URL